Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-07-2004, 06:39 PM
trans am ed trans am ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32
Default

does anyone run this cam, i'm am thinking of runinng this cam in a 461 with 6x-4 port to flow 250cfm. this will go in a 2nd. gen t.a. thanks

  #2  
Old 10-07-2004, 06:39 PM
trans am ed trans am ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32
Default

does anyone run this cam, i'm am thinking of runinng this cam in a 461 with 6x-4 port to flow 250cfm. this will go in a 2nd. gen t.a. thanks

  #3  
Old 10-08-2004, 05:11 AM
evilpeanut evilpeanut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bear, DE
Posts: 91
Default

I was wondering how this cam would be on the street. I know it would be on the edge but doable?. How much compression would you need?

  #4  
Old 10-08-2004, 05:44 AM
APACHE APACHE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wauconda IL USA
Posts: 57
Default

Isn't the 290B a solid cam?

I think your compression will not be adequate enough to run this cam effectively.

Why not consider a Lunati ground by Harold at Lunati - the 255/263 ground on a 110 LSA would be a better fit. According to Harold if you are close to 10:1 the cam will respond well to a loose converter or 4 speed, headers and a large enough carb.

There are alot of PY board members who have experience with this cam (255/263) and maybe they can give you some feedback also?

__________________
Reliving my old man's glory days: street racing his '62 Savoy 413 wedge Eastbound on Dempster Rd.....any takers?
  #5  
Old 10-08-2004, 06:33 AM
Mr. P-Body Mr. P-Body is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,690
Default

Greg Miller's 461/'66 Catalina went 8.0s in the 1/8th (4,250 lbs. without driver) with 3.55 gears and TH200-4R with this cam and 6X heads. It made 439 RWHP. Changing to E-heads (mildly ported), it made 479 RWHP (all on 93 octane).
Great cam, indeed!

  #6  
Old 10-08-2004, 06:43 AM
PONTIAC DUDE's Avatar
PONTIAC DUDE PONTIAC DUDE is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 14,756
Default

Not to create a pi$$in contest but.......To big a cam for the street or compression is an overworked theory.
I call it a........<span class="ev_code_RED">Urban Legend</span>
I have been running & building lower compression engines with massive hyd, solids and rollers for years. It's all in the package.

Smaller cubic inch engine packages are more difficult to do though.

  #7  
Old 10-08-2004, 11:31 AM
bmpmdf bmpmdf is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pacific, Mo. USA
Posts: 1,449
Default

That Lunati cam screams!!! I replaced the Comp 290 with that Lunati, and even though I have not gotten it to the track, it feels like it has more torque. More responsive anyway.

__________________
Have A Great Day
  #8  
Old 10-08-2004, 03:03 PM
evilpeanut evilpeanut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bear, DE
Posts: 91
Default

I spoke with Steve at Lunati and he said I could get away with the 255/263 at 110 LSA as well. I might go with that one. Should sound mean!

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017