[Cammer-6]

Originally Posted by Half-Inch Stud

...You're killing me.

show me a specific part # for 69 4 bbl only con rod
it just didnt happen

[694.1]

No doubt about it, the '69 rod was a thing of beauty.
They were serious about strenght but the OHC to the best of my knowlege did not have rod problems.

[Lightfoot]

Without knowing any better, it looks as if the Chevy rod pictured in reply #8 has been heavily machined & resized on the crank end.

[Half-Inch Stud]

Originally Posted by Cammer-6

show me a specific part # for 69 4 bbl only con rod it just didn't happen

Can't because I sold the car. Thus the reason for this Thread.
================================================== ==============
Memorable for 2 reasons; Yes, the 69 rod was a thing of beauty, & it seemed to have more A-shape. Well, when someone can post a photo of a 69 ZH-Block's rod, we'll all know. huh.

[Cammer-6]

if they made it theres a part# for it
even engineering parts have a #.

from the parts book
68-9 T6,F6 9793328
if the 4 bbl had a different rod it would be a different part#

and from the service manuals for 67,68,69

type 1037 or 1038 steel
20.5 oz

perhaps your confusion is the rod bearings for 4 bbl were Morraine 400
and 1 bbl were Morraine 100( lighter duty)