Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #621  
Old 08-12-2014, 09:40 AM
dci dci is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,256
Default

The DCI Tiger heads are definitely bad a$$$ for an inline valve platform. I cannot wait to get my new DCI 5 heads on an engine to see if it's possible to raise the bar again. My new heads will definitely help distribute the heat more evenly over the head and should hold head gaskets much better. That by itself is a huge plus!!!!


Don Johnston
DCI MOTORSPORTS INC.
330-850-5050 shop
330-628-3354 cell
Designer of the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 heads !!!!!!

  #622  
Old 08-12-2014, 10:06 AM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Myers, Fl.
Posts: 9,715
Default

What's the availability on cam companies being able to supply RA5 cams?

  #623  
Old 08-12-2014, 10:34 AM
dci dci is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,256
Default

There are several cam companies that can and will make cams, but I am working with LSM.



Don Johnston
DCI MOTORSPORTS INC.
330-850-5050 shop
330-628-3354 cell
Designer of the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 heads !!!!!!

  #624  
Old 08-12-2014, 10:41 AM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Have been getting cams from comp for years.Tom

  #625  
Old 08-13-2014, 12:01 PM
dci dci is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,256
Default

Tom I have used Comp as well, but I like LSM's lobe selection better. Unfortunately Pontiac's have a small cam core and it's really hard to get a decent lobe on them. LSM seems to have a pretty good handle on it though.



Don Johnston
DCI MOTORSPORTS INC.
330-850-5050 shop
330-628-3354 cell
Designer of the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 heads !!!!!!

  #626  
Old 08-13-2014, 12:24 PM
RAMAIR RICK RAMAIR RICK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 130
Default

Remember for the aftermarket crowd, me being one of them, I am going with a 55mm cam blank, which will open up the possibilities for everyone going down that path.

  #627  
Old 08-13-2014, 06:07 PM
RAIV-Z's Avatar
RAIV-Z RAIV-Z is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NH
Posts: 1,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAMAIR RICK View Post
Remember for the aftermarket crowd, me being one of them, I am going with a 55mm cam blank, which will open up the possibilities for everyone going down that path.
Hey Rick,

Standard firing order, 4-7 swap or LS1?

__________________


2023 Best ET Slip
60’ 1.224
330 3.186
1/8 4.784
MPH 152.07
1000 6.175
ET 7.347
MPH 189.92
Weight 3650

YouTube Channel --> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC21...rWwgFdfTRqShGQ

FaceBook Group --> https://www.facebook.com/groups/220092308823847/
  #628  
Old 08-13-2014, 06:31 PM
RAMAIR RICK RAMAIR RICK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 130
Default

RAIV-Z, I do not know for sure if it is going to be the 4-7 swap, or the LS1, are they the same? I will Let Chris Uratchko make that determination. Whichever one is the best for my application. I will be surprised if it ends up be the stock Pontiac firing order. If Chris is looking around PY, maybe he could respond to that question.

  #629  
Old 08-13-2014, 08:12 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

LS and late Ford 302/351 are the same and the cam would require a double swap.

1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3. vs the stock Pontiac:
1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2

Easiest way to visualize it is shown above. Let Chris decide.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #630  
Old 08-14-2014, 05:39 AM
RAMAIR RICK RAMAIR RICK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 130
Default

Tom Thanks for your knowledgeable information. For the Pontiac people here, would you from an engineering perspective, tell the reasons/advantages of having a LS/FORD firing order as well as the 4-7 swap? This much I do know, the Fords and LS engines do has a nasty/anger sound to them. I wonder if that is a result of the firing order or head port design. I am wondering how the New DCI - RamAir V will sound????

