Suspension TECH Including Brakes, Wheels and tires

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-2024, 09:07 AM
scott70's Avatar
scott70 scott70 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maine
Posts: 2,731
Default Front A arm bushings

Anyone recommend a certain front A arm bushing kit that they like? Also Poly or rubber? 70 gto … mine has half oval half round. Thanks

__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007
(cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD
1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.45 @ 88.1 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.19 60ft.Owned since 86'
  #2  
Old 11-23-2024, 01:27 PM
jwcfbd's Avatar
jwcfbd jwcfbd is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 906
Default

I've been using Poly in my firebird for years without complaints. Is this what your bushing look like?
https://p-s-t.com/i-23159918-polygra...ARM%20BUSHINGS

__________________
67 Firebird Convertible
  #3  
Old 11-23-2024, 03:35 PM
scott70's Avatar
scott70 scott70 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maine
Posts: 2,731
Default

Yes. Ive heard in the past of people complaining about poly being squeaky. Ive got poly in the back,,,PST i believe but didnt know if the front end was a different story of what people like.

__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007
(cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD
1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.45 @ 88.1 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.19 60ft.Owned since 86'
  #4  
Old 11-23-2024, 04:07 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 17,613
Default

Can’t go wrong with rubber bushings.

I guess it depends on what you really want out of your car.

For ultimate handling I’d be going for aftermarket control arms with a delalum bushing or similar.

For just a nice front end rebuild use rubber.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/3.08
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
1966 VW Type 2 Single Cab Pickup 140hp 2276
1956 VW Type 2 Panel Van 36hp 1200
1957 VW Type 1 Beetle 180hp 2276
  #5  
Old 11-23-2024, 05:46 PM
ponchjoe's Avatar
ponchjoe ponchjoe is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South of the Indy 500
Posts: 3,048
Default

I won’t use poly for a cruiser. My 68 road noticeably harsher when I put them in. If you’re going to build a corner carver and do sway bars and other suspension performance mods than by all means put poly in.

__________________
The More People I Meet, The More I Love My Dogs!
  #6  
Old 11-23-2024, 06:17 PM
jwcfbd's Avatar
jwcfbd jwcfbd is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scott70 View Post
Yes. Ive heard in the past of people complaining about poly being squeaky. Ive got poly in the back,,,PST i believe but didnt know if the front end was a different story of what people like.

Yeah the Polygraphite and a good coating of the grease that comes with them I never had a problem.

__________________
67 Firebird Convertible
  #7  
Old 11-24-2024, 11:55 AM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 4,540
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

I always recommend either staying with Rubber if you're worried about NVH, or going directly to Delrin bushings. Poly bushings can have a tendency to squeak and while they do offer more resistance to deflection than Rubber, if you're driving your car in a way that you're worried about that, you should have solid bushings and eliminate all deflection from the bushing.

I've been running solid bushings for years and there is no discernable increase in NVH that I can tell. I had PST polygraphite stuff before that. It's been my experience that people that state the car will get harsh with solid suspension bushings have never spent much of any time in a car with them.

Defaulting to the two ends of that spectrum, if you are at all worried about NVH, stick with rubber. If you are more concerned with handling, go straight to Delrin bushings

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
  #8  
Old 11-24-2024, 11:56 AM
scott70's Avatar
scott70 scott70 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maine
Posts: 2,731
Default

Not trying to make it a road race car or anything so I'll probably just stick with rubber. Now I'll just see if there's a quality kit out there for it.

__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007
(cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD
1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.45 @ 88.1 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.19 60ft.Owned since 86'
  #9  
Old 11-25-2024, 11:31 AM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 16,206
Default

What's in it now that you are replacing? And do you have aftermarket springs?

Those two questions will give you a more accurate recommendation.

If you are using factory springs, and you switch to a more easily articulation suspension setup, the factory springs will be too soft. (and you will notice it)

Poly bushings are more free-articulating bushings than OE, there are no 'teeth' on the inner sleeves, so you don't have to worry about tightening them while the car is loaded (on the ground).

OE rubber bushings have the inner sleeve actually bonded to the rubber. That provides a certain amount of 'load reduction'. When you tight the bushing, the 'teeth' bite into the frame mounts, and resist a certain amount of twisting.

In later 2nd gen F-bodies, a harder durometer bushings was used as part of the WS6 handling package, which were tuned to the springs & shocks (rate & valving). No one ever complained about harshness with those.

Free-articulating suspensions usually benefit from different shocks than OE type.

