Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-20-2017, 06:58 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default Stump puller II 455

About 5 years ago I built a pretty stock 455 pump gas engine for my Judge.455,9.5C,completely stock 48 heads except springs and 1 pc valves.I used a XE276HR on a 110 as I had it in my drawer.We ran a stock AL SD intake with Joe Shermans dyno carb and custom 2in Tyree 4 tube headers.The engine made 432 HP at 5200.That cam was [email protected] ran 1.65 H&S rockers.I put Daves new Stump Puller II in the engine with exact same intake and carb put replaced the 1.65s with 1.50s to keep the lift virtually the same.Because I wanted to know the performance as it will be in the car I used long branch 2 1/4 exhaust to about 2 ft of 2 1/2 pipe into Joes dyno mufflers.The engine made virtually the same HP 234 but at 5400.Joe figures we gave up about 15-20 HP with exhaust from the 4 tubes.We also ran no spacers as I cant run one with the 69 T/A RA pans.This cam was on a 112 put in at 107.He is going to pump it.FWIW,Tom

  #2  
Old 04-20-2017, 07:32 PM
pastry_chef's Avatar
pastry_chef pastry_chef is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,300
Default

Excellent information, thanks

Curious about the numbers lower down for both.

  #3  
Old 04-20-2017, 07:37 PM
PAUL K's Avatar
PAUL K PAUL K is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sugar Grove IL USA
Posts: 7,441
Default

Great information....thanks for sharing.

__________________
Go fast, see Elvis!
www.facebook.com/PaulKnippensMuscleMotors
  #4  
Old 04-20-2017, 07:38 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

He starts the pulls about 3800,peak TQ was right there on both.The SP2 was 500.I will get the sheets on this engine when hes done.Tom

  #5  
Old 04-20-2017, 07:59 PM
71 T/A 71 T/A is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,378
Default

Tom, you're saying the Stump Puller 2 was no better than the XE276 HR? I have the Stump Puller 1 in my 72 Formula and that cam is great, like the idle and power, especially with ram air manifolds.

  #6  
Old 04-20-2017, 08:07 PM
72LuxuryLeMansLa.'s Avatar
72LuxuryLeMansLa. 72LuxuryLeMansLa. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eunice, La.
Posts: 3,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71 T/A View Post
Tom, you're saying the Stump Puller 2 was no better than the XE276 HR? I have the Stump Puller 1 in my 72 Formula and that cam is great, like the idle and power, especially with ram air manifolds.
Just a guess on my part but, with stock-non-ported d-ports there is a point where more cam wont net much result.....?

__________________
Karl

  #7  
Old 04-20-2017, 09:09 PM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 5,871
Default

Not apples to apples but food for thought: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...8&postcount=63


Btw, what timing made peak hp?

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird, 400/461, 290 Eddy D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, XS 350, #47 heads, TH400, 10 Bolt 3.23 gears, work in progress
‘66 Lemans, 455, 310 KRE D-Ports, HR 236/245, TH400, GV OD, 12 bolt 3.73 gears - see it here:
https://youtu.be/RP_s1wJKm_Y?si=K0NZxoTyaGcj8Dcb
  #8  
Old 04-20-2017, 09:14 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

As I said,Joe thought at least 15HP because of the small exhaust,It made HP 200 RPMs over the smaller cam.Only 6 degrees more.Tom

  #9  
Old 04-20-2017, 09:59 PM
Will Will is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 5,297
Default

If I read tom's original post correctly, the engine with the SP2 *and* a more restrictive exhaust made the same power as the XE276 with headers.

The consensus was the engine would've made 15-20 more HP with the SP2 and the same headers/exhaust.

Did I get that right?

__________________
----------------------------
'72 Formula 400 Lucerne Blue, Blue Deluxe interior - My first car!
'73 Firebird 350/4-speed Black on Black, mix & match.
  #10  
Old 04-21-2017, 05:02 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,153
Default

Too many changes to really make a comparison between the camshafts. The change in rocker arms was a BIG deal as it made the smaller cam very close to the bigger one with additional effective duration and added lift.

