Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-08-2019, 01:16 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default EQUAL VS UNEQUAL LENGTH HEADERS

I was going thru some old files and found this testing (performed by the University of Northwestern Ohio some years ago).
They did a Test of EQUAL VS UNEQUAL LENGTH HEADERS on a Engine Dyno.
They ran at Street RPM test points vs Race RPM points.

The engine was a 525 CID Big Block Chevy but the comparison is valid.
This would cover the most common Pontiac Displacements (minus the 540/565 sized ones).

Engine rpm: The test points were in 100 rpm increments, from 3000 to 6000 rpm.
I am not going to post the dyno sheet as it was copied to an excel file and can't easily be posted.

They showed at 4500 rpm the torque difference was 715 vs 723 or 8 lbs/ft difference
The HP was 612.6 vs 619.5 or 6.9 horsepower difference. Unequal being actually BETTER.

They showed at 6000 rpm the torque difference was 610 vs 636 or 26 lbs/ft difference
The HP was 696.9 vs 726.6 or 29.7 horsepower difference. Unequal being actually BETTER, again.

So Stan, what is going on here? (Course it WAS a Big Block Chebby Engine).

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #2  
Old 01-08-2019, 01:31 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 15,328
Default

Tom, i posted near the same findings/ results a few months ago from a David Visard BB Chevy comparison and I was kicked in the head by folks here saying that it can't be true.
The results make perfect sence to me since only 4 sets and 4 sets of Intake ports due to there differing length will at the same rpm given a signal plane Intake , no less a duel plane!

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #3  
Old 01-08-2019, 01:32 PM
Stan Weiss's Avatar
Stan Weiss Stan Weiss is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,122
Default

Tom,
I was not at PRI this year but from what I was told someone from Burns gave a talk on this subject. From what I was told the equal length is less important than getting the tube / bends correctly. Maybe someone from PY was there and can give as more details.

Stan

__________________
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization - Cam Selection Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Download FREE 14 Trial IOP / Flow Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV/Flow_..._Day_Trial.php
Pontiac Pump Gas List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_gas.htm
Using PMD Block and Heads List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_pmd.htm
  #4  
Old 01-08-2019, 04:27 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,202
Default

Anyone do a header test like this with a 4 pattern camshaft, or simply changing the firing order around? 4-7 swap?? LS firing order??

Far as I know, the 4 pattern cams and LS fire cams are only available for SBC and BBC and SBF.

  #5  
Old 01-08-2019, 04:56 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones View Post
Anyone do a header test like this with a 4 pattern camshaft, or simply changing the firing order around? 4-7 swap?? LS firing order??

Far as I know, the 4 pattern cams and LS fire cams are only available for SBC and BBC and SBF.
4-7 lobe swaps are available on 55mm cam for Pontiac. Not with std journal. 50mm, not sure.

  #6  
Old 01-08-2019, 05:05 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,979
Default

A little off topic but if you have a custom set of headers that are clocked properly and then you change a firing order can it effect the performance?Tom

  #7  
Old 01-08-2019, 06:08 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,829
Default

In some of Jim McFarland's writing he mentioned that unequal can be better because each cylinder has a different rpm peak based on length and it helps average the total out better.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #8  
Old 01-08-2019, 06:39 PM
krisr's Avatar
krisr krisr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sydney, OZ
Posts: 1,459
Default

Before I built my headers I did a heap of research on this and spoke to some local header builders on the subject too, they all said length is irrelevant when you're using a collector (moreso if a choke collector) but what is important is to promote "Swirl" in the collector by tuning the firing order into the collector. Clockwise or counter clockwise didn't matter, provided that it swirled. Anyhow, I followed that logic and my 1.875" primaries on my 400 seem to work really well. Car runs a reasonable mph for a 400 and is still pretty good on the street.

__________________
'71 Holden HQ Monaro - 3850lbs race weight, 400c/i - 11.4 @ 120
'66 Pontiac GTO - 389, 4 speed street cruiser
  #9  
Old 01-08-2019, 07:42 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
A little off topic but if you have a custom set of headers that are clocked properly and then you change a firing order can it effect the performance?Tom
In a round about way that's what I was asking.

  #10  
Old 01-08-2019, 07:47 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragncar View Post
4-7 lobe swaps are available on 55mm cam for Pontiac. Not with std journal. 50mm, not sure.
They are available standard journal. My father is running a Lunati 4-7 swap in his.

But my comment was more related to BBC, SBC that the test was done on because those engines also have the LS firing order cam core available as well as the 4 pattern camshaft available, both of which aren't available for Pontiac that I'm aware of, and since the test was done on a BBC anyway, it had me curious. Just seems to me that would make a significant difference in header choices.

