| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aftermarket cranks are famous for having a large radius.They make narrow rod bearing for them.As said I had a slight issue with a rear main when I took a engine down.The very back was in the brass but nothing like this.Was never enough to even feel it when the crank was turned without the seal.Just something to be aware of when using aftermarket cranks.When I got there today all the caps were off.Im sure the seal was toast with the heat that crank and bearing saw.Tom
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeh it roasted the 1 piece rear main seal.
A little surprised it didn't make an oily mess back there with it being out of commission ? Maybe some of the desintegrated seal debris plugged up some oil flow. Something caused #4 thrust to turn in the cap And then there's the scuffing in the cylinders that might have been lack of oil ... and the spark plug gaps that are another enigma unto themselves. Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I tried to post a pic of the block saddle but wont post for some reason.The seal just melted out of it.The clevite left a imprint in the saddle that you can feel with your finger nail.Maybe it will show up as I did the down load like I did the rest.Im sure Mike will get some more info for us next week as he is REALLY interested.tom
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 4 cap did not turn!Optical illusion !All other bearings are fine.Tom
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Try one more time.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dabgummit . lol
In Napier's pics before disassembly, and your pics after crank removed - it looks to be turned out of index in all those pics. (#4 thrust) The other shells in your pics are still indexed proper. You got me ! victim of circumstance and opticals ! The #4 surfaces didn't really look bad - i believe you |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
There you go!
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
mysteries to be solved:
plug gap chipped cam gear post # 75. valve pocket placement. looks to me that the valve was hitting the edge of the pocket. what caused #5 to get so hot.
__________________
GOOD IDEAS ARE OFTEN FOUND ABANDONED IN THE DUST OF PROCRASTINATION |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
The hone was all the way through!Tom
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I take the "finished" cranks from suppliers to the machine shop and pay for their inspection. I've had several reports come back with journal taper and one bent crank. Don't get me started on problems with rods and pistons that either I have found or the machine shop found on their inspections.
To quote Ken Crocie, "We are now the quality control inspectors". Reference a previous posted photo that I enlarged - is the seal contact surface tore up as much as the photo makes it look? If so, could the seal friction heated the rear of the crank enough to take up clearance and seize the bearing?
__________________
Mick Batson 1967 original owner Tyro Blue/black top 4-speed HO GTO with all the original parts stored safely away -- 1965 Catalina Safari Wagon. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mick,we will know more when Mike can get into it.He is having to shoe horn this in between jobs he already had going.One is my 383-301 engine.Tom
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Any updates?
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I spoke to the machinist on Friday. He had just received a new set of main bearings that he needed to make a couple of tests, specifically a new #5 bearing. He said he'd do those today or tomorrow and let me know.
His goal is to get some specific measurements on the radius fillet, bearing width, bearing chamfer, endplay, interference, etc... before I contact Butler and Scat. I read through the warranty info on Butler's and Scat's website and don't see any meaningful recourse based on the specifics of their written warranty, assuming I can demonstrate a clear manufacturing error. Let's say Butler/Scat acknowledge an error, what can I expect? After this, I'll get a quote, soup-to-nuts, on a long block and evalauate what I can swing. I will post on this thread as soon as I get an update.
__________________
1965 Pontiac GTO 455/469 w/ #48 Heads, '65 Tri-Power 9.25:1 CR Stump Puller Cam Muncie M22W 1st-2.56 2nd-1.75 3rd-1.37 4th-1.00 3.55 Rear Differential Front: 225/60R15 Height: 25.6" Rear: 275/60R15 Height: 28" |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi did he say which mains he ordered? Should be what came with the stroker kit.
__________________
65 Tempest, 400, TH400 86 Fiero SE 2.8 |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think he was ordering at least a couple brands.He was going to get a set of Clevites but wont run them.Tom
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Probably needs mains (and rods) for a large filet crank throw?
I always had to special order them? (used a different number for them than the standard type of bearings)
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! W.E.C moment "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm assuming he could look at what came out vs. what he has in hand and compare them.
__________________
1965 Pontiac GTO 455/469 w/ #48 Heads, '65 Tri-Power 9.25:1 CR Stump Puller Cam Muncie M22W 1st-2.56 2nd-1.75 3rd-1.37 4th-1.00 3.55 Rear Differential Front: 225/60R15 Height: 25.6" Rear: 275/60R15 Height: 28" |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
John,I have been able to find rods but have not found mains that are made for a large radius?Tom
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
You can use an old fashioned bearing scraper or a file or even a sharp knife and dress down the side of the bearing to clear the filet on the crank. I just did this last year when assembling my 383 SBC. The machinist showed me the trick when he sold me the bearings......it takes a little time, but the upside is more bearing material supporting the rod or crank than the thin 'race' bearings supply. YMMV...
__________________
Jeff |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
I’d never heard of King bearings when I was assembling my ‘68 400 stock crank engine. I was initially considering clevite. For whatever reason that I don’t remember, my machinist recommended king, and now 8k miles later, no problems.
|
| Reply |
|
|