Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-17-2011, 11:04 PM
beargfr beargfr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 238
Default 69 GTO: Factory Ram Air Question

Ok, so I've got all the parts and will be installing a factory ram air system on my 69 GTO.

I'm running an SD-455 Qjet on this car, and the carb bowl vent is creating a clearance problem with the lower ram air pan. The way I see it, I've got two likely solutions:
1) Use a 3/4" air cleaner spacer to raise the lower pan enough to clear the vent.
2) "Modify" the lower pan to create clearance for the bowl vent.

Of the two options, I like "1)" the best but what I don't know is how this would affect clearance between the lower pan and the hood pan. Would raising the lower pan 3/4" compress the foam pan seal "too much" or otherwise create a clearance problem between the lower and upper pan?

I'm looking for someone who has a factory ram air already in place on their 69 who might be able to give me a little guidance here.

Thanks,

Bear

  #2  
Old 04-18-2011, 11:26 AM
JKGTO's Avatar
JKGTO JKGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Shelby, Ohio
Posts: 941
Default

You cant raise the bottom ram air pan as the air filter lid will hit the upper ram air pan. Even using a slightly taller air filter can do that. Your either going to have to modify the upper ram air pan or the carb pan. You already had to drill a hole in the carb pan for the vent? Jim

__________________
74 LEMANS GT 350 4SPD MAROON
  #3  
Old 04-18-2011, 12:25 PM
beargfr beargfr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JKGTO View Post
You cant raise the bottom ram air pan as the air filter lid will hit the upper ram air pan. Even using a slightly taller air filter can do that. Your either going to have to modify the upper ram air pan or the carb pan. You already had to drill a hole in the carb pan for the vent? Jim
I haven't done anything to it yet. If I drill the lower pan for the vent then it's going to let in unfiltered air because the hole would be inside the circumference of the filter element. I was wanting to avoid modifying the pan because I didn't want to disturb that nice rounded contour that guides air into the carb, but it looks like that's what I'm going to have to do. I'm going to have to create some sort of dimple or shape on the lower pan that's tall enough to clear the carb vent.
Thanks for the response - it's exactly what I needed to know.

Rob

  #4  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:00 PM
The Boss's Avatar
The Boss The Boss is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 15,451
Default

How about rebuilding a 69 carb to SD specs and run that.

__________________
Some guys they just give up living
And start dying little by little, piece by piece,
Some guys come home from work and wash up,
And go racin' in the street.


Bruce Springsteen - Racing In The Street - 1978
  #5  
Old 04-18-2011, 08:44 PM
Bet Winner's Avatar
Bet Winner Bet Winner is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kernersville, N.C.
Posts: 1,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boss View Post
How about rebuilding a 69 carb to SD specs and run that.
This is what I was going to type until I saw Boss's response so I'll just quote it.

I would not modify a genuine lower pan. I would get a repo to modify.

__________________
My Wife: "I thought I married a sophisticated business man, but what I actually got was a redneck fisherman with muscle cars."

Some people know all of their rights, but none of their obligations.
  #6  
Old 04-18-2011, 09:31 PM
steve v's Avatar
steve v steve v is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,655
Default

Doesn't the 70 RA pan have the vent hole in it already? If so I'd get a repo 70 pan & leave the original one alone.

I've seen guys cut the stack off of the carb vent too. If the SD vent isn't different than a 71 & up Q-jet maybe that's an option.

  #7  
Old 04-18-2011, 10:29 PM
Uncle Judge's Avatar
Uncle Judge Uncle Judge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,080
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve v View Post
Doesn't the 70 RA pan have the vent hole in it already? If so I'd get a repo 70 pan & leave the original one alone.

I've seen guys cut the stack off of the carb vent too. If the SD vent isn't different than a 71 & up Q-jet maybe that's an option.
You are correct Steve. An original or a repro 1970 pan would do the trick for you and will look exactly the same as the 1969 pan until you remove the lid.

The 1970 pan accepts the 1970 California emssions carb which also has the stack like the 71 up carbs have. The 49 state Ram Air lower pans in 1970 got the rubber plug.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017