| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does anyone know of what advantages the "HO" exhaust manifolds have over "Stock" exhaust manifolds?
I have the 9777646 (left) HO manifolds on my '66 GTO, which has a 428 in it. I am curious if there is much gain over "stock"? Thanks in advance for your input & knowledge. Just an ol man trying to learn
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Read HPP article, it’s a 2 parter, they do manifolds and exhaust at the track to see what’s best
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks, Allan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
67 LeMans, 326, M20, 3.31 12 Bolt |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
On a stock or near stock mild engine you gain maybe 8 horsepower switching from standard passenger car log style exhaust manifolds to the streamlined HO / Ram Air exhaust manifolds.
All of the early GTO 389 4-barrel 325 hp (1964) and 335 hp (65-66) engines as well as the Tri-Power GTO 389s (348 hp 1964, 360 hp 65-66) had log exhaust manifolds. It’s not like they didn’t hold their own on the street in factory trim. So of course the high performance manifolds do offer a performance advantage but on a mostly stock engine you have to be the judge of whether or not spending in the neighborhood of $600 for the manifolds and down pipes to match is worth it to you for 8 horsepower. Of course they look neat but again with some people’s budgets they’re not worth it.
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/3.08 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 1966 VW Type 2 Single Cab Pickup 140hp 2276 1956 VW Type 2 Panel Van 36hp 1200 1957 VW Type 1 Beetle 180hp 2276 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not to mention they weigh twice as much too.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
A great read, and intersting numbers in the comparision. I wish I knew what cam is in this engine, but it runs so well, & I'm not pulling it apart to find out. I am, however going to enjoy it for what it is, and it "ain't no slug"! ![]() Thanks for the information. Allan |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
“Sorry, I'm not familiar with the "HPP" article. What are you referring to?”
Thanks, Allan Allan, To answer your question, HPP is High Performance Pontiac magazine. I thought it was a great rag. Plenty of tech and performance articles that were how to and informational. Unfortunately it died a suddden and painful death a few years back. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
HPP also does a strip day article swapping of a bunch of headers to see increases.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
1973 GTO , 406" automatic 3.23 posi setup with stock #13 heads and Summit 2801 cam. The stock exhaust manifolds with 2" full exhaust and AP turbo mufflers ran 15.2 sec @90 mph. Engine done by 4500 rpm. I changed the exhaust over to Ram Air reproduction manifolds with 2.5'' openings and 2.5 inch full exhaust with Dynomax Super Turbo mufflers. Car ran 14.7 @94 mph and pulled right to 5000 rpm shift point. Power speed calculator said engine went from 250 to 285 net horsepower. Driving it has much more throttle response and a nicer sound.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great information! Thanks for posting!
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|