FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Nearly ALL modern gasolines have at least 10% ethanol content. This additional heat source would increase the normal BTU content.
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” Dr. Thomas Sowell |
The Following User Says Thank You to hurryinhoosier62 For This Useful Post: | ||
#42
|
||||
|
||||
I am not sure how ethanol got thrown into this topic of hardened seats? Like AG said the density and the energy per lbs of ethanol is quite a bit lower than regular gasoline. To fatten the mixture up to run ethanol should nearly always drop the engine temp. It is why E85 has trouble getting enough heat into the engine. If it is running hot with an ethanol mix it is probably something to do with the tune running lean. I don’t know that the blame should be on the fuel in that case.
The tune running on the lean side over many miles is probably some of the reason why one engine goes forever on a head with stock valves seats, and another has ate the valves into the seats in the same time frame. On something the exhaust valve is running terribly hot, pulling a constant heavy load, it is a good idea to put exhaust seats in to help drop the valve temp down. From what I recall the seat insert help pull heat away from the valve seat, that is why the valves last longer more so than the “hardness”.. On propane engines that we pull hard under constant load, because the fuel is really dry, and often run lean, with hot exh temps, we always have seat inserts done for those reasons. If that is not an option, we have a really wide seat width on the exh to help pull heat from the valve. I can’t recall that Pontiac really has more issues with seat inserts than other brands. But the coolant is definitely not far away, I have hit it before. If you work on enough heads you will hit coolant installing seats on about any given mfg. One of my friend’s had seats put in his RA4 heads, the heads were basically new. I thought it was absolutely crazy, since that car will not have more than 3000 miles put on it in it’s lifetime as long as my buddy own’s it. He was shocked when he got them back, he wasn’t really expecting that done. But some builders do it often because they constantly see issues in that area. The builder didn’t know my friend’s RA4 engine was probably not going to see much for miles. If you leave your heads at as shop that does a ton of heads, and tell them to “fix them”, chances are they will come back with new exh seats. I had inserts put in on my 6X-4s with 1.77s, but I planned to drive my car quite a bit, and it has 170 lbs of seat pressure. A lot too this topic, one size doesn’t fit all. I think I read someone’s response that said the same thing. X2 Last edited by Jay S; 02-17-2023 at 01:37 PM. |
#43
|
||||
|
||||
If your engine takes 1,000 Revs to go a 1/4 mile with gasoline with MTBE
Your engine will need roughly 1,100 revs to do that with 10% alcohol. With E85 , your engine may need 1,500 revs to get the job done, At same speed. This uses MORE fuel, burning More fuel makes More heat. Regardless of combustion, alcohol has Higher octane. I mentioned the fuel, because old engines with higher heat may need some mods to help prevent excess heat at the valve seats. Density of alcohol is pathetic for most ICE applications.
__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulabruce For This Useful Post: | ||
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Alcohol burns cooler than gasoline.
Alcohol has fewer BTUs of energy per gallon than gasoline. Running alcohol does not change the vehicle gearing or tire size, therefore it doesn't add a hundred "revs" to go a mile. Alcohol has higher octane rating than typical gasoline, but octane rating doesn't mean anything in relation to combustion temperature. Burning more fuel of lower energy-density does not have to create "more" heat. Replacing "high heat" gasoline with some amount of low-heat alcohol REDUCES combustion--and therefore engine--temperature. The more alcohol you run compared to gasoline, the less heat the engine makes, and the more energy is absorbed trying to vaporize the additional fuel volume. The only effect that alcohol fuel might have on the valve seats is a lack of lubricity between valve face and valve seat. I never researched the "calories" in gasoline except to note that "calories" and "Calories" are very different. Captial-C "Calories" is a measure used for food products, and actually represents Kilocalories. The Calories--and carbohydrate content--of alcohol is well-known. Lots of alcoholics are also diabetics as a result of the carb content. Last edited by Schurkey; 02-17-2023 at 04:19 PM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Schurkey For This Useful Post: | ||
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
(0.1x12,800 BTU) + (0.9x20,400 BTU) = 19,640 BTU/ib.
