[DANTIP]

I spoke with the owner and requested to see the "Car Billing History" page from PHS and he said it was not included because it was not clear. I was hoping the CBH page would not only confirm the options but would also contain the EUN that would match the WT engine.

[Baron Von Zeppelin]

Originally Posted by DANTIP

I spoke with the owner and requested to see the "Car Billing History" page from PHS and he said it was not included because it was not clear. I was hoping the CBH page would not only confirm the options but would also contain the EUN that would match the WT engine.

If you can get the EUN , and the block-heads-intake casting dates , and Carb ID
That would be good data.
We could also determine if the EUN is in good range for body date,
but on a 67 the date codes are usually enough to make the decision.

PHS usually includes a statement about the BHC being bad , and still includes a nasty copy of it.
Unfortunate when that happens.
The one for my 67 is the clearest one I have ever seen.

[60sstuff]

I asked the seller early in the auction if he had the “car billing history” card to verify this car and he said he didn’t have it.

I also asked this question today hoping to see photos of the supposed stored Original engine that needs rebuilt.

Very neat car if the engine is still here and it’s not broken.

[Baron Von Zeppelin]

Starting to sound like some baloney business to me.
Could be any year WT

PHS does usually include a note on cars with blurry documents , and a blurry copy of it.
I would want to see that statement at minimum , if I were a buyer prospect.

They can see them better in their viewer than the copy machine prints out.
And they decipher it onto an order form , which is normal routine anyway.
Point is , they could likely discern the EUN if asked by a paying customer.

[242177P]

Originally Posted by Baron Von Zeppelin

Starting to sound like some baloney business to me.
Could be any year WT

I started questioning everything the owner wrote after
seeing it has 19670 miles on it. PHS shows Rally IIs, and
yet he claims those repainted steel wheels are original?
The floors are in great shape? Uhh, they were replaced.
The interior doesn't have rips or tears? Uhh, new covers.

I like the car, but the seller's antics make me wary.

[60sstuff]

Ended, did not meet reserve at $40,399.

Understandable, as the seller was very vague on many important issues with this car.

[Baron Von Zeppelin]

No idea how long they have owned it , but they should plan on having it a lot longer.

[60sstuff]

Originally Posted by 60sstuff

Ended, did not meet reserve at $40,399.

Understandable, as the seller was very vague on many important issues with this car.

BTW, I asked last week for photos of the supposed Original WT engine with (date/stamping) that was tired and needing a rebuild.
He said he would take photos and get back to me …… sure 🙄