#1  
Old 12-02-2025, 08:33 PM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve25 View Post
The one thing I don’t like that was done in that video is that the bore length of his flow bench adapter was real short .
I agree. I watched the video, it was interesting. I don’t think that narrow tape for a smaller bore translates to very good data. The knotch combined with the short tape is pretty strange data to. There is something to be learned from it, but the lesson might have more to do with turbulence than bore size.

I build some LA mopars, and have a 71 340 duster. A few years ago Nick’s garage did a 390 CID based 318 stroker that made 406Hp thru A body exhaust manifolds like my 340 Duster. It had ported iron heads with 2.02s and a HFT, similar to my 340. But my 340 is closer to 380HP thru manifolds, might be able to split the difference with a cam like the 318 stroker used, it definitely had a better cam. But overall it appeared the extra stroke and cubes were more important than the bore.


Last edited by Jay S; 12-02-2025 at 08:57 PM.
  #2  
Old 12-02-2025, 09:14 PM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay S View Post
But overall it appeared the extra stroke and cubes were more important than the bore.
I think thats probably going to hold true in all but extreme examples. As long as you have a reasonable valve size, adding more CI is going to have a larger impact on power, than adding more valve size without adding CI. Of course if you can it would always be better to add both.

When you are CI limited, bigger valve will make more power. Assuming supporting modifications of course. The DZ and Boss 302 from the Trans AM Series come to mind. The Ford motor flat out made more power because its heads had a 2.23 intake valve compared to the Chevy 2.02. They should have won more of those races, but the Ford's couldnt stay on the track. Jokes write themselves. I also think Ive read that a wedge head motor is a more efficient design than a hemispherical chamber, but the HEMI simply allows you to shove larger valves in it, which on the dyno or at the top end of the race track is going to make bigger numbers. Engine masters did something like that with a Hemi and a wedge mopar, where the HEMI would have won a drag race but lost everywhere else.

Im sure if you graphed a static CI engine with different valve sizes and a static valve size with varying CI there would likely be an equilibrium somewhere.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017