Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-04-2010, 05:38 PM
Murf'sDad's Avatar
Murf'sDad Murf'sDad is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Simonds, N.B.
Posts: 2,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ITSBACK View Post
That was my reason for starting this thread. Whats the deal? Do I really have to use dished pistons with my 670 heads. I was at a car show Friday and talked to a couple of guys with 670 heads on their 67 GTO's like mine and they said they run great. I was reading Jim Hands book last night and he said the advertised 10-3/4:1 was an advertisement and that they where more like 10:1 maybe a touch higher. Did they not run great back then and my 428 put out 376hp. Why then with a bigger cam and my un ported 670's, headers, x-pipe,aluminum intake and 750 double pumper and bored .030 wont my motor run and put out 400-450hp? Some say 10.1:1 is optimum and others say 9:1.
I have a set of ported #13's on my engine. They cc out between 79 - 81. The block has been "zero decked". I measure it as about .002" "out of the hole". AS best as I can calculate is will come out at 9.8:1. With the UD cam I don't foresee having any problems with detonation on the 91 I can get around here, and get about 450 hp. If I could get 93 octane Sunoco I'd be truly golden.

Every engine is different. If you do a search you will find references to 11:1 aluminum head motors running happily on 87 and 9:1 iron headed engines that won't live on 91 with octane booster.

For the difference of 1 compression point you aren't going to lose any noticeable hp. From what I understand you pretty much can't run a 670 headed 428 on pump gas. If you want to keep the 670's, pull them off and open up the chambers a bit and drop from 10.5:1 to about 9.5:1. You'll be happier and you won't have to dish your pistons.

And while todays gas is cleaner it doesn't run nearly as good as the old stuff and it doesn't have quite the octane rating.

JMO, Stewart

__________________
1976 TA, nose converted to 1970 style, 406, ported #13 Heads, '70 iron intake without crossovers, Q-Jet - Cliff style, RARE OS manifolds, Pypes duals w/crossflow, UD 230/238 custom HR 4/7 swap cam with solid roller lifters , Hydro-Boost 4-wheel discs, 4 Speed, 3.23 posi.

“Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result.” - Winston Churchill
  #22  
Old 08-04-2010, 06:06 PM
Old Man Taylor's Avatar
Old Man Taylor Old Man Taylor is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Escondido, CA, USA
Posts: 6,944
Default

The highest Octane that I remember after they starting using the new ratings was 95.5. I was able to run 11.0:1 with that. As they got lower I had to reduce the CR to 10.5. I think that was at about 94 Octane. With 91 Octane (the highest we have in CA) I like to keep it at or below 9.5:1.

  #23  
Old 08-04-2010, 06:22 PM
ITSBACK's Avatar
ITSBACK ITSBACK is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NEW JERSEY
Posts: 2,757
Default

I think I am going to take all my stuff to my motor guy and let him figure it out.

  #24  
Old 08-04-2010, 06:39 PM
ITSBACK's Avatar
ITSBACK ITSBACK is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NEW JERSEY
Posts: 2,757
Default

What do you mean open up the chambers? Do you mean the combustion chamber to raise the CC's. What if I dish the pistons and when I am ready to get rid of the 670's, bolt on a set of 72cc e-heads?

  #25  
Old 08-04-2010, 06:50 PM
scoob's Avatar
scoob scoob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CLEARWATER,FL
Posts: 121
Default

for those in the clearwater , fl area there is a spur gas station on hercules near the airport that should be selling 100 octane from the pump in the next few months.

  #26  
Old 08-04-2010, 06:58 PM
FFD FFD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
I used to run Sunoco 280 gasoline, (this was the good stuff) before it was blended with the lower octane fuel (at the pump) to get 260, 240, etc.

Course you had to know the gas station owner really well and have access to the pure 280 gasoline (creative plumbing at the station). The owner was a circle track racer.

I never saw the 260 listed in my area below $.22 cents per gallon. You could get the other stuff for $.17 cents. 21 gallons times $.17 = $3.57 for gas per week.

