#1  
Old 12-08-2025, 09:55 AM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,929
Default

"Like all other aspects of engine building, port size is relative to the required airflow of the engine. The smallest port that will deliver the airflow needed by the engine is desirable. That means we will have excellent velocity for port filling, but without any choke that may limit required peak airflow. The needed airflow depends on engine displacement, RPM, and VE at that RPM. And a port big enough to deliver 400 cfm may well be too large for any engine that can only use 300 cfm."

Jim Hand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmfxHNxk8ew


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
Best time 5.13 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #2  
Old 12-08-2025, 11:20 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,585
Default

From what I recall Jim Hand was not of the opinion that Aluminum heads provide an octane advantage for increasing the compression on pump gas. That was why he did not increase the compression much with the KRE heads. I think he was both correct and incorrect on that idea. So long as the heads are identical, every test I have seen changing from Aluminum to Cast Iron has not shown any difference in octane tolerance or power. I think Jim was correct on that idea. But where I think he was incorrect is that a port volume increase does generally allow for more cylinder pressure on the same octane. I suspect increasing port volume moves air flow to where piston speed is faster, likely also leads to a cooler air charge, and also tends to move some engine scavenging around so the power band gets shifted a little higher of spread out. Depending on the car, some of those things will not necessarily improve the engines performance. If you could replicate an iron copy of a KRE or Eddy head, i think the Iron heads would run identical. The Iron to Aluminum contest to me more decide on how thick the castings are to manipulated them. The winner in that area is likely the Aluminum heads.

My 6X heads on my TA are ported to 185 cc. I tried 196cc on another set and lost 16 cfm at peak flow against the 185 cc head. I would expect the 196cc had more flow lift in it someplace, but I could not find it. Here is a couple photos of the 196cc 6X heads. The photo has a 1.77 valve that is sitting down on the valve guide stem.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1851.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	32.5 KB
ID:	661886   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4153.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	56.5 KB
ID:	661887  


Last edited by Jay S; 12-08-2025 at 11:38 AM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017