Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:30 PM
dci dci is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,256
Angry DCI MOTORSPORTS RAM AIR 5 Intake

I am having a real tough time with pulling the trigger on this single four intake for my 5 heads. Because I have so many guy's wanting this to fit under the hood.I am going to do it, but the intake in my opinion is going to limit my heads ability to perform. Take a look at the drawings and see what you think. I feel the intake is to flat ,but I cannot go any higher or it will not fit under a stock hood. I really do not like the thought of investing so much money into a turd. If it didn't cost so much, it would not bother me so much.



Don Johnston
DCI MOTORSPORTS INC.
330-850-5050 shop
330-628-3354 cell
Designer of the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 Heads!!!!!!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Newintake.JPG
Views:	355
Size:	42.2 KB
ID:	325631   Click image for larger version

Name:	newintakeside.JPG
Views:	264
Size:	57.5 KB
ID:	325632   Click image for larger version

Name:	newintaketop.JPG
Views:	263
Size:	49.6 KB
ID:	325633  

  #2  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:35 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

If it wont bolt up to a stock set of heads without any work along with a water X over I think your wasting your money!JMHO,Tom

  #3  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:38 PM
quicksilver97ta's Avatar
quicksilver97ta quicksilver97ta is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oak Leaf, Texas
Posts: 1,922
Default

Those guys obviously want the cool factor, that is to say, it's a matter of priorities. Thats cool... Is it the carb or the air cleaner that interferes with the stock hood? Is there not enough clearance to make the intake taller and just mandate the use of a drop base air cleaner?

__________________

68 Firebird, trying a q-jet now. 434/10.5:1/997's/240-242 HFT/4L80E/2800 Yank/3.42's/ Vintage Air/ 13.0 @105 mph
70 Lemans, 350/350, A/C, mostly stock
14 Ram CC, 5.7 Hemi, 8-speed, 3.92 lsd
97 Trans Am, HPP Aug 2012 http://www.highperformancepontiac.co...tiac_trans_am/ ***Sold***
  #4  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:45 PM
dci dci is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,256
Default

To be honest, I'm not really trying to appeal to that market. The factory heads are so hard to come by, and the guy's other than yourself and a hand full of others don't use the heads anyway. It seems like most of the guy's I know that have the heads. Would rather keep them in boxes on the shelf and just use them for conversation sake. I know were there are several sets, but they are not on engines. So I think that if I made it to fit them that I would be wasting my money. Not saying that my intake could not be made to work on factory heads. It's just not my target audience.


Don Johnston
DCI MOTORSPORTS INC.
330-850-5050 shop
330-628-3354 cell
Designer of the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 Heads!!!!!!

  #5  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:48 PM
rad400 rad400 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newark De.
Posts: 1,541
Default

Don it might fit with a good drop in the base or like my dude scoop from Keefer and a frop base.

__________________
Conrad
79 Trans AM 406 #12 heads Torker II intake Crower 60210 750 holley vac. sec. T400 3500 Stall 3:73:1 rear. ECMTTFMFers. IHTTFMFers.
  #6  
Old 06-07-2013, 01:52 PM
dci dci is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,256
Default

quicksilver97ta, I did cheat it up a little higher than a factory quadrajet intake by 3/4", but it is still to low in my opinion. I'm trying to keep it low enough that someone with a Trans Am could still use their shaker scoop. And I think your right, the street guy's are more interested in the cool factor not all out performance.



Don Johnston
DCI MOTORSPORTS INC.
330-850-5050 shop
330-628-3354 cell
Designer of the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 Heads!!!!!!

  #7  
Old 06-07-2013, 02:35 PM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
If it wont bolt up to a stock set of heads without any work along with a water X over I think your wasting your money!JMHO,Tom
I agree. Make it so it will work with OEM heads and fit under the hood and don't worry about it choking the heads. If someone wants to unleash their potential, they'll contact someone like Wilson.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #8  
Old 06-07-2013, 02:45 PM
s2k1 s2k1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ramona CA
Posts: 46
Default

If I were putting these heads on one of my GTOs and wanted to keep everything under the hood, I would build a custom cross ram EFI setup with individual throttle bodies. That's just me.

__________________
1964 GTO Hardtop Black/Black
1964 GTO Sedan Black/Black
1969 Grand Prix Model J
1972 GMC K20 427/TH350
1972 Chevy C30 FlatBed 402/TH400
1972 GMC C10 350/TH350
  #9  
Old 06-07-2013, 02:58 PM
ho428's Avatar
ho428 ho428 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,687
Default

You know me Don, I really want a dual quad... But either way it's got to fit under the hood or people like me won't buy it.
I run a Northwind with a drop base and it fits under a FGF hood even with a 1/4" spacer.
What the NW won't do is fit under a second gen. So you might have to make a car body decision if you want performance height under the hood.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100_4475R.jpg
Views:	171
Size:	75.3 KB
ID:	325656  

  #10  
Old 06-07-2013, 03:03 PM
Sirrotica's Avatar
Sirrotica Sirrotica is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Catawba Ohio
Posts: 7,554
Default

Don, if I spend the money on the redesigned V heads, I would definitely not want them choked by the limiting factor of an intake that has to fit under a stock hood. The factory already made that concession and according to dyno tests the factory V intake really holds the factory iron heads back.