Most have rubber body bushings, so I honestly can't understand how people can say the ride gets 'harsher', it's almost unmeasurable. But I think it's more due to the fact that a more free-articulating suspension makes it more 'sensitive' to shock selection (and spring). And THAT is what I believe people related the 'harshness' to. (And not the bushings themselves).


.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #10  
Old 11-25-2024, 08:48 PM
locomotivebreath's Avatar
locomotivebreath locomotivebreath is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: northern kentucky
Posts: 589
Default

I have the energy suspension bushings and coated them liberally with their grease - at least 12 years ago ! Just got the car on the road last November . 4k miles later , no squeaks , absolutely not harsh and handles great . They are USA made . What’s the quality of rubber these days ?

__________________
When I wore a younger man's clothes
  #11  
Old 11-25-2024, 11:36 PM
Entropy11's Avatar
Entropy11 Entropy11 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: North Tonawanda, NY 14120
Posts: 430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b-man View Post
Can’t go wrong with rubber bushings.

I guess it depends on what you really want out of your car.

For ultimate handling I’d be going for aftermarket control arms with a delalum bushing or similar.

For just a nice front end rebuild use rubber.
Totally agree.

If you do go with rubber check out the Metrix Premium brand. Much better than the junk Moog ships out currently.

The Following User Says Thank You to Entropy11 For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 11-26-2024, 11:37 PM
scott70's Avatar
scott70 scott70 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maine
Posts: 2,731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455 View Post
What's in it now that you are replacing? And do you have aftermarket springs?

Those two questions will give you a more accurate recommendation.

If you are using factory springs, and you switch to a more easily articulation suspension setup, the factory springs will be too soft. (and you will notice it)

Poly bushings are more free-articulating bushings than OE, there are no 'teeth' on the inner sleeves, so you don't have to worry about tightening them while the car is loaded (on the ground).

OE rubber bushings have the inner sleeve actually bonded to the rubber. That provides a certain amount of 'load reduction'. When you tight the bushing, the 'teeth' bite into the frame mounts, and resist a certain amount of twisting.

In later 2nd gen F-bodies, a harder durometer bushings was used as part of the WS6 handling package, which were tuned to the springs & shocks (rate & valving). No one ever complained about harshness with those.

Free-articulating suspensions usually benefit from different shocks than OE type.

Most have rubber body bushings, so I honestly can't understand how people can say the ride gets 'harsher', it's almost unmeasurable. But I think it's more due to the fact that a more free-articulating suspension makes it more 'sensitive' to shock selection (and spring). And THAT is what I believe people related the 'harshness' to. (And not the bushings themselves).


.
What’s in it now are the original rubber bushings. While under the car I noticed at least one had some of the rubber was hanging out of the shell. Original springs and sway bars. My gto has the ride and handling package.About 2 years ago I replaced the original shocks with bilsteins on all 4 corners. I mean they were spiral shocks … date coded 1969. All the bushings in the rear are poly…figured it would help against wheel hop. I have no squeaks back there. Supposedly my car has 47,000 original miles on it.

__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007
(cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD
1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.45 @ 88.1 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.19 60ft.Owned since 86'

Last edited by scott70; 11-26-2024 at 11:42 PM.
  #13  
Old 11-27-2024, 02:00 AM
Sprocket's Avatar
Sprocket Sprocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 247
Default

If you want some factory quality rubber bushings, I have a complete set, all NIB.

__________________
'70 GP Model J
467 Butler ported Edelbrock D-ports
Torker II intake with Holley Sniper 2
CompCams 236/242 hydraulic roller
Tribal Tubes tri-y headers full 3" stainless exhaust
TH400, 3.50 9" CurrieTrac, 245/35-20 Front, 275/35-20 Rear
  #14  
Old 11-27-2024, 07:08 AM
rolling money pits's Avatar
rolling money pits rolling money pits is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,662
Default

Poly, in the rear control arms, is generally considered a no-no. Its inherent stiffness/harder durometer doesn’t allow the rear to articulate properly and bind up.

Rubber or one of the “spherical” variants are typically used back there for increased handling.

Poly in front, no issues, IMO. I’ve used them with zero problems, Energy products to be specific. First time you get the Energy poly grease on your bare hands…you’ll understand why they don’t squeak.

__________________
costs too much
  #15  
Old 11-27-2024, 07:44 AM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 16,206
Default

The bind in the rear is in regards to the upper bushing in the housing 'ears', they are fine everywhere else.

But true on the spherical ones, it's the way to go.

If you have poly in the rear and are fine with them, makes sense to go poly in the front.



.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017