| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
10% more HP in an NA?
Thanks, Craig |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would say at least, technically it is about 25% or more BTU's at high RPM.
Whether or not one can use it is up to the circumstances.
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! W.E.C moment "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks
I feel a metal on metal travel limiter on the front suspension has to shock the back tires to abruptly. After you spend all kind of money on double adjustable shocks to make everything articulate at a controlled rate it seems counter productive to then have metal on metal so I put that stiff little coil spring on the all thread. The travel is adjustable with the nylock nut and the bottom of the rod is mounted with rubber shock bushing to also help soften the same negative effect.
__________________
1964 GTO, 488 cubes , 340 cfm E heads by butler 268/276 on 110 solid roller. .440 lobes 1.65 hs rockers. 12.5:1 . Single 4150/1050 cfm carb by ATM. Back half ,ladder bar, foot brake. 8” ati , home made th400 with 2.75 low gear set and 4.10:1 rear. Stock block splayed billet, Eagle forged rotating assembly. 3050 lbs with driver. 9.25/142.5 100 pct home made. Bucket list dream checked off! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|