Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 10-17-2020, 08:58 AM
slowbird's Avatar
slowbird slowbird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 10,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve25 View Post
Yup! Due to the geometry of a roller and the stock block limit of a .842" lifter a solid lifter lobe as I posted can kick the valves open faster initially, but for the spring pressures needed to attain 7000 rpm or so the only advantage in running a roller in the 600 hp range is the start of the slight reduction in fiction.

Number 48 casting heads where never used on production 428 motors be they HO combo's or not, the number 46 casting on 360 hp 2 bbl 428s are often mistaken for number 48s!

If a 428 did slip out of the factory with number 48 heads it done as a one or two of situation so as to not tie up / stall the assembly line .

This has been seen many times as in the case of a late run motor that came stock with one 6X casting and one 5C casting.
Can you show dyno proof?
A flat tappet is limited by velocity (the edge of the lifter catches the lobe and kills everything) a roller isn't. For the same amount of duration you get more area with the roller vs a flat tappet.


Last edited by slowbird; 10-17-2020 at 09:33 AM.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017