#1  
Old 12-11-2025, 09:38 PM
Safari Larry's Avatar
Safari Larry Safari Larry is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 602
Default

Regarding converting 59 engine block to 1960 engine "conventional" cooling style block, see https://pontiacsafari.com/EngineCooling/index.htm and scroll down to the heading "Engine Differences in Reverse Flow and Conventional Flow"

The 59 engine with reverse cooling first distributes cooling water evenly front to back in each head through the water distributing tubes. Water then flows from heads into the block evenly from front to back through holes in the deck.

The 60 block first sends cooling water directly into the engine block and then up into the heads with more water directed to the back of block and heads. Water flows through the heads towards the front then into the intake manifold and from there into the top of radiator.

To accommodate the difference in water flow and cause most cooling water to flow to back of block, the 60 block has fewer and smaller water holes in the front of deck than the 59 deck. So to convert a 59 reverse flow block to a 60 conventional flow block, you would need to close water passages in the deck towards the front, and I maybe reduce size of some passages.

You would also need to use a 60 front cover and add a water hose from intake manifold water to the front cover.

Does that cover everything? I'm not certain but I think so. I once considered converting a 60 block to 59 reverse flow style but decided against it. Thus the article I wrote to attempt explaining the differences in reverse vs conventional flow blocks.

__________________
Larry Gorden
POCI 1956 Tech Adviser
www.PontiacSafari.com
  #2  
Old 12-12-2025, 12:37 AM
captain pickle captain pickle is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2025
Posts: 3
Default

Thank you guys. I guess I'll keep it reverse flow.

I also found all the strange valve uses that Pontiac did, making 58 and 60 the same but not 59, plus all the SD stuff.

I find it odd that overall length of valves is used when a grind on the margin will change the spring height. That is why I was after that dimension so I could check where I was. My question for using 59 valves was that I located some in oversize, but not the 60. I'm trying to avoid replacing the guides so that I do not disrupt the existing alignment of the guides and seats.

I may be looking for "blueprint" level data when backyard close enough is fine for a stock driver.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017