__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule. |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Some AFR examples, Gasoline is ideally 14.7, ethanol is something like 9 or 10, the lower ideal AFR results in a lot less heat from combustion. If you run a blend of ethanol with gasoline the AFR needs to be a bit lower, or for example, jump from a straight gasoline to an ethanol blend, and the engine runs hotter, it is because the AFR is too high. It needs to be richer to lower the AFR. More examples, Propane’s ideal AFR is just over 15, if I recall correct, it’s octane is something just over 110. Octane is much higher than higher than 91 octane gasoline like and at the same time it has lower btu rating than gasoline (more like ethanol), but it needs an AFR if closer to 15. The higher AFR ratio is what make the exhaust hot on propane, and the heat is hard on the valves and seats. Plus it beats ups the valves because it is a dry fuel with no lubrication. Diesel has a lot of lubrication for the valves, and has a higher btu rating than any gasoline, but it’s ideal is AFR starts around 17, and can go as high as 60+. The extreme AFR for some diesel’s is why some people have to have pyrometers on their higher powered turbo charged diesels.. More fuel due to lower density of ethanol and methanol have a big cooling effect on the incoming air charge, and the lower required AFR for ethanol and methanol results in cooler combustion temps also. The density and octane are not the big factors for heat. The issues with ethanol are mostly from the increase in corrosion and absorbing water. As far as I know ethanol and methanol do not have much for issues from a lack of lubrication, if they do the lack of heat offsets it. Last edited by Jay S; 02-17-2023 at 05:31 PM. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
And would produce less HP, thus necessitating the engine to work harder which would increase the temp inside the chamber. It’s really not difficult to understand unless you make it so. WHY does running E85 necessitate running much larger carb jets? Because E85 has fewer BTUs to begin with. BTUs equal work; if a fuel has fewer BTUs the engine in question WILL require more fuel( and higher combustion temps) to equal the same amount of work.
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” Dr. Thomas Sowell |
The Following User Says Thank You to hurryinhoosier62 For This Useful Post: | ||
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” Dr. Thomas Sowell |
The Following User Says Thank You to hurryinhoosier62 For This Useful Post: | ||
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Fact., our CARB V-8s on any alcohol need MORE FUEL to run right...
Any Ideal Ratios for Alcohol OR gasoline don't work when you test drive. 99% of the time, you need to Richen the mixture. If a New truck on E85 uses 20 gallons to go 250 miles and uses only 15 Gallons of 10% to go 250 Miles, ... its Burning MORE calories.... Sometimes you need to mix some common sense with Science... No Offense to anyone. intended.
__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
How can a fuel with lower BTUs per gallon have MORE calories? Both are units of energy. Alcohol is a low-energy fuel compared to gasoline, which is why you need more of it.
Apparently, you're confusing "calories" with "volume". Because alcohol has less energy per gallon, it takes more gallons of fuel for the engine to work AS HARD (make the same horsepower) as that same engine on gasoline. This may translate to richer jetting, or greater throttle opening, which you're mistaking as "working harder". |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
62' Lemans, Nostalgia Super Stock, 541 CI, IA2 block, billet 4.5" crank, Ross, Wide port Edelbrocks, Gustram intake, 2 4150 style BLP carbs, 2.10 Turbo 400, 9" w/4:30 gears, 8.76 @153, 3100lbs |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Methanol cars run considerably cooler that the same gasoline powered cars do, sprint cars for example need to put heat into the engines with a heating unit even in the summer time before they are fired up initially. The same cooling system that will support a alcohol fired race car, will be inadequate for the same engine run on gasoline.
Hot Rod magazine article: Quote:
Alcohol by nature cools the entire intake tract as well as carrying O2 in it's mixture into the combustion chamber. The cooling effect, plus the added O2 is how it beats gasoline under the same conditions to maximum power. The valves will be cooler with alcohol than gasoline, as soon as you start adding alcohol the intake tract is cooler. Having delivered a ton of E10 and seen it blended, fuel companies use most ethanol to choose what the octane will be in a given blend. The gasoline is low octane as they can make it, and still have a certain specific gravity. The Ethanol is blended to give the octane to whatever the finished product is specified for. Without ethanol, the base gasoline will be more expensive as with pure gasoline, the lighter hydrocarbons are solely used to determine the octane rating. Alcohol, or alcohol blends, will not run an engine hotter than straight gasoline. It is also a drier fuel that has less lubrication ability, same as propane, it will cause valve, and valve seat recession. Hopefully this information can settle the dispute.
