#1  
Old 09-20-2025, 11:32 AM
Singleton Singleton is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: coastal Alabama
Posts: 1,232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhein View Post
I don't know but people have suggested that even if I don't have any obvious starvation, it's still happening. I don't know if that only matters for someone who is racing or if would have any noticeable effect in a street only car like mine.
My GTO, (in signature), had the 550 RobbMc mechanical pump for several years with no noticeable fuel supply issues. Also used the RobbMc 1/2" tank pick-up along with 1/2" lines.
About two years ago. frustrated with the same issue you're describing with the empty fuel bowls, I decided to ditch the mechanical pump and went with the Tanks Inc setup with the in-tank 450lph pump and 1/2" supply and return. Used a cheap quickfuel bypass regulator plumbed-in after the carb, no hobbs switch.

I didn't expect any performance gains, since the car ran really strong on the street with the M&H drag radials, 495cid, 4sp, 4.10 gears. But after the electric pump install I was shocked at how quicker the engine pulled to redline. Like I said before, it ran great on the mechanical pump, but there was a noticeable difference after the Tanks Inc set up.
So the dry fuel bowl issue is solved and a slight fuel starvation issue that I didn't know about is also solved. And if I decide to go EFI, most of the components are already in place

__________________

66 GTO, 495, M22, Strange S-60 w/4.10
Sold new at Royal Pontiac (Dealer# 07-679)

70 Formula 400/auto

Last edited by Singleton; 09-20-2025 at 11:40 AM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Singleton For This Useful Post:
  #2  
Old 09-20-2025, 11:35 AM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Singleton View Post
My GTO, (in signature), had the 550 RobbMc mechanical pump for several years with no noticeable fuel supply issues. Also used the RobbMc 1/2" tank pick-up along with 1/2" lines.
About two years ago. frustrated with the same issue you're describing with the empty fuel bowls, I decided to ditch the mechanical pump and went with the Tanks Inc setup with the in-tank 450lph pump and 1/2" supply and return. Used a cheap quickfuel bypass regulator plumbed-in after the carb, no hobbs switch.

I didn't expect any performance gains, since the car ran really strong on the street with the M&H drag radials, 495cid, 4sp, 4.10 gears. But after the electric pump install I was shocked at how quicker and stonger the engine pulled to redline. Like I said before, it ran great on the mechanical pump, but there was a noticeable difference after the Tanks Inc set up.
So the dry fuel bowl issue is solved and a slight fuel starvation issue that I didn't know about is also solved. And if I decide to go EFI, the components are already in place
That's great info. Thanks.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017