$5.00 would get you a full tank of the good stuff ($.22 times 22 gallons = $4.84)

$5.00 per hour wages were high tech welding type jobs.

Tom Vaught
and something else when you filled up you got free stuff. Union 76 antenna balls.,B.C. glasses,Steak Knives in a bad part of Detroit never figured that one out. Were just some that come to mind. My favorite Reg. at .17 cents and in a wood case (24) bottles of Coke

  #27  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:06 PM
ITSBACK's Avatar
ITSBACK ITSBACK is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NEW JERSEY
Posts: 2,757
Default

Now you get gas and pay through the ... and some foreigner looks at you like your ruining his country.

  #28  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:26 PM
PONTIAC DUDE's Avatar
PONTIAC DUDE PONTIAC DUDE is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 14,756
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murf'sDad View Post
It isn't. The high octane, TEL containing gas of the '60's and early '70's would be about 95 - 96 octane by today's ratings. With that you could run your 10.5:1 compression iron heads.

, Stewart
You could also run 12-1 as GM, Mopar and Ford had a few of those out there running on Pump gas. Octane was 100 and 101 back then. Plus LEAD. Lead makes a big difference. The octane today of 93 is 89 and bumped to 93 with the crap ethanol. Not the same as gas.............. back in the day.

  #29  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:31 PM
Murf'sDad's Avatar
Murf'sDad Murf'sDad is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Simonds, N.B.
Posts: 2,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ITSBACK View Post
What do you mean open up the chambers? Do you mean the combustion chamber to raise the CC's. What if I dish the pistons and when I am ready to get rid of the 670's, bolt on a set of 72cc e-heads?
You can do that if you want. Dishing pistons is more expensive that pulling the heads and opening up the cambers to increase their volume thereby lowering the compression ratio. If you dish the pistons, the e-heads will probably have to be cut to raise the compression back up where you want it. Aluminum heads will take about another 1 to 1.5 points more compression ratio to equal iron heads because of the better heat dissipation.

Your choice, Stewart

__________________
1976 TA, nose converted to 1970 style, 406, ported #13 Heads, '70 iron intake without crossovers, Q-Jet - Cliff style, RARE OS manifolds, Pypes duals w/crossflow, UD 230/238 custom HR 4/7 swap cam with solid roller lifters , Hydro-Boost 4-wheel discs, 4 Speed, 3.23 posi.

“Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result.” - Winston Churchill
  #30  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:47 PM
My442 My442 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 595
Default

The gas back then smelled much different than today, and better in my opinion.

The Sunoco 260 I used to get was over 100 octane.

  #31  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:51 PM
kate`s67gto's Avatar
kate`s67gto kate`s67gto is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ontario canada
Posts: 1,925
Default

A Spur gas station sheesh i thought they were extinct. Must have been in the early 70's since i last saw on of those. There was one just south of my home town then.

__________________
Scott

If you always do what you always did
You always get what you always got
  #32  
Old 08-04-2010, 08:23 PM
ITSBACK's Avatar
ITSBACK ITSBACK is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NEW JERSEY
Posts: 2,757
Default

I can also get a ported set of 6x-4's for less than the e-heads. The aluminum just look so good and the technology is there to do as you please.

  #33  
Old 08-04-2010, 08:41 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

I remember the 60s Sunoco 260 fuel being 102 or 104 octane and the 280 Sunoco fuel being around 108-110 octane. Course this was leaded fuel too. And that was a RESEARCH Octane Number

Info:

"A numerical representation of the ability of a fuel to resist knocking when ignited in the cylinder of an internal-combustion engine. The octane number of a given fuel is determined by comparing the amount of knocking that fuel causes when combusted with the amount of knocking caused by two standard reference fuels, isooctane (which resists knocking and has an octane number of 100) and heptane (which causes knocking and has an octane number of 0). The octane number is then assigned as the percentage of isooctane required in a blend with normal heptane to match the knocking behavior of the fuel being tested."

