| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's one hell of a "Bathtub".!!
More like a watering tank for livestock !
__________________
ECM member. 2008 Outlaw Pontiac Drag Series Champion MANDRA Do it now fool! Life is short. 69 Grand Prix/3163lbs / IAII 535 w/ Tiger heads by Gaydosh....9.35@ 144 so far.. through mufflers. 1.26 60'. Going back to track with pump gas engine.... My 60 Ventura retired to street/strip duty.. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It is 2-3 inches taller than the stock intake set up.
__________________
Lynn McCarty dba/McCarty Racing www.RamAirV.com [email protected] www.ChemicalManagementIndiana.com 317-260-3486 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah we need watering for all those horses!!!!!!
__________________
Lynn McCarty dba/McCarty Racing www.RamAirV.com [email protected] www.ChemicalManagementIndiana.com 317-260-3486 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
DID ANY ONE SEE LYNN'S HEADS AT NORWALK. I LOOKED BUT COULD NOT FIND THEM. JERRY S
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does the single plane have any kind of boss for mounting a near stock look throttle cable bracket. Any new word from your header guy on headers for the early models like the 65 or any new word for any headers
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
intake without top
__________________
Lynn McCarty dba/McCarty Racing www.RamAirV.com [email protected] www.ChemicalManagementIndiana.com 317-260-3486 |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
BAD AZZ!!!
__________________
69 GTO 11:[email protected] all balls no bottle 406 d-port iron heads 3700lbs all steel |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
V stuff is so freaking cool!
__________________
James 1970 Trans Am Spotts Built 484" IA2, Highports, EFI Northwind, E85 Holley Terminator X sequential EFI fabrication and suspension by https://www.funkhouserracecars.com/ |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
This intake with a flat top should be close to the stock height. I will publish numbers as soon as I can.
__________________
Lynn McCarty dba/McCarty Racing www.RamAirV.com [email protected] www.ChemicalManagementIndiana.com 317-260-3486 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://www.bopengineering.com/rav_du...bottom_b.shtml
Tom Vaught ps Most would never say that I was Polite, (like polar)
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Tom and others
So these obviously dont use a Std RAV bolt pattern for the intake then as there looks to be no material in the flange for an outboard bolt at either end ?? Hmmmmmm........ This picture of the head shows what looks like additional bolts as well as the outboard factory locations Maybe this is how the TR intake bolts up using these and not the outer factory location
__________________
Working on going faster (and now staying dry at the same time !!) Last edited by 455-4+1; 07-18-2010 at 05:13 PM. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
All these intakes will have the stock Pontiac bolt pattern. We are doing the front water neck cross over separately since all our RA-Vs will have reverse cooling. We will also have the ability to use regular flow cooling. More pictures soon.
I took the intake to BES and Tony likes it! We are starting to finish up the first RA-V crate motor in the next couple of weeks.
__________________
Lynn McCarty dba/McCarty Racing www.RamAirV.com [email protected] www.ChemicalManagementIndiana.com 317-260-3486 |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Separate water crossover I am OK with and having a "short flange" outboard of the front runners. From what I have seen with stock RAV intakes 3 of the holes are above the lines of the port with the two outboard ones slightly lower From the tunnel ram pics it looks like there is no flange in that location. Hence my query about the two extra "non Pontiac" holes lower toward the deck inboard of the outer runners ? These must be redundent or for some other purpose as they arnt in the "stock location" Possibly for a future blower mainifold ?? I would have thought that the TR would have required a longer flange at the rear to pick up the rear factory bolt location (This would typicaly be the same offset from the outer runner at the front to allow heads to be swapped from side to side) Hopefully I am missing some thing simple here
__________________
Working on going faster (and now staying dry at the same time !!) |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lynn, nice article on your 'Crate Engines' in Pontiac Enthusiast magazine.
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! W.E.C moment "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
The mounting holes aren't cast-in, so with enough meat in the head, they can be drilled and tapped anywhere you want them...just a matter of changing the program on the machine.
__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brian:
To use you own words Oh, for the love of Christ. ![]() What part about of Lynn’s statement is so hard to understand? Quote:
Use them or don't use them. It is not up to me. Hope he and the parts do great, but 455-4+1 asked a simple question based on Lynn’s statement and for 2 pages he has been getting partial answers. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brian B, you cannot put your holes anywhere you want, only between the runners it looks like.
You might could stack or stagger and get 4 holes per side, but I wouldn't want to run it with only two bolts per side. The end runner may be thick enough to counter bore into it some, but until I see one mounted I'm as confused as several others how he intends to secure it. On the previous page Lynn said Quote:
Edit: Typing at the same time as BrianS it seems. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
See this? I see all 5 factory mounting locations, plus two more. What's the problem?
__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
See this? I see a prototype intake that is not the final product, but it still has room for the center mounting hole between the two runners. Yes, on the left of the shot there doesn't appear to be enough meat for the outboard mounting hole, but Lynn has said "All these intakes will have the stock Pontiac bolt pattern. We are doing the front water neck cross over separately since all our RA-Vs will have reverse cooling. We will also have the ability to use regular flow cooling." I can't tell what is happening with the right side of the intake in the shot, but again...with enough meat in the head you can drill/tap the mounting holes anywhere you need them.
__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
For the love of Christ Brain (even though I am not a God faring man I may well soon have to turn to devine intervention to get an answer on this one)
YES I SEE THE HOLES IN THE HEAD !!!!!. I have commented on both the stock 5 upper holes and the two additional lower holes previously. No issue there Please tell me how you would fix the flange of the TR outboard of the rear port to "stock mounting location" hole "A" in the picture below Please tell me you are waiting for the Patent documents to arrive before divulging all to us on your magic "air flange restraint system". Or will it be like the header fix off an accessory mount hole for heads with the missing outer bolt hole and boss ?? The intake shown cannot use the "stock mounting locations". How hard was it for someone to say........... "we ommited the rear mounting flange to save money on the prototypes" "we ommited the rear mounting flange to make the prototypes shorther so they would fit in a box we had" "we ommited the rear mounting flange on the prototype beacuse we intend to use the other two additional holes in the head to do their job and will use the out ones for another purpose" "we ommited the rear mounting flange on the prototypes because we forgot about them but lucky its only a prototype and we can alter the cores to include them on the production peices" Or whatever ???? I promise I wont ask again, I have obviuosly greatly oversimplified a very complex problem I just cant get my head around
__________________
Working on going faster (and now staying dry at the same time !!) |
| Reply |
|
|