Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2006, 05:54 PM
GTOster GTOster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Horsham PA
Posts: 50
Default Stupid Question on Driveshaft

67 GTO
Car has been apart for 2 years and am getting around to putting her back together
dropped the motor and trans and exhaust system in today
Now for the stupid question
Which end of the driveshaft goes towards the trans
the fat end or the smaller end
I have been looking in a restoration and a shop manual and can't find it anywhere any help would be great
Thank you in advance
Paul

  #2  
Old 07-01-2006, 07:49 PM
jeffhhs76's Avatar
jeffhhs76 jeffhhs76 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: long Island
Posts: 360
Default

Smaller end (yolk) to trans. Larger end to rear U-joint

  #3  
Old 07-02-2006, 01:58 PM
engineer engineer is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 6,016
Default

have it with the balance weights to the front of the car, usually fat end to the front.

  #4  
Old 07-02-2006, 02:21 PM
400 4spd.'s Avatar
400 4spd. 400 4spd. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Eastern N.C.
Posts: 4,891
Default

I'll be the tie breaker. I have 3 assembled 67 shafts out in my shop, and all have the yoke on the "fat" end. The long tapered end goes to the rear.

  #5  
Old 07-02-2006, 08:58 PM
GTOster GTOster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Horsham PA
Posts: 50
Default

Got to look at a 67 today and the fat end goes to the trans
Thank you all
Time to set the body back on the frame
Paul

  #6  
Old 07-03-2006, 07:35 AM
Shadowjack Shadowjack is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,696
Default

Just browsing through the August issue of HPP and the lead letter is from Keith Seymour, who was a GM driveline development engineer for many years, and he states that the reason driveshafts are different sizes on the ends is very simple: so they could use an existing yoke. Driveshaft diameter is determined by "critical-speed requirements", and has to be strong enough in the middle so it won't jump and flex, but it doesn''t need to be that big at the ends. Therefore, if a larger yoke didn't already exist, there was no reason to tool one up. Much cheaper to swedge the shaft down.
So unless originality is a factor, maybe there's no real reason to keep track of it.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017