__________________
Brad Yost 1973 T/A (SOLD) 2005 GTO 1984 Grand Prix 100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway? If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated Last edited by Sirrotica; 02-18-2023 at 11:20 AM. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sirrotica For This Useful Post: | ||
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Concerning the valve seat recession issue. I have a student's 1968 400 in class now. Stock rebuild. It had 1 of the 16 valve seats with noticeable valve seat recession. It was an end cylinder exhaust seat. This surprised me a little. Seat area was hammered to a about a .160" wide seat vs. the normal .060-.080" factory width. We re-cut that seat with a 3 angle cutter to the .055" width. It made the stem height about .050" tall on the recessed seat. We adjusted for that and moved on. Pontiac's don't seem to be as bad as other brands for valve recession. Small Block Chevies are the worst. The center 2 side by side exhaust ports will get so bad the entire valve ends up inside the bowl. New seats are the minimum required. Generally, they crack the casting as well and you just throw the junk Chevy heads in the garbage where they belong. That's why they sell thousands of sets of replacement Chevy iron replacement heads every year from dozens of different vendors. By the time you fix 2 recessed valve seats you can have a complete set of bolt on Chevy replacement heads. Pontiac, no decent options.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post: | ||
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Jeff |
The Following User Says Thank You to geeteeohguy For This Useful Post: | ||
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Worthless without a photo. 1/4" recessed !! Sounds like really bad rocker geometry would indicate a problem. |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
When valve guides get loose the loose valve is able to only hit on a small portion of the edge of both the valve face, and seat. Loose guides are going to hasten recession of both seat faces.
There is no doubt that removing lead from the fuel added to wear of the guides, and valve faces since the early 70 in all brands. The early Pontiac heads never wore out guides at under 100,000 miles unless the owner ignored oil changes. In 1977 I had a customer that had just bought a 1977 Impala with a 305, I serviced the car regularly, and at 17,000 miles the guides in 2 cylinders were junk. The owner wasn't happy, and chevy dealer was of little help. the guides were so loose that it sounded like it needed the valves adjusted, they were slapping around so badly, constant ticking was the stem rocking in the guide. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sirrotica For This Useful Post: | ||
#57
|
||||
|
||||
There is really no brand of engine immune to this stuff. It's just typical engine wear and engine rebuilding 101. If you want to save a set of 50 year old iron heads, then new seats, guides, valves, are pretty much the norm and you'll have to start warming up to the fact of spending about $1500 to do it right. Any good competent machinist can put seats in your heads if need be.
If spending that kind of money rebuilding 50 year old iron heads doesn't sound appealing, then you have to start looking at aftermarket aluminum options. That's just the way it is. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#58
|
||||
|
||||
That's why I like to throw in a mix of AV fuel...for the lead. Its called lowlead but airplane mechanics say there's plenty of lead in it. I'm lucky enough to have a small airport nearby.
__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007 (cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD 1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.64 @ 87.3 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.25 60ft.Owned since 86' |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
From what I have heard, Pontiac engine & heads were cast with a higher Nickle content, making it a harder steel. Conversely, Chevy stuff is cast with a softer steel. Porting Chevy stuff is so mush easier than Pontiac.
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I've taken the heads off of 301 with 60,000 miles, the ridge was so bad you couldn't get the pistons out without a ridge reamer. The Iron Duke engines wore the bores out so quickly you could pull up to a GM car at a stop light with a 2.5 engine, and determine what engine it had just from the piston slap coming from it. The air cleaner had oil in the bottom of it due to the blowby being so excessive it couldn't be handled by the PCV system. One of GMs bone headed moves that made people swear off GM cars by saving a dollar, or two. by cheapening the alloy in the cast iron. In retrospect, cheating customers to improve the profit margin made money for a few years, until people quit buying their cars. Then the government (John Q Public, paid the bill) saved their butt with the bailout. One of the reasons I will never buy another new GM car. Looks like GM is going to hit the skids again in the near future, hopefully they just go out of business for good, no more bailouts. Mary Barra doesn't have as much sense as my dog has. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sirrotica For This Useful Post: | ||
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|