  #631  
Old 08-14-2014, 10:04 AM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Would changing the firing order affect the way custom headers are clocked?Tom

  #632  
Old 08-15-2014, 09:37 PM
grandville455's Avatar
grandville455 grandville455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chippewa Falls,WI 54729
Posts: 10,862
Default

Don,
I have some more questions, Are there going to be drain back holes in the heads? Will there have to be a special stud girdle for them? You can run water thru them right? Factory crossovers work or is that a special item too if needed? Will anything need to be done to the bottom end to beef it up, lifter bore bracing? or is 6-6500 going to be a good shift point? AS for the exhaust, will the headers stay the same height from the ground now as a reg D Port like my KRE heads, I have limited ground clearance now(maybe 2")for driving on the street,lol

__________________
Darby
74 Grandville 2Dr 455 c.i 4550#
2011 1.60 60 ft,[email protected]@117.74


2017, 74 firebird -3600 lbs (all bests) 1.33 60 ft, [email protected] [email protected]
M/T 275/60 ET SS Drag Radial

2024(Pontiac 505) 1.25 60 ft, [email protected], [email protected].... 275/60 Radial Pro's

Last edited by grandville455; 08-15-2014 at 09:57 PM.
  #633  
Old 08-15-2014, 10:31 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
Would changing the firing order affect the way custom headers are clocked?Tom
In one word, Yes.

Say you had a clockwise pattern on the passenger side collector with a 10:00, 2:00, 4:00, & 8:00 clock pattern.

Stock Pontiac firing order clocking would be: (Assuming the pattern started at 2:00)
Cylinder #2 would be at 2:00
Cylinder #8 would be at 4:00
Cylinder #4 would be at 8:00
Cylinder #6 would be at 10:00


Say you had a COUNTER clockwise pattern on the drivers side collector with a 10:00, 2:00, 4:00, & 8:00 pattern.

Stock Pontiac firing order clocking would be: (Assuming the pattern started at 10:00)
Cylinder #1 would be at 10:00
Cylinder #3 would be at 8:00
Cylinder #5 would be at 4:00
Cylinder #7 would be at 2:00


Again you had a clockwise pattern on the passenger side collector with a 10:00, 2:00, 4:00, & 8:00 clock pattern.

Ford/LS firing order clocking would be: (Assuming the pattern started at 2:00)
Cylinder #8 would be at 2:00
Cylinder #2 would be at 4:00
Cylinder #6 would be at 8:00
Cylinder #4 would be at 10:00


Again you had a COUNTER clockwise pattern on the drivers side collector with a 10:00, 2:00, 4:00, & 8:00 pattern.

Ford/LS firing order clocking would be: (Assuming the pattern started at 10:00)
Cylinder #1 would be at 10:00
Cylinder #7 would be at 8:00
Cylinder #5 would be at 4:00
Cylinder #3 would be at 2:00

Tom Vaught

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #634  
Old 08-15-2014, 11:12 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Thanks Tom,I knew the answer and wated to throw it out there for people interested.Tom

  #635  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:56 AM
estep455's Avatar
estep455 estep455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: benton illinois
Posts: 1,030
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
In one word, Yes.

Say you had a clockwise pattern on the passenger side collector with a 10:00, 2:00, 4:00, & 8:00 clock pattern.

Stock Pontiac firing order clocking would be: (Assuming the pattern started at 2:00)
Cylinder #2 would be at 2:00
Cylinder #8 would be at 4:00
Cylinder #4 would be at 8:00
Cylinder #6 would be at 10:00


Say you had a COUNTER clockwise pattern on the drivers side collector with a 10:00, 2:00, 4:00, & 8:00 pattern.

Stock Pontiac firing order clocking would be: (Assuming the pattern started at 10:00)
Cylinder #1 would be at 10:00
Cylinder #3 would be at 8:00
Cylinder #5 would be at 4:00
Cylinder #7 would be at 2:00


Again you had a clockwise pattern on the passenger side collector with a 10:00, 2:00, 4:00, & 8:00 clock pattern.

Ford/LS firing order clocking would be: (Assuming the pattern started at 2:00)
Cylinder #8 would be at 2:00
Cylinder #2 would be at 4:00
Cylinder #6 would be at 8:00
Cylinder #4 would be at 10:00


Again you had a COUNTER clockwise pattern on the drivers side collector with a 10:00, 2:00, 4:00, & 8:00 pattern.