Below are a couple of dyno runs from a 455 with #96 heads and 9.3 to 1 compression. Even though they are ported to 250cfm, note that the same 276HR cam didn't make power high enough in the rpm range to really need that much flow, but the bigger cam really took advantage of it.

The cam was the only change made there as well.....Cliff
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0223.jpg
Views:	1231
Size:	57.1 KB
ID:	452598  

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #11  
Old 04-21-2017, 07:09 AM
AdamIsAdam's Avatar
AdamIsAdam AdamIsAdam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff R View Post
Too many changes to really make a comparison between the camshafts. The change in rocker arms was a BIG deal as it made the smaller cam very close to the bigger one with additional effective duration and added lift.

Below are a couple of dyno runs from a 455 with #96 heads and 9.3 to 1 compression. Even though they are ported to 250cfm, note that the same 276HR cam didn't make power high enough in the rpm range to really need that much flow, but the bigger cam really took advantage of it.

The cam was the only change made there as well.....Cliff
wow!

Cliff, what rocker size was this engine using, do you recall?

I would have expected more torque, no?

__________________
Adam
__________________
1964 LeGTO
469, M21, 3.42
__________________
Sold:
1968 Pontiac LeMans Convertible
See it go HERE
  #12  
Old 04-21-2017, 08:40 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,532
Default

If this dyno test was done with the same Carb jetting then also take note of the smaller BSFC numbers with the second Cam and its greater power with less fuel!

The fuel went into making greater power and not out the Exh!

  #13  
Old 04-21-2017, 10:44 AM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

This engine is going in a 69 firebird for a track car.I put the bigger cam in in hopes to raise to HP curves to maybe kill off some of the low end to help blowing off the tires coming out of a corner.As said I wanted this engine on the dyno exactly like it will be in the car on the track.If everything looks good Joe is going to put on a HSD single plain to see if it has a effect either way.Again it is bone stock,not port matched.The engine is not ideal but did not want to chance hurting my 366 NASCAR RA V engine in the car so this was sitting in the garage doing nothing.I just swapped the cam and put a Canton pan on it.If looking for more HP I would have changed the springs to reuse the 1.65 rockers and maybe even the next step cam.Tom

  #14  
Old 04-21-2017, 02:51 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,711
Default

Tom how did the Canton pan go on?

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected]
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed
  #15  
Old 04-21-2017, 03:56 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

No issue,I put tape in the inside and ran the dip stick against it,drilled the hole there and it works perfectly.Tom

  #16  
Old 04-21-2017, 05:12 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Little more info,the engine was not able to use the single plane HCD intake.HP was a few less and at a couple hundred turns less?The other thing we found is it pumps 190-195 and I question if I can run our 91 gas.Going to get ahold of Dave and get his feel.He told me to put it in at 107 and now I question if that might be a little too much.Also on one pull he had a high RPM pop that I think is because of the cheap ass plug wires I gave him.He is going to put a set of 8MMs on and do some pulls over the weekend.Wont have any sheets untill he gets it off the pump.For those interested I will post up.Tom

  #17  
Old 04-24-2017, 12:56 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Dave suggest to back it up a coule degrees.Going to have Joe do it while it is on the pump and he has time.Tom

  #18  
Old 04-25-2017, 10:15 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Joe backed it up some,the engine liked it,now at 449 HP.Going to his place and get details and dyno sheets.Forgot to ask if it lowered the pumping compression.Hope to get it off the pump tomorrow.More HP than I need for the bird on the road track.Tom

  #19  
Old 04-26-2017, 08:36 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,932
Default

Pumping 190-195 I've found very tough to run on pump gas. Had a couple of engines back East where I had easy access to 94 pump gas and these engines were still VERY sensitive with a conservative tune and cool temps.

Out here on our crappy 91?? No way. Hopefully retarding the cam a bit knocks that pumping number down enough for you to run this 91 cat pea we have.

  #20  
Old 04-26-2017, 10:10 AM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Looks like it now pumps under 190 in all cyc.Dave said the cam was designed for highly ported heads.Tom

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017