#1  
Old 06-29-2026, 03:37 PM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Vineland,N.J.
Posts: 1,623
Default

Correct me if I am wrong. If you restricted flow thru the push rods wouldn't you still see full flow at the lifter? You would just be limiting oil to the valve springs and rockers.

My restrictors for a solid roller are .030 but tapped into the oil feed to the lifters in the block. But this is a mainly strip car with occasional street driving. Myself, I would rather have restricted push rods.

The Following User Says Thank You to Mike S For This Useful Post:
  #2  
Old 06-29-2026, 06:47 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike S View Post
Correct me if I am wrong. If you restricted flow thru the push rods wouldn't you still see full flow at the lifter? You would just be limiting oil to the valve springs and rockers.
.
That's what I was wondering too.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
  #3  
Old 06-29-2026, 07:25 PM
P@blo's Avatar
P@blo P@blo is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,743
Default

Spring cooling would be a concern on engines expected to meet warranty or make higher mileage. For engines that see low mileage the trade off to provide more pressure below makes sense.

I am in the water industry and a short neck down does not affect flow much. Is the entire push rod orifice restrictedor just a portion? Also, If pressure increases on a smaller orifice so does flow as they are they are related.

  #4  
Old 06-30-2026, 11:22 AM
Singleton Singleton is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: coastal Alabama
Posts: 1,232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike S View Post
My restrictors for a solid roller are .030 but tapped into the oil feed to the lifters in the block. But this is a mainly strip car with occasional street driving. Myself, I would rather have restricted push rods.
Here’s a recent video from Powell’s Machine Shop, where he says the same thing about not restricting flow to the lifter, and shows the damage done to a customers roller lifters by restricting the lifter bore. http://https://youtu.be/KRt55CphSqU?is=zWZhVwuzjss33_W_

__________________

66 GTO, 495, M22, Strange S-60 w/4.10
Sold new at Royal Pontiac (Dealer# 07-679)

70 Formula 400/auto
  #5  
Old 06-30-2026, 01:59 PM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Singleton View Post
Here’s a recent video from Powell’s Machine Shop, where he says the same thing about not restricting flow to the lifter, and shows the damage done to a customers roller lifters by restricting the lifter bore. http://https://youtu.be/KRt55CphSqU?is=zWZhVwuzjss33_W_
That guy in the video had his oil restricted down to about 1 gpm with his .1” orifice before the oil even made it to the lifters. Maybe he had 2 plugs on each bank, maybe 2 gpm at most. Either way, is a lot of restriction before the oil is even close to getting to the top end.

The Following User Says Thank You to Jay S For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017