Ford/LS firing order clocking would be: (Assuming the pattern started at 10:00)
Cylinder #1 would be at 10:00
Cylinder #7 would be at 8:00
Cylinder #5 would be at 4:00
Cylinder #3 would be at 2:00

Tom Vaught
good info thanks tom

  #636  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:15 PM
RAMAIR RICK RAMAIR RICK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 130
Default

Thanks Tom for sharing your engineering wisdom. With all of the different firing order options out there today, from an engine dynamics/performance standpoint, is there one firing order that is better then all the other V8's??? and if so is it worth going after??? Say the Ford/LS engine firing order or the 4/7 swap. Thanks in advance

  #637  
Old 08-17-2014, 11:19 PM
BruceWilkie BruceWilkie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 9,132
Default

There was an article a few years back in iirc a Hot Rod Engines edition... the way it read to me was 4/7 swaps sometimes help add a bit of higher rpm power with no trade off at lower rpm. Manifold design might impact whether you gain or not. The double swap(351W/LS) wasnt tested in that article. However they did mention GM's decision to use it was better load distribution on the mains(less load on #2). Perhaps that was Ford's reason to use it on 351W and then later on the 5.0. Better load balance can help improve harmonics which could maybe allow more rpm and possibly more power through less load on bearings.

I plan to use the LS/351W order on my build.

I'll dig the article out and scan it if no one has an internet link to it.

  #638  
Old 08-19-2014, 11:59 AM
dci dci is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,256
Default

There are oil drain back holes in the heads .500" inside diameter on each end like the factory heads. I have not considered a stud girdle, but I am working with Harland Sharp who are making shaft mount rockers. They will have 1.5 to 2.0-1 ratios available. I designed the head for Harland Sharp 1.65 roller rockers as a direct bolt on with guide plates. As for the water crossover, you can definitely use one cut off of a factory intake or the KRE crossover.I kept the factory location so the factory water crossovers will work. I am anticipating a conservative rpm range for the street version of my heads at or around 6,000-6,500. So I don't think that the bottom end will need much mare than usual for that application. I also think that the alternate firing orders will help with crank and block stress as well. I am actually building the header prototypes. So I am very aware of ground clearance and will do my best to keep the headers tight without rattling.



Don Johnston
DCI MOTORSPORTS INC.
330-850-5050 shop
330-628-3354 cell
Designer of the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 heads !!!!!!

  #639  
Old 08-19-2014, 02:12 PM
Bob with the 66's Avatar
Bob with the 66 Bob with the 66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Motor city outsider, MI
Posts: 1,150
Default

Go Don Go!

Hopefully you will design a set of headers for a 66 GTO ;-)

I'm really looking forward to hearing some output numbers on engines running your heads.

Thank's for keeping this going.......
Bob,

__________________
"Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity".

1966 GTO Post Coupe, 467ci. N/A Pump gas, best 1/4 11.6 118mph
1966 GTO Post Coupe, "The Bright Idea" 535ci. N/A Pump gas, best 1/4 9.56 139mph
  #640  
Old 08-19-2014, 03:35 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAMAIR RICK View Post
Thanks Tom for sharing your engineering wisdom. With all of the different firing order options out there today, from an engine dynamics/performance standpoint, is there one firing order that is better then all the other V8's??? and if so is it worth going after??? Say the Ford/LS engine firing order or the 4/7 swap. Thanks in advance
The ORIGINAL FORD "late" 302 and 351W used the Firing order known as the LS firing order (for the GM guys). Ford went with this firing order because it eliminated the "Double Hit" on the #1 and #2 Main caps with The right front cylinder firing and then the left front cylinder firing. By doing this the block and crank saw a lot less stress vs using the GM firing order.

On a Factory Pontiac block, in my mind well worth the effort.

With a All Pontiac Block that has had the front bulkhead strengthened over the years and steel main caps on all 5 positions, maybe not such a big deal on the block but the crank still sees the hit on two crank journals for the 6 then 5 and 4 then 3 with the LS firing order and 4 then 3 and 6 then 5 with the Pontiac firing order.

So to repeat again, the benefit is on the front main and the second main that see all of the normal stress in a normal pontiac.

I have inspected Factory 455 4-Bolt main blocks with cast caps where the #2 main was broken completely around the inner bolts, the thrust cap was broken 3/4 of the way from the block surface moving toward the windage tray, and 1/2 broken on the #3 cap, again the crack started at the block surface and was moving toward the windage tray.

So the #2 main cap sees a lot of stress with the factory Pontiac firing order.

If you have a supercharger belt applying force on the crank snout it is even worse.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017