Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2006, 03:45 PM
77TA 77TA is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,804
Default power loss thru 9 " rear

I have read that the 9" uses about 3% more power than a GM 10 or 12 bolt. Has anyone confirmed this either on a chassy dyno or track ?

Thanks

  #2  
Old 01-02-2006, 03:59 PM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

3% ???

Why would you be concerned about 3% ??? Just curious.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #3  
Old 01-02-2006, 04:00 PM
Jack Gifford's Avatar
Jack Gifford Jack Gifford is offline
formerly 'Pontiac Jack'
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phelps, NY 14532
Posts: 10,341
Default

It's a fact. No need to confirm by testing. If you search out some gear-train engineering info, you'll see how efficiency of a hypoid gearset varies with the fundamental design values- centerline offsets, etc. The Ford's straddle-mounted pinion attains great strength at the expense of some inefficiency.

  #4  
Old 01-02-2006, 05:29 PM
R 70 Judge's Avatar
R 70 Judge R 70 Judge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,909
Default

One of my old cars lost a full tenth in the 1/4 by going from a weak 3rd gen F-body rear to a currie 9". Gear ratio was very similar 3.73 vs. 3.70.

Definitely takes more power to run one.

__________________
James
1970 Trans Am

Spotts Built 484" IA2, Highports, EFI Northwind, E85
Holley Terminator X sequential EFI fabrication and suspension by
https://www.funkhouserracecars.com/
  #5  
Old 01-02-2006, 06:48 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Myers, Fl.
Posts: 9,717
Default

R70- was it worth it knowing you weren't going to blow it up?

  #6  
Old 01-02-2006, 07:19 PM
rfb92345's Avatar
rfb92345 rfb92345 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 38
Send a message via Yahoo to rfb92345
Default

I have often thought about this myself. There are special gear carriers allowing you to run 12 bolt gears in a 9", or something like that. I refer back to Brians question of why would you be concerned about 3%. The cost of building one of these low drag 9" rears or even a 12 bolt or Dana 60, gets expensive real fast. I think I could take the money I saved and make up that 3% in the motor a whole lot easier. I think some of this stuff has merit when building a total package within the constaints of a rule book, but like Brian says, why is it of concern in a bracket car. I'm with ponjohn, also, I'd just rather know that its going to hold together, I'll get the 3% somewhere else cheaper.

  #7  
Old 01-02-2006, 08:18 PM
screamingchief's Avatar
screamingchief screamingchief is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: S.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 12,788
Default

Not every 9" ford rear is bulletproof...


Especially if your refering to OE cases,you better know how to choose the right ones or you could learn about this the hard way.


The folks most concerned with this issue are those looking for every .001-.0001 of ET,and have optimized virtually every other option available to them within the rules of the class they race in.

Say super stock or comp eliminator classes.

The area of concern in stock 9" carriers is the pinion support bearing casting,some of the stock cases are way too thin and too weak to risk in hi-po use,aftermarket cases are far superior to even the OE "N" cases,which are the best OE choice.

And yes strange does offer a drop out 12 bolt centersection to fit a 9" ford rear housing,solves the "3%" issue for those who need to be concerned enough to think about this.

Here are a couple pics to show the weak area for the 9" and such,and some info on the 12 bolt dropout deal.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	carriers.jpg
Views:	222
Size:	59.5 KB
ID:	37478   Click image for larger version

Name:	carrier close-up.jpg
Views:	225
Size:	39.7 KB
ID:	37479   Click image for larger version

Name:	148_0304_nine_6a_z.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	37.8 KB
ID:	37480   Click image for larger version

Name:	075.jpg
Views:	228
Size:	98.4 KB
ID:	37481  

  #8  
Old 01-02-2006, 09:05 PM
rfb92345's Avatar
rfb92345 rfb92345 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 38
Send a message via Yahoo to rfb92345
Default

No they aren't. We have built a few using a Strange case and 35 spline axles. Around here you can pick up a bare housing for next to nothing then add aftermarket everything. Although not cheap by any means, seems like a 9" is cheaper than building a Dana or 12 bolt, if you are starting from scratch.

  #9  
Old 01-02-2006, 09:09 PM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

I recently purchased a Strange differential...9" Pro Iron case with 35 spline spool and Pro gears...$1200 shipped.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #10  
Old 01-02-2006, 09:29 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

I used to do parasitic loss testing at one time as part of my Aerodynamic job in Truck Operations.

We used to put torque meters on the driveshaft and the wheels and test the vehicles.

The 3% is real. GM definately has a more fuel efficient design but I will take the strength of the 9" over any 12 bolt anyday. Ford still has Sterling Axle which even today makes the vast majority of the 9" geat sets for NASCAR. Might be others stickers but the gears are typically SA stuff.

JMO

I have several of the Strange carriers and Strange was picked to machine all of the SVO motorsports pieces. Takes a lot to be an OEM supplier.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #11  
Old 01-02-2006, 10:00 PM
77TA 77TA is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,804
Default

Thanks for the replies.. I was just checking my information.


  #12  
Old 01-02-2006, 11:28 PM
R 70 Judge's Avatar
R 70 Judge R 70 Judge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponjohn
R70- was it worth it knowing you weren't going to blow it up?
It was very nice to know that no matter what I did to it, there was no way I would break it. -- The exact same reason I purchased one for my current project. --> Strange pro nodular center, Back braced, 4.10 spool, 33 spline Moser axles, Wilwood discs.

__________________
James
1970 Trans Am

Spotts Built 484" IA2, Highports, EFI Northwind, E85
Holley Terminator X sequential EFI fabrication and suspension by
https://www.funkhouserracecars.com/

Last edited by R 70 Judge; 01-02-2006 at 11:35 PM.
  #13  
Old 01-03-2006, 12:17 AM
77TA 77TA is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,804
Default

What about the dana 60 is it less efficient than the GM's as well ?

How about the Ford 8.8 I hear they are pretty tuff.


Thanks

  #14  
Old 01-03-2006, 04:02 AM
Karch Karch is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 1,391
Default

Does the front pinion bearing on the 9" help with the deflection at all? I have always thought that front bearing offered a lot of support.

__________________
How many of you have driven over 340?
  #15  
Old 01-03-2006, 08:59 AM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,899
Default

I purchased the Dana60 from Strange Engenieering for it's efficient design qualities and price. Seems like a 12-Bolt exterior with a Dana60 interior. I like t.

__________________
95 Towncar that needs more TQ.
Sold 2023: 12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct
Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct
Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017