FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Unless the car is lowered a bunch or raised with hi jackers from the 70's lol this isn't rocket science, get the motor/trans angle and adjust the pinion down or up accordingly to what ever chassis u have to get it to parallel under power. I never worry about the driveshaft and what angle its at
__________________
Darby 74 Grandville 2Dr 455 c.i 4550# 2011 1.60 60 ft,7.33@94.55-11.502@117.74 2017, 74 firebird -3600 lbs (all bests) 1.33 60 ft, 6.314@108.39 9.950@134.32 M/T 275/60 ET SS Drag Radial 2023,(Pontiac 505) 1.27 60 ft, 5.97@112.86, 9.48@139.31.... 275/60 Radial Pro's |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
The 78 Service Manual has a section on checking drive angles.
(4A-4) Here is a clip-shot and the angles: (of course the attachment is small on PY)
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
I wrote these as a development engineer for inclusion in the S truck service manual. Hopefully they are self explanatory.
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible '63 Grand Prix '65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer '74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 "Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Keith Seymore For This Useful Post: | ||
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Keith for taking the time and effort to post that well written report.
It was my concern over my front working angle being too large that generated my initial post. I will be looking to reduce that angle in the future and any needed change to the rear working angle for better alignment under load in the near future. DV |
Reply |
|
|