Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2010, 12:06 AM
pontiac6269's Avatar
pontiac6269 pontiac6269 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sparta,WI USA
Posts: 773
Default 68-69 Proportion Valve Front Disc, Rear Drum?

The 68-69 proportion valve that mounts to the master cylinder on disc brake cars, is this needed? My car also has the brass valve mounted to frame where the brake light switch is plugged in, is this a proportion valve too? The valve that mounts to the master cylinder leaks, I'd rather eliminate it and just have the one on the frame. I don't think 70 and up used this valve? Would I have to get a different proportion valve if I remove it? Will the one on the frame work without it? My 69 GTO has power front disc and rear drum brakes.

Thanks,
Eric

__________________
Eric

1969 GTO - 461, turbo 400, Continental 13", 3.08 gears. - 12.59 e.t. @ 108.43 mph, 1.898 60'

1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- 461, turbo 350, PTC 3500 converter, 9" 3:50 gears. = 11.39 e.t. @ 117.55 mph, 1.599 60' on E85
  #2  
Old 03-28-2010, 08:13 AM
gto4evr gto4evr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster NY
Posts: 3,553
Default

Eric,

The 68/69 "valve" on the frame is just a distribution block with the low pressure sensor for the brake light and has nothing to do with pressure regulation between front and rear. You do need that valve up on the master. The reason the later models don't have it up on the master is that the proportioning valve was moved down to where your distribution block is incorporating both functions into one piece. You can get one of the later versions but you will have to change your brake lines as the prop/distribution combo piece is completely different and the line positions/orientations are different.

The bright side is the later versions are quite a bit easier to find and much cheaper than the master mounted ones if you're not worried about originality. I think I may have a few kicking around in a box out back.

Later,
Dennis

  #3  
Old 03-28-2010, 03:19 PM
pontiac6269's Avatar
pontiac6269 pontiac6269 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sparta,WI USA
Posts: 773
Default

Thanks Dennis,

Does the 70 and up proportion valve mount in the same location as the 68-9 distribution block? My lines are all new. Are the fittings the same? Are the lines in the same area to were I might be able to bend and tweak to get them to work? I may be interested in a later version if you want to part with one.

Thanks,
Eric

__________________
Eric

1969 GTO - 461, turbo 400, Continental 13", 3.08 gears. - 12.59 e.t. @ 108.43 mph, 1.898 60'

1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- 461, turbo 350, PTC 3500 converter, 9" 3:50 gears. = 11.39 e.t. @ 117.55 mph, 1.599 60' on E85
  #4  
Old 03-28-2010, 05:43 PM
gto4evr gto4evr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster NY
Posts: 3,553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pontiac6269 View Post
Thanks Dennis,

Does the 70 and up proportion valve mount in the same location as the 68-9 distribution block? My lines are all new. Are the fittings the same? Are the lines in the same area to were I might be able to bend and tweak to get them to work? I may be interested in a later version if you want to part with one.

Thanks,
Eric
Eric, actually I'm near positive 70 was the same as 68/69. The 71 and up valve mounts on the frame in the same area however the bolt pattern is different as that combo valve is much bigger. It also bolts to a bracket that bolts to the frame instead of directly to the frame like the 68-70/71-72 non power block does. You can get away with just using the front bolt hole on the newer powervalve to go to the frame hole where the old one mounted. In some cases that's more desirable anyways since mounting it on the bracket brings it closer to the exhaust manifold and could interfere if you've got headers on it. The fitting sizes change for the front line from master to valve and the angles change for the front left and right valve to wheel lines. If you bought new prebent lines you'll have to modify everything to use the newer style valve. here's a side by side comparison of them.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P0006740.jpg
Views:	238
Size:	42.3 KB
ID:	201493  

  #5  
Old 03-28-2010, 06:08 PM
mike nixon mike nixon is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: PORTLAND,IN,47371
Posts: 12,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pontiac6269 View Post
The 68-69 proportion valve that mounts to the master cylinder on disc brake cars, is this needed? My car also has the brass valve mounted to frame where the brake light switch is plugged in, is this a proportion valve too? The valve that mounts to the master cylinder leaks, I'd rather eliminate it and just have the one on the frame. I don't think 70 and up used this valve? Would I have to get a different proportion valve if I remove it? Will the one on the frame work without it? My 69 GTO has power front disc and rear drum brakes.

Thanks,
Eric

The unit on the master is not a Proportioning valve it's a hold off valve that allows the rear brakes to apply before the fronts to prevent nose diving during hard braking.

The unit on the frame is a distribution block on these years that divides the system up and turns the light on when pressure is lost on one end.

The 71 and newer units combine the hold off valves with the distribution block making them a true prop valve.

I've used them on every conversion I've done from drums to disc but have moved them away from the stock location to get away from exhaust heat.

Mike

__________________
so many pontiacs, so little time..................


moderator is a glorified word for an unappreciated prick..................


"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the
former." --Albert Einstein



"There is no such thing as a good tax."

"We contend that for a nation to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle."

- Winston Churchill
  #6  
Old 03-28-2010, 07:12 PM
pontiac6269's Avatar
pontiac6269 pontiac6269 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sparta,WI USA
Posts: 773
Default

I bent up and flared the lines myself. Looks like I should be able to bend them enough to get them to line up. Are the proportion valves the same for all GM A-bodies? A friend has a couple 71-2 Chevelles with power discs and the local salvage yard has three 71-2 Cutlass. As fars as years I was just going of how PY has them listed in the catalog, they list just 68-9, don't list 70. Thanks Dennis and Mike for your help.

