[60sstuff]

I asked the seller early in the auction if he had the “car billing history” card to verify this car and he said he didn’t have it.

I also asked this question today hoping to see photos of the supposed stored Original engine that needs rebuilt.

Very neat car if the engine is still here and it’s not broken.

[Baron Von Zeppelin]

Starting to sound like some baloney business to me.
Could be any year WT

PHS does usually include a note on cars with blurry documents , and a blurry copy of it.
I would want to see that statement at minimum , if I were a buyer prospect.

They can see them better in their viewer than the copy machine prints out.
And they decipher it onto an order form , which is normal routine anyway.
Point is , they could likely discern the EUN if asked by a paying customer.

[242177P]

Originally Posted by Baron Von Zeppelin

Starting to sound like some baloney business to me.
Could be any year WT

I started questioning everything the owner wrote after
seeing it has 19670 miles on it. PHS shows Rally IIs, and
yet he claims those repainted steel wheels are original?
The floors are in great shape? Uhh, they were replaced.
The interior doesn't have rips or tears? Uhh, new covers.

I like the car, but the seller's antics make me wary.

[60sstuff]

Ended, did not meet reserve at $40,399.

Understandable, as the seller was very vague on many important issues with this car.

[Baron Von Zeppelin]

No idea how long they have owned it , but they should plan on having it a lot longer.

[60sstuff]

Originally Posted by 60sstuff

Ended, did not meet reserve at $40,399.

Understandable, as the seller was very vague on many important issues with this car.

BTW, I asked last week for photos of the supposed Original WT engine with (date/stamping) that was tired and needing a rebuild.
He said he would take photos and get back to me …… sure 🙄