67-69 Firebird TECH Includes 69 TA.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-16-2018, 11:43 AM
Stripes's Avatar
Stripes Stripes is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 384
Default 8.2" rear end defects and fixes? 1969 FB

I have an 8.2" rear factory posi OE rear end with 3:55 gears in my 1969 FB. I am planning on increasing the power output to 550-600 torque. I hear my rear end may not live with that level of power. I would like to know before I oil a track.

Would welding the tubes into the center full circle, and replacing the ring carrier with an Eaton unit resolve the failing rear end issues? Or is there something fundamentally weak about there rear ends that can not be corrected? Axles?

I realize the 8.5" is a stronger rear end and can substitute in, as a will a 12 bolt. I would like to keep the original rear end in there and just possibly upgrade the weak pieces....unless they are all weak. I'm not sure what typically fails on these?

Is anyone running 600 foot pounds of tq or more thru an 8.2 with drag radials and having it live? This is a street car with some visits to the track.
Thanks in advance.

  #2  
Old 01-16-2018, 01:04 PM
Stripes's Avatar
Stripes Stripes is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 384
Default

Oh, and this is a Nodular rear end, denoted by the big N cast into it. I am unsure when they refer to "grey iron" rear ends if this includes nodular rear ends.

  #3  
Old 01-16-2018, 08:14 PM
First Bird's Avatar
First Bird First Bird is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 547
Default

I haven't tried to beef up an 8.2. I just heard from enough knowledgable people to not bother with it. I beefed up a 1972 Nova 8.5. It's holding up well behind an aluminum headed 455, without drag radials.

__________________
- Tom
  #4  
Old 01-16-2018, 08:53 PM
RAJ7395's Avatar
RAJ7395 RAJ7395 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Peoria, Illinois USA
Posts: 1,669
Default

Contact PY member 'Ol Pinion Head. He's an excellent resource for information on Pontiac differentials. Strengths, weaknesses, etc.

__________________
1969 TA RAIII M40 Auto Cameo White/ Std Blue Int
1970 TA RAIII M21 4-spd Lucy Blue/Std Black Int
1971 TA 455 HO M22 4-Spd Lucy Blue/Deluxe White Int
  #5  
Old 01-17-2018, 07:50 AM
AG's Avatar
AG AG is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,262
Default

If it is the original rear I would take it out and replace it with an 8.5". I have broken a Pontiac 8.2" on the strip before.

__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
  #6  
Old 01-17-2018, 01:04 PM
Stripes's Avatar
Stripes Stripes is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 384
Default Gray Iron or Nodular

Quote:
Originally Posted by AG View Post
If it is the original rear I would take it out and replace it with an 8.5". I have broken a Pontiac 8.2" on the strip before.
I see the gray Iron 8.2 break at the pinion support area and axles and positraction carriers don't improve that issue.

I have learned I have the 4 pinion HD Nodular rear end in my 1969, likely with forged axles.

Has anyone broken or had any experience with the Nodular rear ends breaking? They are pretty rare compared to a standard 8.2" rear I believe.

  #7  
Old 01-18-2018, 11:28 AM
AG's Avatar
AG AG is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,262
Default

Because of it's rarity I would not use it, it would be difficult finding another one. The weak point in your rear is the 8.2" diameter ring gear, the N housing and posi are fairly strong. Try to find an 8.5" and upgrade the posi and axles for your power level.

__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
  #8  
Old 01-22-2018, 03:19 PM
north's Avatar
north north is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,424
Default

The "N" nodular rear ends didn't as a rule include forged axles. The exception is the higher numerical ratio units used on 69 HO GP's but they were only produced in handfuls.

__________________
My Break Away Squad
1969 Fbird (Base, 350, 400HO & Sprint Cvt’s - 400HO & TA Hardtops)
1969 LeMans (2dr & 4dr Hardtop and a Cvt)
1969 LeMans Safari 2 seat Wagon
1969 GTO (2 Cvt, 2 Hardtops & Judge Hardtop)
1969 Catalina (3 Cvt’s & a 2dr hardtop)
1969 Ventura 2 Seat Wagon
1969 Executive 4dr Sedan
1969 Bonnie Cvt
1969 Bonnie 3 Seat Wagon (2 of them)
1969 Bonnie Brougham (4dr Hardtop & Cvt)
1969 Grand Prix SJ (2 of them)
1969 2+2 2dr Hardtop (Canadian model)
  #9  
Old 01-28-2018, 05:07 AM
Squidward's Avatar
Squidward Squidward is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 4,383
Default

I also went with a Nova 8.5 rear end. It was a pretty easy swap, and building the guts is significantly less expensive than sourcing the limited amount of available 8.2 BOP parts. 8.5 stuff is sooooo much more available.

I agree with AG. I kept my 3.23 BOP rear for my FB parked away for later. If I frag the rear end at the track, at least I will have something to fall back on once my "speed bug" subsides.

__________________
"...ridge reamer and ring compressor? Do they have tools like that?"
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017