Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2026, 01:06 PM
Bermudagto's Avatar
Bermudagto Bermudagto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Richardson
Posts: 135
Default Holley carburetor has No manifold Vacuum inlet ports! What to do

I can’t locate any lower manifold inlet ports on this new Campbell Holley Carb!
Do I have to resort to a gas cannister instead?
I also need to tap vacuum for TH400.
Using the rear intake inlet for brake booster vacuum.
Can I use a splitter off of rear Intake inlet for BOTH brake and Transmission vacuum?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image6.jpeg
Views:	58
Size:	68.0 KB
ID:	670225   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4489.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	81.4 KB
ID:	670226   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4488.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	52.9 KB
ID:	670227   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4487.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	75.6 KB
ID:	670228   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4483.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	77.6 KB
ID:	670229  


  #2  
Old 05-17-2026, 03:18 PM
SRGN SRGN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 166
Default

Some Holley base plates have the bosses for vacuum fittings machined but not drilled. Look at the base of the carb, you may need to drill/tap and add screw in fittings.

  #3  
Old 05-17-2026, 03:37 PM
Bermudagto's Avatar
Bermudagto Bermudagto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Richardson
Posts: 135
Default

Well there are 2 stamped circles on the lower front of carb. I’m supposed to drill one out and add threads to it for a vacuum inlet? Holy S..t that looks difficult. See pic
Oh my carb is an Ultra XP Campbell 4150 so I just read those don’t always come with any vacuum ports. Hopefully I can just use the main port in my Intake for everything? Brakes/PCV/Transmission vacuum ?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4490.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	44.1 KB
ID:	670232  


Last edited by Bermudagto; 05-17-2026 at 03:46 PM.
  #4  
Old 05-17-2026, 03:57 PM
SRGN SRGN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 166
Default

Ok, that's a "race" baseplate. You can run a carb spacer and drill/tap any ports you need, but I'd recommend not teeing off the brake booster line.

The Following User Says Thank You to SRGN For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 05-18-2026, 01:00 AM
NeighborsComplaint's Avatar
NeighborsComplaint NeighborsComplaint is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Elgin
Posts: 2,591
Default

Yes, that’s a no-no. The brake booster vacuum is always a dedicated connection.

__________________
Triple Black 1971 GTO
The Following User Says Thank You to NeighborsComplaint For This Useful Post:
  #6  
Old 05-18-2026, 04:27 AM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 6,093
Default

Not being able to share a vacuum connection for the PCV and brake booster must be one of the longer myths.
Think for a moment about where the vacuum comes from.
Exactly, from a source under the carburetor's throttle blades, so there is no difference between the vacuum for both functions, the vacuum is taken from the same place.
Then there are those who are afraid that vapors from the PCV would find their way into the brake booster if you connect the hoses to the same port.
This is a waste of thought, it doesn't matter if the vacuum for the brake booster is taken from a T-fitting on the PCV hose or a separate connection under the throttle blades, the vapors are there too before they go to the cylinders for combustion.
And then, not least, the engineers have already solved the problem of vapors finding their way into the brake booster by having the brake booster use a check valve.
So it's mostly for practical reasons that the PCV and brake booster have their own ports in the design, some engines actually uses a shared port from factory for this.

HTH

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
The Following User Says Thank You to Kenth For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 05-18-2026, 06:58 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,511
Default

Thumbs up to the above !

Full manifold is full manifold vacuum , but with a duel plane intake with no carb spacer you must take the vacuum off the carb since that’s the only passage that will link both high and low plenums to provide you with FULL manifold vacuum.

Do not dump the pcv valve into a vacuum port that your intake might have that only goes into 1 runner, as that’s not full manifold vacuum.

I have seen that too many times to count.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post:
  #8  
Old 05-18-2026, 08:14 AM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 16,206
Default

Those 2 lower stamped circles are in the bowl, and are for jet access without having to take the bowl off. Why they are not slotted for a screwdriver or have some other type of method for R&R is beyond me.

Yes you can T off the booster port, and just as a comment, common recommendation is to make it as close to the carb/port as possible.

Not sure why that's recommended, but felt I should mention it.

Note that an intake runner fitting is 'generally' acceptable, but could potentially see 'pulses'.

Note that if a trans vac module fails/leaks, it could potentially take out the booster diaphragm.

I forget where OE pulls vacuum for trans but 'think' it was from a runner. This might be due to the risk of the booster diaphragm contamination.

I'm still at 1 cup of coffee, so be gentle w me! Heheh!


.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #9  
Old 05-20-2026, 12:16 PM
Goatracer1 Goatracer1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NH
Posts: 4,265
Default

Some of the older Pontiacs had a vacuum fitting off the back of the carb that had 4-5 connections. The big one was for brake booster, medium sized one was for trans and the smaller ones for different items that required vacuum. If the factory can do it so can you.

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Goatracer1 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017