#1  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:08 AM
altfueler altfueler is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 21
Send a message via Yahoo to altfueler
Default OEM 3/4 WINDAGE TRAY OK WITH WARRIOR 4 BOLT MAINS CAPS?

MY 455, WHO SOMEONE ELSE BUILT PREVIOUS TO ME, HAS WARRIOR 4 BOLT MAIN CAPS, 74' SD RODS.

I YANKED THE ENGINE TO INSPECT, ETC, WHEN I REMOVED THE PAN, FOUND THE OEM 3/4 WINDAGE TRAY CRACKED IN TWO PIECES ALONG THE LEFT UPPER EDGE, THE PRESS-IN DIPSTICK TUBE & CRACKED DIPSTICK WERE ALSO FOUND IN THE PAN!! IS THE OEM 3/4 WINDAGE TRAY OK FOR THE WARRIOR 4 BOLT CAPS OR IS THERE A BETTER ALTERNATIVE FOR CLEARANCE?

THE TRAY WAS SHIMMED ABOUT 1/8" OFF THE CAPS, I CAN SHIM IT FURTHER, ABOUT 3/8" OFF THE CAPS.

BYT, ALL WINDAGE NUTS WERE TIGHT !

THANKS!

  #2  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:29 AM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 22,516
Default

Are you wondering if the main caps caused the problem?

The stock windage tray has a habit of breaking with exuberant use.

There are threads here on the windage tray breakage.


__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!

W.E.C moment


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
  #3  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:31 PM
Mr. P-Body Mr. P-Body is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,690
Default

Agreed with John. Those things are OLD. Metal fatigue has taken its toll. And the full-length ones are just as bad, if not worse.

Pacific Performance has a very nice duplicate of the original, but it's 50% thicker and not 40 years old.

For a really good upgrade, the Milodon tray/pan/pickup system is pretty tough to beat. I've been told the Canton is "just as good", but not IMO. The ones I've installed had fitment problems and are a bit flimsy compared to the Milodon.

Jim

  #4  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:53 PM
Region Warrior's Avatar
Region Warrior Region Warrior is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 6,613
Default

I'm with Mr P-Body.
Like the Milodon's better. Especially the new one.

__________________
If you cant drive from gas pump to gas pump across the map, its not a street car.


http://s207.photobucket.com/albums/b...hop/?start=100
  #5  
Old 09-05-2008, 02:03 PM
grnmnstr's Avatar
grnmnstr grnmnstr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,341
Default

Throw the tray in the garbage, don't bother with one.

Spend your money somewhere else, like on heads.

__________________
1978 Pontiac Grand LeMans.......out next year

Previous - 2001 Jerry Haas-built P/S Grand Am - former WJ car, Hoffman Racing 535" IA2, Tiger Heads/Intake, Single Dominator, PG
Best ET: 7.776 @ 175.94, 1.096 60', 2375 lbs.
  #6  
Old 09-05-2008, 04:39 PM
screamingchief's Avatar
screamingchief screamingchief is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: S.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 12,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. P-Body
Pacific Performance has a very nice duplicate of the original, but it's 50% thicker and not 40 years old.
That depends on the specific OE tray your comparing it too...

Food for thought.

Standard OE trays are .035" thick (20 ga.).
This is both the 3/4 and the full length trays.

The "5" factory trays are slightly thicker than those,these were the 455 cid trays.
These trays are only available in the 3/4's configuration.
They are .047" thick (18 ga.).

The aftermarket trays like the PPR tray are usually stated as .053" thick (17 ga. IIRC).

In percentages,the "Std" tray is appx. 66% of the aftermarket tray,thus the aftermarket tray is around 44% thicker than those.

And the "5" tray is appx. 88% of the aftermarket tray,thus the aftermarket tray is around 22% thicker than those.

In my experience,the thinner OE trays are much more failure prone than any of the others,also the failures almost always start along the scraper portion,and then "spread out" from there,so many who use those OE trays elect to remove the scraper portion as SOP and nip that problem area in the bud as they say.

And I fully agree these sheetmetal stampings do not necessarily improve with age like a fine vintage wine or such,so the new aftermarket trays make a ton of sense from that standpoint alone,that is if you choose to run a tray at all.

HTH.

__________________
This space for rent...

In the meantime,check out the cars HERE.

  #7  
Old 09-05-2008, 04:43 PM
Probird's Avatar
Probird Probird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Athens, Illinois
Posts: 3,221
Default

Ditto to grnmstr. Throw it in the trash and run wthout it. You won't notice any difference in et. You've personally seen what happens to them. Imagine if one of those pieces got hung up between a rod and the block. I've personally had that happen too. Since then I'm windage tray free.

  #8  
Old 09-05-2008, 06:05 PM
455firebird1969's Avatar
455firebird1969 455firebird1969 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 2,650
Default Take a file to it...

OEM trays are fine, as long as you make it fit well. Dont expect it to fit well on its own the way GM made it, you need to massage it. I normally shim mine with hardened washers to assure the tray does not contact anything...

Every tray I have ever had was stress cracked when it was manufactured. All you have to do is open up the inside radius of all the stamped openings. Open them far enough to remove the stressed metal, and then burnish it smooth...

I would not be surprised if the new ones show evidence of stressed metal too, any sheet metal part getting stamped during the manufacturing process is getting stretched (stressed). However the extra thickness of the new sheet metal trays will provide added strength to resist cracking...

Most importantly with a factory stamped tray, you have to ensure it fits well, without bending (stressing) it as it gets tightened down. I don’t care how thick the sheet metal is, if you stress sheet metal and expose it to vibrations, its going to crack…

__________________
1969 Firebird, Tx3-455/468 machined by CVMS
E-heads by Dave Wilcox/Comp Cams 300B-6 flat solid
850DP on E-85 by Eric Niefert/T2 1" plastic spacer
T-400/PTC 4000/390's/30x9 Hoosier radial slicks,#3400
1.38 60' 6.32 @ 108 MPH at Northeast Dragway NC 5/23/15 (9th pass on new engine)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ePCu2v...ature=youtu.be

1.37 60' 6.26 @ 109 half track, 9.86 @ 136 1/4 mile, #3350 11/26/16 at Richmond Dragway (125th pass on new engine)
  #9  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:28 PM
Big Injun's Avatar
Big Injun Big Injun is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 2,368
Default PPR Tomahawk Windage Tray



For most applications the Pacific Performance Racing Tomahawk windage tray is the best available option...and at $79.95 more than 1,000 trays have been sold in the last 1 1/2 years.

You can do without one but you cannot do better. It is THICKER than stock and is CAD plated.

There is a Tomahawk windage tray tucked nicely under my Milodon oil pan (in my sig pic).

__________________
Dave "Big Injun" Anderson
[email protected]
www.4mypontiac.com
For GTO Celebration items click the tile coaster.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017