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #34  
Old 08-04-2010, 10:06 PM
goatman65's Avatar
goatman65 goatman65 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pa.
Posts: 2,663
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by My442 View Post
The gas back then smelled much different than today, and better in my opinion.

The Sunoco 260 I used to get was over 100 octane.
I remember going to the Exxon station with my dad and filling up the his 66 GTO....i loved the smell.My dad had a 'tab' or 'bill' at that station that he would pay every month.The station also had 'free' air,not one of those air machines on a pole like now.It also had a service bay,the hose that rang the bell whrn you ran over it and 2 25 cent wash bays.

  #35  
Old 08-04-2010, 10:30 PM
MYGOAT's Avatar
MYGOAT MYGOAT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 239
Default

Don't know if they do this in the States but the refineries Down Under have different brews depending on the season.
Winter (cold weather) lower octane blend.
Summer (hot weather) higher octane blend
This is coming from the same pump.

  #36  
Old 08-05-2010, 01:12 AM
lust4speed's Avatar
lust4speed lust4speed is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Yucaipa, SoCal
Posts: 8,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. P-Body View Post
Gulf No-Nox (I remember the ad, John "If this Camaro won't knock on Gulf No-Nox, what makes you think YOUR Camaro will?"), Super Shell were "100 octane" at the pump. Each oil company had their own version of "premium" gas, but all were "leaded" AND 100. We didn't have Sonoco stations in California, but guys were known to drive to Las Vegas and bring back many gallons...

Jim
Yeah, but we did have Chevron 102 in SoCal. I remember it being like 4 cents more per gallon than Shell in the early 60's, which was a horrible increase when Shell premium was 28 cents a gallon.

...and I think that the old 100 octane would test out very close to 96 R+M/2

edit: at least I thought it was 102 and not 101. anyone remember?

__________________
Mick Batson
1967 original owner Tyro Blue/black top 4-speed HO GTO with all the original parts stored safely away -- 1965 Catalina Safari Wagon.

Last edited by lust4speed; 08-05-2010 at 01:20 AM.
  #37  
Old 08-05-2010, 05:37 PM
Lloyd-TX's Avatar
Lloyd-TX Lloyd-TX is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bellaire (HO-uston), Texas
Posts: 9,012
Default

The old leaded "high-test", "Super", "Supreme", "No-Nox" etc from back in the good ol' days was mostly advertised around here as 100 octane.

Using the current R+M/2 formula, that old high-test would equal approximately 94 or 95 octane.

I recall the Sinclair stations around here had a dial on each pump, one could dial in 100 octane all the way down to ??? (can't recall the regular octane rating back then) in about 10 steps.

__________________
Regards,
"455HO" Lloyd


2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98
  #38  
Old 08-05-2010, 05:41 PM
Lloyd-TX's Avatar
Lloyd-TX Lloyd-TX is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bellaire (HO-uston), Texas
Posts: 9,012
Default

There was a gas price war (remember those?) here in Houston back in the summer of 1972 - not long before the first gas crisis!

All of the stop-and-rob (convenience store) places which sold gas along a section of Westheimer were competing for gas business. 21.9 cents for regular, and 23.9 for 100 octane premium. Being that I had just started driving, and my first car was a '69 GTO - I thought that I had died and gone to heaven, LOL!

This is when I was used to paying 37.9 for Gulf No-Nox.

__________________
Regards,
"455HO" Lloyd


2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98
  #39  
Old 08-05-2010, 09:16 PM
ITSBACK's Avatar
ITSBACK ITSBACK is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NEW JERSEY
Posts: 2,757
Default

E heads win!

  #40  
Old 08-06-2010, 04:25 PM
Lloyd-TX's Avatar
Lloyd-TX Lloyd-TX is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bellaire (HO-uston), Texas
Posts: 9,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ITSBACK View Post
E heads win!
Huh?

__________________
Regards,
"455HO" Lloyd


2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017