Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2010, 08:35 AM
grandprixaust grandprixaust is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 41
Default

great thread! finding information on these motors in Australia is incredibly hard. most people usually say " put a Chev in her instead" , which is something i myself would never do.

im curious with the rear main seal still though, is there any further information about avoiding the leaking ?

  #2  
Old 03-16-2010, 07:07 PM
Red Coupe's Avatar
Red Coupe Red Coupe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandprixaust View Post
great thread! finding information on these motors in Australia is incredibly hard. most people usually say " put a Chev in her instead" , which is something i myself would never do.

im curious with the rear main seal still though, is there any further information about avoiding the leaking ?
Pictures will be forthcoming along with description soon.

__________________
"Pay no attention to the planet Mopar. It is a strange and confusing place."
~Chiphead
  #3  
Old 03-25-2010, 06:30 PM
Red Coupe's Avatar
Red Coupe Red Coupe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 227
Default

Here’s a better description of several points that I made earlier in this thread on how to rebuild a Pontiac V-8. Some of you asked how to check thrust bearing clearance. Others wanted to know about the potential for rear main seal leaks due to machining errors.





This first picture shows how to check thrust bearing clearance using a feeler gauge. The concept is the same no matter how you do it; you need to rock the crank back and forth to make sure you have enough, but not too much, free play in the crank. Measure between the face of the bearing insert and the crank. In case of Pontiac V-8s, you are looking for .003 to .009 thrust bearing clearance. On Pontiac motors, the thrust bearing is installed in the #4 main bearing bore (not all V-8s are the same.)



Here's another way to check thrust bearing clearance. This method is a little more precise. What you need to do is set up a dial gauge that is zeroed out when the crank is pressed all the way towards the back of the block. When you pry (gently) the crank back and forth, you can directly read the clearance value off the dial gauge.



This picture shows the machine work around the rear main. You can see the groove where the rear main seal fits. In some cases, the factory didn't get the machine work perfectly concentric around the crank, and I’ll explain why this can cause a problem.




In this picture, you can see the use of a vernier caliper to measure the depth of the rear main seal groove on the driver’s side of the block. The next picture shows the same measurement on the passenger’s side of the block.




If the rear main seal groove was not concentric around the center line of the crank, the two readings will be different. Apparently when the factory installed the original asbestos style rear main seals back in the 60s and 70s this was not a problem. With the newer style seals, the ability to compensate for variations in machine work isn’t as good, and this problem can lead to a nasty leak. My machinist says he has only seen this error on 455 blocks. Nonetheless, once burned, twice shy, so he always checks when working on a Pontiac motor.

__________________
"Pay no attention to the planet Mopar. It is a strange and confusing place."
~Chiphead
  #4  
Old 03-25-2010, 07:25 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 6,347
Default

Minor corrections/additions to a wonderful post:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Coupe View Post
If the rear main seal groove was not concentric around the center line of the crank, the two readings will be different.
The two readings could be identical and the seal "could" still not be concentric. This could happen if the seal groove is displaced too high or too low rather than too far to the left or right.

Better measure top 'n' bottom, too. You'd have four measurement points that better all be about the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Coupe View Post
Apparently when the factory installed the original asbestos style rear main seals back in the 60s and 70s this was not a problem. With the newer style seals, the ability to compensate for variations in machine work isn’t as good, and this problem can lead to a nasty leak. My machinist says he has only seen this error on 455 blocks. Nonetheless, once burned, twice shy, so he always checks when working on a Pontiac motor.
It's not a matter of asbestos vs. modern seals. It's a matter of "Rope" seals which may or may not be asbestos vs. lip seals which can be neoprene, Viton, or some other "rubber" material. A lip seal has a very limited range of allowable misalignment with the shaft, AND they need a fairly smooth surface for the lip to ride against.

Of course, you aren't going to buy an asbestos seal any more; I think the modern rope seals are a fiberglass material. And they don't seem to work as well as the genuine asbestos material--but--the EPA and OSHA frown on asbestos. Even so, if you have a block/cap that has the seal groove not concentric with the crank centerline--rope seals are your best friend.

I don't like rope seals except for agricultural or industrial use where the seal has to deal with abrasives--such as a pump used on "contaminated" liquids. (So I avoid using them on automotive engines where there shouldn't be any abrasive in the oil) Sometimes there's no choice, though--either the seal groove isn't concentric (some Pontiacs and perhaps others) or the crankshaft isn't smooth enough for a lip seal to rub against and live.

  #5  
Old 04-02-2010, 11:37 AM
grandprixaust grandprixaust is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 41
Default

great photos and info! thanks !

if the crank was freshly machined would that mean it would have a smoother surface for the lip seal ?

  #6  
Old 04-02-2010, 06:25 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 6,347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandprixaust View Post
if the crank was freshly machined would that mean it would have a smoother surface for the lip seal ?
No. No crank grinder I know has a thin enough grinding wheel to do the sealing surface.

Some cranks are deliberately stamped with a pattern of "hash marks" that looks like
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
all around the sealing surface; that helps the rope seal do it's job; but it's not good for lip seals. I polish the hash marks (if they exist) with emery cloth to smooth them some. You'll never polish them completely away. Other times, the rubber lip wears a groove in the crankshaft just like the front seal can wear a groove in the hub of the damper. Then you either need a special seal that has a re-positioned lip; or you're back to packing rope.

  #7  
Old 04-25-2010, 09:50 AM
tjdjr's Avatar
tjdjr tjdjr is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: union city, pa.
Posts: 567
Default

When you broke in the cam did you only use a single valve spring ?

  #8  
Old 11-05-2012, 03:22 PM
OINK 1's Avatar
OINK 1 OINK 1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,060
Default Jeses !

Port the heads !!

__________________
Greg Merrick
  #9  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:56 AM
Nicks67GTO Nicks67GTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Waterloo, Ia
Posts: 2,895
Default

subbd for future refrence

Nice post!

  #10  
Old 11-06-2012, 11:25 AM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 16,224
Default

Using any type of sealant or surface prep on head gaskets depends entirely on the type of gasket used. Most go dry these days, FYI.

Ring Gaps - Follow the ring manufacturer's recommendations, and check for any notes that came with the pistons.

Most rod bearings for Pontiacs are now chamfered on both sides.

Here's the one thread I recall, Chiphead made a good post:

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...+assembly+tips

Now I exclusively use assembly lube during assembly. Not sure if I commented on cleaning cyl walls with WD-40 or not. Trans fluid works too. Floating pins get oil. Gasket surfaces get wiped with thinner or acetone prior to assembly. I do the same for block and rods prior to inserting bearings. Use lint-free rags. Anti-seize on timing cover studs.
.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017