| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#461
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ |
|
#462
|
||||
|
||||
|
All settled in and dry at the Velocity Lounge. No bloody Mary's till 10am!
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ |
|
#463
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#464
|
||||
|
||||
|
They know how to set up a Bloody Mary bar that's for sure.
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ |
|
#465
|
||||
|
||||
|
It took 10 minutes to get thru the line that had formed at the bar since 7am, LOL
Worth the wait!
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ |
|
#466
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ |
|
#467
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cowboy cheerleaders. Things are warming up.
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ |
|
#468
|
||||
|
||||
|
Diffey, Hobbs & Matchett look silly on their outdoor podium reporting the Pre-race info. Would think producers could've moved them indoors.
Nice to see race will be held today...albeit w shortened Quali this morning. Nico another pole w Hamilton knocking on the door of securing his 3rd world title...perhaps today? Should be an interesting race to say the least.
|
|
#469
|
||||
|
||||
|
Final preps
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ |
|
#470
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well at least Rossi had a nice livery on his car.
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ |
|
#471
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow! What a race!
|
|
#472
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was indeed!
A celebration is in order.
__________________
http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ Last edited by 165th; 10-25-2015 at 06:41 PM. |
|
#473
|
||||
|
||||
Already a week has passed and time for Mexico City F1 Grand Prix race...practice today, w Quali Saturday, and Sunday's race is scheduled to be televised on local NBC stations. |
|
#474
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nico has rear brake fire and failure of both rear wheels during yesterday's practice in Mexico...NBCSportsNet showed "handful of carbon fibre rotor shreds" from the same MERC brake failure.
|
|
#475
|
||||
|
||||
|
2015 Brazil GP: Manor Formula One F1 Race Preview
PaddockTalk · 15 hours ago http://paddocktalk.com/news/html/story-293404.html All you need to know about Round 18 of the FIA Formula 1 World Championship > Race dates 13-15 November…Location Autódromo José … Quote:
|
|
#476
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#477
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mayor: F1 Can't Look to Austin for US Grand Prix Bailout
![]() http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireSto...ilout-35180639 "The mayor of Austin says Formula One officials can't look to the Texas capital for a bailout of the financially struggling United States Grand Prix. Mayor Steve Adler said Friday the state of Texas should stand by its previous agreement with the Circuit of the Americas. Track officials say that deal includes a promise of at least $25 million per year from the Major Events Trust Fund. But Gov. Greg Abbott's office this week said it is trimming about $6 million in annual funding. Circuit officials and Formula One boss Bernie Ecclestone say that could threaten the future of the Austin race after just four years. The U.S. Grand Prix still gets about $19.5 million from the fund and nearly $23 million total in public money." |
|
#478
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2015/...state-funding/
F1: USGP threatened by cut in Texas state funding By Adam Cooper Published November 11, 2015 FoxSports The future of the USGP has been thrown into doubt by the news that the Texas state government has dramatically reduced the subsidy it pays to the Circuit of The Americas, and which in effect goes some way to covering F1's sanction fee. Originally the state had made a $250M commitment over 10 years, and the race received $25M per year in 2012, 2013, and 2014, but this has been cut to $19.5M for this year. The circuit was made aware of this number before the race weekend, although the news has only just emerged. ADVERTISEMENT It comes on top of the losses caused by the bad weather at this year's event, which led to reduced sales of concessions and also had an impact on the event's viability. “To use a technical term, I think we’re screwed,” circuit chairman Bobby Epstein told the American-Statesman. “It hit us cold. No one could foresee this coming. But the big question now is, ‘Is the race coming back?’” Meanwhile Bernie Ecclestone told the paper: “If it’s changed, it’s going to be difficult to continue the race in Austin.” The whole COTA project was built around the idea that the race qualified for a subsidy that is paid to major events to reflect the income that they generate for the cities that host them. This is in effect based on how much tax revenue out-of-state visitors generate during their stay. The Texas Major Events Trust Fund was approved by previous state governor Rick Perry and administered by the office of Comptroller Susan Combs, who worked closely with event founder Tavo Hellmund, and Ecclestone when CoTA was first planned. However, on Sept. 1 responsibility was transferred to the office of current Governor Greg Abbott, who took over from Perry in January this year. Following an audit by Texas State Auditor John Keel, Abbott's staff have used a different formula and concluded that the event is worth around 20 percent less to the state than previous figures suggested. In his report Keel noted: “Although the Comptroller's Office prepares post-event studies after a major event, those studies cannot accurately determine whether the estimated incremental tax receipt increases were actually collected. “Specifically, those studies state that determining the measurable change in tax receipts due to a major event is difficult due to the size and population of the state. In addition, taxes are remitted to the State based on receipts from 30-day to 90-day periods, which makes it difficult to isolate the economic effect of a particular major event.” He also made it clear that in the past some tax types had incorrectly been included in the calculations: “The Comptroller's Office inappropriately implemented that methodology by including certain information in its calculations that is not permissible. Specifically, when the Comptroller's Office used economic modeling software to estimate the incremental tax receipt increases associated with major events, its estimates included tax impacts for tax types that statute does not permit to be considered. “Based on output from a demonstration that the Comptroller's Office's staff performed using the estimated direct spending amounts for an actual major event, auditors determined that 22 percent of the total funding that would have been approved for that major event was caused by the inclusion of tax types that were not permissible.” |
|
#479
|
|||
|
|||
|
A great race in Texas!!
