#1  
Old 07-17-2026, 10:21 AM
kingbuzzo's Avatar
kingbuzzo kingbuzzo is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,213
Default

For me it was going to cost too much to restore my old bondo basket case so I spent my $ on a better car. Re-body is also an option to skip bodywork hell.

I seen lots of guys going the Tremec route for a 5 speed with good results.

Detroit Speed may be another option for your ride.

Lots of bluetooth radio options available that look stock. If there is already a hole cut in the dash you could get a single din unit or double din floater type - that's what I did.

__________________
Esquire

'74 T/A 455 Y-code SD clone

previously on Dawson's Creek:

'74 T/A 400
'81 AMC SX/4
'69 FB 350
  #2  
Old 07-17-2026, 10:41 AM
AMSOILGUY AMSOILGUY is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2026
Posts: 13
Default

With this being a rescue from my Dad. Yes he has had this project car for 30 years. I have some logistics with titling that I am squaring away. Once that is resolved parts will start to get ordered. I am not going to worry about body work and make the suspension and drivetrain so sweet it will only make sense to finish it. Funds are not unlimited but allocated to get this phase done!

  #3  
Old 07-17-2026, 01:27 PM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,875
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMSOILGUY View Post
With this being a rescue from my Dad. Yes he has had this project car for 30 years. I have some logistics with titling that I am squaring away. Once that is resolved parts will start to get ordered. I am not going to worry about body work and make the suspension and drivetrain so sweet it will only make sense to finish it. Funds are not unlimited but allocated to get this phase done!
That is a common mistake by the uninitiated. Am often presented w the ramifications of such early "build" choices. Have seen a TON of project part outs. Early performance A-body projects often present a myriad of surprises in the condition of the body & chassis. It is a must to have a thorough examination of all the trouble spots in the body & have a good idea of what will be needed metal wise.

Frames... first place I carefully check on any '64-72 A-body is the condition of the frame. Not just for rust scaling or rot in the rear section or rust out around front body bushing mounts. The FIRST spot I always examine is the sweep of the frame coming down behind the front passenger side lower control arm rear mounting tab. Having pulled hundreds of GM A-body frames, that area of the curved sweep of the frame is susceptible to stress cracking... and always from the weight of heavier factory engine & accessories torqueing over, very common. In frames from early 6 cyl Tempests & Chevelle 300's have never ran across that issue.

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.
  #4  
Old 07-17-2026, 06:16 PM
AMSOILGUY AMSOILGUY is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2026
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 'ol Pinion head View Post
That is a common mistake by the uninitiated. Am often presented w the ramifications of such early "build" choices. Have seen a TON of project part outs. Early performance A-body projects often present a myriad of surprises in the condition of the body & chassis. It is a must to have a thorough examination of all the trouble spots in the body & have a good idea of what will be needed metal wise.

Frames... first place I carefully check on any '64-72 A-body is the condition of the frame. Not just for rust scaling or rot in the rear section or rust out around front body bushing mounts. The FIRST spot I always examine is the sweep of the frame coming down behind the front passenger side lower control arm rear mounting tab. Having pulled hundreds of GM A-body frames, that area of the curved sweep of the frame is susceptible to stress cracking... and always from the weight of heavier factory engine & accessories torqueing over, very common. In frames from early 6 cyl Tempests & Chevelle 300's have never ran across that issue.

Thanks for the info. So I think this affirms that separating the body from frame is a must. If things go well this weekend I hope to accomplish this.

  #5  
Old 07-17-2026, 06:27 PM
AMSOILGUY AMSOILGUY is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2026
Posts: 13
Default

How's it look?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20260717_172451.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	63.1 KB
ID:	673613   Click image for larger version

Name:	20260717_172445.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	92.1 KB
ID:	673614   Click image for larger version

Name:	20260717_172459.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	61.1 KB
ID:	673615   Click image for larger version

Name:	20260717_172436.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	66.5 KB
ID:	673616  

  #6  
Old 07-20-2026, 04:55 PM
AMSOILGUY AMSOILGUY is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2026
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 'ol Pinion head View Post
That is a common mistake by the uninitiated. Am often presented w the ramifications of such early "build" choices. Have seen a TON of project part outs. Early performance A-body projects often present a myriad of surprises in the condition of the body & chassis. It is a must to have a thorough examination of all the trouble spots in the body & have a good idea of what will be needed metal wise.

Frames... first place I carefully check on any '64-72 A-body is the condition of the frame. Not just for rust scaling or rot in the rear section or rust out around front body bushing mounts. The FIRST spot I always examine is the sweep of the frame coming down behind the front passenger side lower control arm rear mounting tab. Having pulled hundreds of GM A-body frames, that area of the curved sweep of the frame is susceptible to stress cracking... and always from the weight of heavier factory engine & accessories torqueing over, very common. In frames from early 6 cyl Tempests & Chevelle 300's have never ran across that
Lets gain 2 inches!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20260720_124026_Samsung Browser.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	38.2 KB
ID:	673700  

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017