With the raised ports your heads have there is probably only going to be one intake made and I'd like to see it made for utmost performance, not fitting under a stock hood.
Is there any chance the carb base could be made similar to the KRE Northwind that could be milled for clearance at the owners discretion knowing that they will give up some power by doing so.

If your going to make it to fit under a stock hood you might as well make it for a Q-jet base too.................................LOL

__________________
Brad Yost
1973 T/A (SOLD)
2005 GTO
1984 Grand Prix

100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway?

If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated

  #11  
Old 06-07-2013, 03:19 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Don,Lynn's single is very good and pretty much what your going to make!

  #12  
Old 06-07-2013, 06:12 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s2k1 View Post
If I were putting these heads on one of my GTOs and wanted to keep everything under the hood, I would build a custom cross ram EFI setup with individual throttle bodies. That's just me.
That would be my vote too. A LOT of guys are looking into EFI these days and the cross-ram would fit that need (as would a low profile EFI 4-BBL Throttle-Body and a higher intake runner design).

So I would not give up on doing a more developed FUNCTIONAL vs restricted) intake manifold design. Anyone that spends the money to buy your RAV split port heads will have the money for a EFI set-up and still have lots of bragging rights (that it is a RAV type design. You said you are not catering to the stock RAV guys. Cater to the state of the art Pontiac guys who want latest high tech with old school roots.

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #13  
Old 06-07-2013, 06:34 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,992
Default

Up until Tom's post, I had not really considered EFI. But why not? Lots of advantages there for a street car and the lousy high vapor pressure pump gas. A cross ram EFI would be really cool. For my personal use, keeping it all under a stock hood is a must. I wouldn't cut up my original muscle car with a hood scoop. I like the appeal of stock looking and a killer engine hidden under the hood. As said, the manifold needs to work too. A tough situation with tall heads and low hoods.

  #14  
Old 06-07-2013, 06:35 PM
RAIV-Z's Avatar
RAIV-Z RAIV-Z is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NH
Posts: 1,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
Don,Lynn's single is very good and pretty much what your going to make!
Will McCarty's intake fit your heads and stock V heads without major modification and will it make reasonable power?

In my opinion, your target market for aftermarket RA-V heads fitting under a stock hood is going to be extremely limited.

You should not compromise your intake design to fit under a stock hood. If it fits McCarty's heads, and is EFI ready, I'll take 1.

Do you need an intake to test fit with your heads?
How close are your exhaust ports/header bolt locations to McCartys V heads?

__________________


2023 Best ET Slip
60’ 1.224
330 3.186
1/8 4.784
MPH 152.07
1000 6.175
ET 7.347
MPH 189.92
Weight 3650

YouTube Channel --> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC21...rWwgFdfTRqShGQ

FaceBook Group --> https://www.facebook.com/groups/220092308823847/
  #15  
Old 06-07-2013, 07:32 PM
s2k1 s2k1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ramona CA
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
That would be my vote too. A LOT of guys are looking into EFI these days and the cross-ram would fit that need (as would a low profile EFI 4-BBL Throttle-Body and a higher intake runner design).

So I would not give up on doing a more developed FUNCTIONAL vs restricted) intake manifold design. Anyone that spends the money to buy your RAV split port heads will have the money for a EFI set-up and still have lots of bragging rights (that it is a RAV type design. You said you are not catering to the stock RAV guys. Cater to the state of the art Pontiac guys who want latest high tech with old school roots.

Tom Vaught
Sorry for the Hi-jack Don!
On subject, I too think you should make the intake for optimum performance, and not worry about the hood height.

As for the cross ram, how about something like one of these?


__________________
1964 GTO Hardtop Black/Black
1964 GTO Sedan Black/Black
1969 Grand Prix Model J
1972 GMC K20 427/TH350
1972 Chevy C30 FlatBed 402/TH400
1972 GMC C10 350/TH350
  #16  
Old 06-07-2013, 07:57 PM
67copperbird 67copperbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Greenwood Indiana
Posts: 140
Default

I will play the devil's advocate and say "make a short deck block" then you could have a taller intake. Problem solved.

__________________
Ben Mowery
  #17  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:08 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

a custom converted ford tunnel port single 4 made 30 HP over a stock intake!It was the same height as the stock intake.That was with just a intake change with same carb and no tuning.It is worth the change IMO.Tom

  #18  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:09 PM
67copperbird 67copperbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Greenwood Indiana
Posts: 140
Default

Don I personally think that folks who want a tall single plane or dual fours would spring for a custom intake. For my application I will need something that fits under the hood. If that means having an intake made than that's what it means. I would let the folks who buy them drive your market.

__________________
Ben Mowery
  #19  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:36 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

The 2nd picture posted by s2k1 would be fairly easy to cast up as it is actually 2 runners systems. Do the work properly and would could use one mold for both sides if you got the stagger right.

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #20  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:54 PM
Doug Hopkins's Avatar
Doug Hopkins Doug Hopkins is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Sebring, Florida USA
Posts: 833
Default

If I were spending the the money to put a RamAirV in my Firebird or GTO I would not worry about the hood clearance. I would want the best intake manifold you could make. I would make the adjustment with a cowl induction style hood. The RAV is not original to the car, so why worry about using an original hood. Just my 2cents.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017