#1  
Old 03-08-2026, 02:43 PM
Gator67's Avatar
Gator67 Gator67 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 1,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68bird400HO View Post
I had fuel pump issues a few years ago and started a thread on it. I had replaced my leaking fuel pump and the new one died after about 100 miles. I did find the reason for the pump failure and started discussing it at about post #58. Here is a link to the thread at page 3.

https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...=868529&page=3

In short, the failure isn't the diaphragm, it is the arm. The repops are using the wrong arm. It appears the repops copy the Delco body but are using the Carter arm which is a little different and sits a little higher at the eccentric contact point. This puts too much pressure on the arm when compressed and they eventually break, and the car dies instantly. There are some out there with the correct arm, the "Muscle Car Fuel Pumps" from Summit or Jegs but I am not sure if they are produced anymore.

You also could try to buy a repop and swap the arm. I was messing with that a little and just don't have the correct tool to uncrimp the aluminum to get the arm pin free. I think it would slide out if you could do that, though.
BINGO!

Removed the fuel pump and found two little pieces which came from the end of the arm that depresses the spring. I removed the arm myself to make sure there were no missing pieces that could have made their way into the engine. I got lucky. Good grief...



Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3001.jpg
Views:	183
Size:	47.5 KB
ID:	665966   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3003.jpg
Views:	180
Size:	39.5 KB
ID:	665967  

__________________
"If the best Mustang is the Camaro, the best Camaro is actually the Firebird" David Zenlea
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Gator67 For This Useful Post:
  #2  
Old 03-08-2026, 05:22 PM
Shiny's Avatar
Shiny Shiny is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Windsor CO
Posts: 2,481
Default

Glad you found a reason for the pump failing. Thanks for sharing the painful carnage.

You can see some forming wrinkles in the sides of the arm in the section photo right where yours broke.

Maybe the steel they use is weak or the forming operation is just bad quality?

Unfortunately, there's no way to inspect that part of the arm on a new pump. The factory probably likes that!

What brand pump? It looks brand new....

You think this has anything to do with the unexpected fuel in the vent return line? Maybe there was more destruction inside the pump?

The Following User Says Thank You to Shiny For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 03-09-2026, 10:16 AM
68bird400HO's Avatar
68bird400HO 68bird400HO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Surrounded By Reality
Posts: 2,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gator67 View Post
BINGO!

Removed the fuel pump and found two little pieces which came from the end of the arm that depresses the spring. I removed the arm myself to make sure there were no missing pieces that could have made their way into the engine. I got lucky. Good grief...



Yep, I had those same broken pieces fall out of mine too. I bet if you put the correct arm on, the pump would be fine.

Any tips on getting the arm out? I was trying to uncrimp the aluminum around the pin so I could recrimp in a new arm. I'm not sure what tool to get in there with.

__________________
1968 Firebird 400HO convertible
1971 Trans Am 4-speed, white/blue
  #4  
Old 03-09-2026, 10:48 AM
Gator67's Avatar
Gator67 Gator67 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 1,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68bird400HO View Post
Yep, I had those same broken pieces fall out of mine too. I bet if you put the correct arm on, the pump would be fine.

Any tips on getting the arm out? I was trying to uncrimp the aluminum around the pin so I could recrimp in a new arm. I'm not sure what tool to get in there with.
I used a hammer and large screwdriver I have no plans to reuse the pump, or buy another new one. My wife drives this car around town, so it has to be reliable.

I'll probably order up a RobbMc pump for this car as well as my GTO, since that one's down with a bad Delphi pump as well.

__________________
"If the best Mustang is the Camaro, the best Camaro is actually the Firebird" David Zenlea
The Following User Says Thank You to Gator67 For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 03-09-2026, 01:14 PM
Shiny's Avatar
Shiny Shiny is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Windsor CO
Posts: 2,481
Default

I just sent a note and thread link to Delphi about this failure mode just to find out if they will actually respond. I don't expect anything back beyond "if your part fails, return it and try again.... you might get lucky next time".

But I noticed my pump was MF0155, not MF0154. I found it odd to have a unique PN (MF0154) for 1968 applications.

Anyone know the actual differences in the pumps for 1968 vs 1970? Is it only the apparent difference in vent line configuration (straight vs elbow)?

Their online specs do show a slight performance difference, which I also found interesting and unexpected. The 68 pump says max 8 psi, the 70 says max 7 psi. Really? Does this mean the 68 pump arm is stressed more for some reason?






I also found a note in their installation instructions to grease the inside of the arm cavity. I certainly did not do this. Anyone else put grease in that cavity and how important is this?



Mike
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-03-09 105602.jpg
Views:	127
Size:	51.2 KB
ID:	666007   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-03-09 105639.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	22.5 KB
ID:	666008   Click image for larger version

Name:	Grease.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	102.0 KB
ID:	666009  

  #6  
Old 03-09-2026, 01:48 PM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 16,210
Default

I have never heard of putting grease in the cavity, and not sure it would make a diff anyway. Pump should get plenty of lube from splash, and the grease would wash out in a short period of time.

Maybe it is meant for other makes/models? Still can't think of what would use that step.

I have heard of people using grease on SBC engines, but it's just to aid in holding the pushrod while installing the pump.


.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
The Following User Says Thank You to HWYSTR455 For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 03-09-2026, 06:44 PM
scott70's Avatar
scott70 scott70 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maine
Posts: 2,735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gator67 View Post
I used a hammer and large screwdriver I have no plans to reuse the pump, or buy another new one. My wife drives this car around town, so it has to be reliable.

I'll probably order up a RobbMc pump for this car as well as my GTO, since that one's down with a bad Delphi pump as well.
The robbmc mechanical pump has to have a regulator with it. I didn’t realize that,, they used to be self regulated but they changed it a few years ago

__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007
(cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD
1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.45 @ 88.1 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.19 60ft.Owned since 86'
The Following User Says Thank You to scott70 For This Useful Post:
  #8  
Old 03-10-2026, 10:26 AM
Gator67's Avatar
Gator67 Gator67 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 1,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scott70 View Post
The robbmc mechanical pump has to have a regulator with it. I didn’t realize that,, they used to be self regulated but they changed it a few years ago

Interesting. This seems to contradict the information on the website/instructions, which indicates a regulator is not typically needed with the 550hp version of the pump (it is needed on the 1100)...it says 7psi +/- 1 and that using the vapor return should reduce it by 1psi. This seems to be in the ballpark of what I need for a Qjet. Was your experience different?

The instructions also suggest that if a regulator is needed, it should be a non-return version placed between the pump and carb. The problem here is that I seem to recall to function correctly, the pressure to the regulator should be like 3psi greater than the desired pressure.

__________________
"If the best Mustang is the Camaro, the best Camaro is actually the Firebird" David Zenlea
The Following User Says Thank You to Gator67 For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old 03-10-2026, 12:02 PM
scott70's Avatar
scott70 scott70 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maine
Posts: 2,735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gator67 View Post
Interesting. This seems to contradict the information on the website/instructions, which indicates a regulator is not typically needed with the 550hp version of the pump (it is needed on the 1100)...it says 7psi +/- 1 and that using the vapor return should reduce it by 1psi. This seems to be in the ballpark of what I need for a Qjet. Was your experience different?

The instructions also suggest that if a regulator is needed, it should be a non-return version placed between the pump and carb. The problem here is that I seem to recall to function correctly, the pressure to the regulator should be like 3psi greater than the desired pressure.
Yes sorry… the 1100 pump used to be adjustable and they did away with it the save on costs.

__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007
(cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD
1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.45 @ 88.1 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.19 60ft.Owned since 86'
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017