Well it was a pretty good run.......never thought it would be so quick! I have a feeling that a big Corp will jump in as a major backer for the race to continue. |
|
#480
|
||||
|
||||
|
F1’s Engine Changes Spur Debate and Litigation for 2016 and Beyond
F1’s big four have agreed to lower the cost of their engines to struggling teams. Anyone not living under a rock for the past three years has heard people condemn and attack the current lineup of Formula One power plans. Though there have been several improvements for 2016 announced, the world is still waiting with bated breath for these changes which ought to improve the spectacle significantly. With promises for more aggressive engine noise and improved distribution to the smaller teams, the hope is that Formula One will become more engaging and competitive with midfielders whose chances for a podium were limited by soaring engine prices. There still exists an argument between some of the engine manufacturers and big wigs like F1 magnet Ecclestone, who at times insist that F1 ought to return to atmospheric V8s for greater appeal. Of course, a high-winding V8 might have the sonic advantage over the somewhat-muted V6, but short of changing the engine formula, there may be a solution to make the turbocharged V6 more exciting. 2016 Changes To address the aural side of things, a recent change announced the implementation of a separated wastegate-to-exhaust tailpipe. Calling for a separate exhaust for the wastegate also does away with the silencing effect of last year’s system, which dumped the wastegate gasses into the main exhaust. Though losing a certain amount of efficiency, a vocalized wastegate and a divorced exhaust system will generate an exhaust note up to 25% louder. However, part of the turbocharged engine’s appeal isn’t just the volume, but the induction’s audio. Formula Spy wrote this article discussing the signature popping, whistling and cracking. Hopefully, this change will add a little more texture to the dull and muted tones. When power is concerned, the whole business becomes trickier and much more complicated. Subject to stringent rules regarding fuel burn rate and reliability, the modern engines cannot be asked to make more power simply by means of increasing boost given the current fuel flow rate. Of course, nowadays, the engine is only one component of the “power unit,” so the efficiency of the MGU-H, as well as the frictional losses of the motor and the ancillaries are the only avenues to more thrust. For those of you not in the know or familiar with F1, the MGU-H is the ‘Motor Generator Unit – Heat’. It essentially captures waste heat from the turbocharger through an electric generator, which is then stored. The 1986 Benetton made over 1,100 horsepower on qualifying boost. Don’t expect those sorts of numbers anytime soon. Engine Availability Perhaps the most prevalent issue on the other side of the fence is the availability of engines to the lesser teams. Mercedes and Ferrari have created a division between themselves and the rest of the field thanks to their resources and thus, their ability to refine the motors within a set of exacting rules. In addition, Renault and Honda, though troubled with problems of their own, have limited production numbers, thus making securing an engine a big task for teams like Marussia. To address this problem, FIA President Jean Todt announced that midfield teams will be able to secure engines from the sport’s four manufacturers for a more reasonable cost, thereby negating the need for an additional supplier. Reuters reported that currently, the four big manufacturers are banding together to see a reduction in engine costs, which should hopefully level the playing field somewhat. In return for lowered engine costs, it has been reported by BBC that F1’s current engine formula will remain until 2020. The affable Daniel Ricciardo is not the only driver who has voiced their complaints about the current engine formula. As ever with Formula One, the politics and big business involved make it tough getting these rules to take effect directly or quickly, but we should see in the coming months what effect, if any, this litigation will have on the level of competition. One thing’s for certain: if the exhaust changes are made and the cars become more reliant on mechanical grip as they’re predicted to, we may see a very exciting year with plenty of overtaking and a few more fans plugging their ears as the cars fly by. Edit: Check out this interesting comment below Quote:
|
| Reply |
|
|