Eric

__________________
Eric

1969 GTO - 461, turbo 400, Continental 13", 3.08 gears. - 12.59 e.t. @ 108.43 mph, 1.898 60'

1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- 461, turbo 350, PTC 3500 converter, 9" 3:50 gears. = 11.39 e.t. @ 117.55 mph, 1.599 60' on E85
  #7  
Old 03-28-2010, 07:26 PM
gto4evr gto4evr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster NY
Posts: 3,553
Default

yep, the chevelle/olds/buick's are the same.

  #8  
Old 03-31-2010, 02:28 AM
PaulatFast PaulatFast is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Batesville IN
Posts: 2,623
Default

The 71-72 bracket to mount the combination valve on the frame is available from Inline Tube for about 25.00. If you are doing a conversion on a 68-70 and want to keep the valve in the same location as the factory distribution block, you simply buy lines for a 71 disk/drum car and the bracket. The hold off valves are about 69.00 from m ost vendors...

__________________
Paul
FAST Automotive -The Pontiac restoration shop, not the fuel injection guys! I had the name first.

My site... needs updated-
www.fastrestorations.com


68 GTO's (RA II, RA I, HO, convert, Pro Street, Racecar, etc.), 2 69 GTO Judges, 70 GTO racecar -10.77 @ 124mph, 68 Tempest survivor, 3 03 Aztecs!
  #9  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:03 AM
newtoGTO newtoGTO is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 426
Default

To keep things simple you could just replace the hold off valve (prop valve) at the master cylinder with a stock 68 new reproduction one. Inline has the repro valve.

  #10  
Old 04-02-2010, 09:32 PM
motorcitymusclecar motorcitymusclecar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,082
Default

The valves are not all the same - they are very year specific and the fitting sizes change from year to year. These brake system work great with the righ combo of parts and not as good with a mess of different year parts.

67-68 had 4 piston calipers so the valving was different. 69 had single piston but still the 2 part rotor, 70 actuall had 3 valves - don't forget the correction valve in the back of the car. 71-72 joined the pieces together only on disc cars. There are also different spring rates in each of the valves.

here is a good link to tell you the history and the difference in the valves.

http://www.inlinetube.com/install%20...y%20Valves.htm

  #11  
Old 04-04-2010, 01:47 PM
pontiac6269's Avatar
pontiac6269 pontiac6269 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sparta,WI USA
Posts: 773
Default

Thanks everyone. Ok, my 69 has the tall spindles, calipers, rotors and brake lines from a 78 Firebird. Will this work ok with the stock hold off valve? I may just buy a new one, then I don't have to mess with lines.

Thanks,
Eric

__________________
Eric

1969 GTO - 461, turbo 400, Continental 13", 3.08 gears. - 12.59 e.t. @ 108.43 mph, 1.898 60'

1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- 461, turbo 350, PTC 3500 converter, 9" 3:50 gears. = 11.39 e.t. @ 117.55 mph, 1.599 60' on E85
  #12  
Old 04-05-2010, 10:30 AM
motorcitymusclecar motorcitymusclecar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,082
Default

Work and function correctly are 2 different things - the car will stop with no valve - how good ? - now you have opened a new can a worms.

the spindle -
1. now you can no longer use the stock upper a-arm and have to go to an afthermarket one $500+/-
2. what brake hose do you plan to use the 78 caliper may be metric.
3. hope you are not running stock ralley wheels - they wont fit - and since the rotor is metric - either will the lug nuts.
In the late 70's they tried this thing called the Metric System - but just for a couple of years and then changed it back - It was just long enough to introduce all these metric parts for added confusion.

Fall all the money youe will have to make this system work right - you could buy the most expensive stock system on the market "NEW" and be cheaper.

I guess you have to decide if you are looking for cheap disc brakes or turning this car into something it is not - 78 firebird.

  #13  
Old 04-05-2010, 11:55 AM
rolling money pits's Avatar
rolling money pits rolling money pits is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,662
Default

^^

one thing to note, the rotors do not have metric threads.

all 2nd gen front rotors have standard thread pitch. only two part numbers for them with the difference being a larger outer wheel bearing which coincided with the 78 model year, IIRC.

what IS metric on the brakes is the caliper banjo bolt. but since the calipers have the same mounting from 70 to 81, youre free to use whatever you desire.

the orientation of the brake hose varied as well, but i believe that also came to pass when they switched from standard to metric banjo bolt.

my memory isnt what it used to be, but i think doing the F-body tall spindle swap required the use of grand prix brake hoses and/or outer tie rod ends.

__________________
costs too much
  #14  
Old 04-05-2010, 09:07 PM
pontiac6269's Avatar
pontiac6269 pontiac6269 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sparta,WI USA
Posts: 773
Default

Tubular upper a-arms were $200 from a local street rod chassis builder, using stock lower a arms. All parts are new but for a 78 Firebird. All parts bolted on fine. All metal brake lines were bent and flared by me. Everything is together and on the car. I'm using 15" x 7 ralley wheel. The distrubution block is the factory one. I just need the hold off valve, as mine is leaking. If the stock style hold of valve will work with what I have, I'll buy a new one, if not I'll switch to the 71 and up proportion valve. The only thing original to the car is the transmission, so I'm not worried about keeping it original. So will the stock style hold off valve work?

__________________
Eric

1969 GTO - 461, turbo 400, Continental 13", 3.08 gears. - 12.59 e.t. @ 108.43 mph, 1.898 60'

1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- 461, turbo 350, PTC 3500 converter, 9" 3:50 gears. = 11.39 e.t. @ 117.55 mph, 1.599 60' on E85
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017