| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
And your reply in post number 6 wasn’t put up with the intention of alluding to that?
Give me and others on this string a break.
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Regarding your SD‑ported 6X‑8 heads (264 cfm).
Depending the a amount of port work done to them some grinding may be necessary on a "Tomahawk" intake as well. See posts 18 & 19 here: https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...omahawk+intake Other comments within that thread might be of interest as well. .
__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 ) Old information here: http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/ Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine) Best time 5.13 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Steve C. For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I didn’t imply or allude anything, other than I run a ‘72 HO intake, and they have a decent potential. If you inferred anything else than that, it’s on you. I’m out. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|