  #11  
Old 01-08-2019, 07:55 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
I was going thru some old files and found this testing (performed by the University of Northwestern Ohio some years ago).
They did a Test of EQUAL VS UNEQUAL LENGTH HEADERS on a Engine Dyno.
They ran at Street RPM test points vs Race RPM points.

The engine was a 525 CID Big Block Chevy but the comparison is valid.
This would cover the most common Pontiac Displacements (minus the 540/565 sized ones).

Engine rpm: The test points were in 100 rpm increments, from 3000 to 6000 rpm.
I am not going to post the dyno sheet as it was copied to an excel file and can't easily be posted.

They showed at 4500 rpm the torque difference was 715 vs 723 or 8 lbs/ft difference
The HP was 612.6 vs 619.5 or 6.9 horsepower difference. Unequal being actually BETTER.

They showed at 6000 rpm the torque difference was 610 vs 636 or 26 lbs/ft difference
The HP was 696.9 vs 726.6 or 29.7 horsepower difference. Unequal being actually BETTER, again.

So Stan, what is going on here? (Course it WAS a Big Block Chebby Engine).

Tom V.

Tom, Rob McCabe is right up the street from me. Getting older now but still building headers as far as I know.
http://www.mccaberacing.com/contact-us.html

I've worked beside him while he was building headers for some of the Pro Mod cars I was painting. Guy is a wealth of knowledge. Matter of fact before he settled here in AZ permanently he worked full time for the Nascar teams. His headers were part of a package that was winning so many races at the time that other teams tried to hire him, find trade secrets etc... and became a real cut throat deal. In the end he got tired of all the traveling, retired from Nascar and now builds headers for anything. Some of the best work I've ever seen. Next time I'm up there I'll pick his brain about this subject. I'd bet he could explain it to me in a few sentences what will work and what won't.

  #12  
Old 01-08-2019, 08:03 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 6,018
Default

First Guess: "Equal length" means nothing if it's the wrong length.

The exhaust gas pulse in the header tube has to resonate in sync with the exhaust valve closing, so that the resonation pulls a deep vacuum in the combustion chamber just as the exhaust valve shuts--trapping the vacuum which begins the pull of the intake charge into the cylinder. It's the miracle of Valve Overlap.

So the whole mess depends on about two dozen variables, ONE of which is the tube length.

Not surprising to me that unless a LOT of processor cycles went into the header design AND cam timing AND combustion chamber volume AND RPM AND... AND... AND... AND...that focusing on one of the variables results in unexpected performance.






I read--many years ago--that when Honda was building Formula 1 V-12s, four cylinders were tuned to one RPM band, another four were tuned to a higher RPM band, and the last four were tuned to the highest RPM band. This supposedly broadened the torque curve.

  #13  
Old 01-08-2019, 08:08 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones View Post
Tom, Rob McCabe is right up the street from me. Getting older now but still building headers as far as I know.
http://www.mccaberacing.com/contact-us.html

I've worked beside him while he was building headers for some of the Pro Mod cars I was painting. Guy is a wealth of knowledge. Matter of fact before he settled here in AZ permanently he worked full time for the Nascar teams. His headers were part of a package that was winning so many races at the time that other teams tried to hire him, find trade secrets etc... and became a real cut throat deal. In the end he got tired of all the traveling, retired from Nascar and now builds headers for anything. Some of the best work I've ever seen. Next time I'm up there I'll pick his brain about this subject. I'd bet he could explain it to me in a few sentences what will work and what won't.
If you look at the Ford stuff, the intake and exhaust systems are tuned based on what each cylinder wants which is why we spent so much time doing dyno testing. Course I never told you that. The Boosted stuff is a whole different game with a Turbo. Belt S/C stuff, still tune for each cylinder. We did a boosted Harley Truck one time, it had a special exhaust system that sounded like a Harley Chopper at idle, lol. "potato, potato, potato", LOL! Post up what Mr McCabe's thoughts are on the subject.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #14  
Old 01-08-2019, 08:18 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 9,551
Default

Anyone built headers from the Pipemax dimensions?

  #15  
Old 01-08-2019, 11:02 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,530
Default

Length don't matter with 4:1 because 4:1 a wrongk architecture. Maybe a focused/ "merged" 4:1 Collector will show length preferences.

Tri-Y or SD-421 style and the lengths will matter and yield better acceleration (wideband RPM). I'd like to see TRI-Y with merged Collectors...cast?

Then there is those open Zoomie where they play at 6000-9500 RPM.

GOAL: all 8 CYLs showing same HP within 1HP of each CYL, proving uniform inhale.

  #16  
Old 01-08-2019, 11:17 PM
bendutro bendutro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragncar View Post
4-7 lobe swaps are available on 55mm cam for Pontiac. Not with std journal. 50mm, not sure.
The cam I just received from Bullet cams is a 4/7 swap. The blanks are OTS even if the grind is custom.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017