Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-03-2022, 06:22 PM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 22,514
Default

John Witzke has a W72 pdf that has a lot of info on the W72 from 1977 to 1979.

W72 Technical Information


__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!

W.E.C moment


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
  #22  
Old 06-03-2022, 08:38 PM
BDH79TA's Avatar
BDH79TA BDH79TA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 63
Default

One thing missing from your comparisons is that there were 2 Pontiac 400 engines offered at the time. The 180 HP had the 6X-8 heads which were around 100 cc head. The 220 HP had the slightly more aggressive cam and the 6X-4 head that advertised closer to 92 cc head. This is where the performance boost came from. Not the type of muffler or cat used. However, the 220 HP did use the dual resonators instead of the transverse muffler because of the need for a little better flow. I haven't searched the in depth info on the difference in the cams between the two engines as it's never been something I've needed or wanted to know. I'd imagine they did use different cams though.

__________________
[/SIGPIC]

Two marriages and one long term relationship later and it's the T/A that's always still there.

When referencing gas, "regular" used to have an entirely different meaning.
  #23  
Old 07-12-2026, 10:07 AM
KSZR KSZR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Iowa
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Fix View Post
My 78 180 HP and the 2.56s ran high 14s-barely in 3rd.
Can you tell us a little more? Was it stock? Thanks

  #24  
Old 07-12-2026, 10:57 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,511
Default

See if you can track down on line the Sept 2006 issue of High Performance Pontiac magazine.

In it they had most detailed article on the 3 Cams that were used from 77 to 79 in the 400s that one could hope find.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
The Following User Says Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post:
  #25  
Old 07-12-2026, 11:05 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,706
Default

That was stock. Convertor everything. I had Glenn Tinsley's shop (that leased John Clegg/HO's 74 TA) add a228/228 @0.050 Cam Dynamics and it went a little faster but had to add a little pusher electric fuel pump as top of second would run the Q jet out of fuel. Stock Q jet even with an HO Racing rejet kit was lean in the idle circuit , eventually fixed with n SR 73 SD Qjet.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected]
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed
The Following User Says Thank You to Skip Fix For This Useful Post:
  #26  
Old 07-12-2026, 01:48 PM
KSZR KSZR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Iowa
Posts: 170
Default

Very nice!

I have a stock '78 L78 that needs exhaust and one manifold gasket is blown. Was curious what to expect, or what potential it has basically stock once it is up and going.

  #27  
Old 07-12-2026, 02:27 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,511
Default

From the article in HPP that I posted about above here is what the program from an engine Analyzer predicted for power out of the 3 different cams used in the W72 motors.

Unfortunately I believe the L78 motors had less compression so you will fall short of these numbers if your heads have not been milled.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3995.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	89.9 KB
ID:	673218  

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post:
  #28  
Old 07-12-2026, 02:57 PM
KSZR KSZR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Iowa
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve25 View Post
From the article in HPP that I posted about above here is what the program from an engine Analyzer predicted for power out of the 3 different cams used in the W72 motors.

Unfortunately I believe the L78 motors had less compression so you will fall short of these numbers if your heads have not been milled.
Very cool, thanks for finding that!

Sounds like the summit 2800 or something similar would be a nice upgrade as far as aftermarket.

A pypes exhaust system should give a nice power bump, which I need anyway because everything behind the converter is pretty rotten.

  #29  
Old 07-13-2026, 07:17 PM
SD455DJ SD455DJ is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 3,649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSZR View Post
Very cool, thanks for finding that!

Sounds like the summit 2800 or something similar would be a nice upgrade as far as aftermarket.

A pypes exhaust system should give a nice power bump, which I need anyway because everything behind the converter is pretty rotten.
Here is the dyno session on a '78 W72 400 with the Summit 2800 cam...

Dan had a good dyno session today with the W72 400. He rebuilt the original numbers matching engine with .040" over Icon forged pistons w/4.5 cc valve reliefs that were .006" out of the hole and with .045" x 4.328" Felpro head gaskets to provide .039" quench depth. The 6X-4 heads were minimally cut for trueness and measured 92.45 cc's average for a final static compression ratio of 8.75 to 1. Dan replaced the cast rods with forged Eagle H-beam rods. New 1-pc valves (2.11/1.66) with CC dual springs were installed. A Summit 2800 cam (204/214/112 @ .422”/.444”) with new 'old' Crane hydraulic lifters along with a new Melling 60 psi oil pump. The one modification was the use of old factory D-port ram air exhaust manifolds with the 2.1" outlets with Pypes 2.5" mandrel headpipes. The original 17058263 Q-jet on the factory cast iron intake with the EGR system and plumbing were reinstalled.

The base runs were made with 42 degrees total timing in by 3000 rpm, 45 primary rods/74 jets/CH secondary rods on an I hanger. The 3rd (and best) base pull made a corrected 360.3 hp @ 5000 rpm/456.1 lb-ft torque @ 3600 rpm (351.2 hp/444.5 lb-ft uncorrected). The correction factor was a low 1.026 as the weather conditions were very good...low humidity, high barometer, and very cool temperatures (65 in dyno cell). After rejetting the carb to 40 primary metering rods/72 jets/DA secondary rods on an 'I' hanger (same total timing at 42 degrees), employing the 'big' dyno room dumps for the headpipes, and installing the air cleaner base, the max hp jumped to 371.4 hp @ 5000 rpm/459.2 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm (362.0 hp/447.6 lb-ft uncorrected) on the final pull (#14). The highest torque reading was on pull #13 at 460.3 lbft.

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	W72 400 Big Dumps & AC Base.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	79.1 KB
ID:	673313  

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SD455DJ For This Useful Post:
  #30  
Old 07-16-2026, 02:51 AM
mrmark1957 mrmark1957 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 84
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerry455 View Post
I bought a 20,000 mile, used W72 Gold 1978 T/A in the spring of 1982. I removed the cat, richened the carb, quickened the ignition curve and opened the scoop. It made a world of difference. I was beating a lot of my friends "faster cars". They were surprised that my T/A ran that well. It ran really strong. Most people used to laugh at the T/As, calling them the disco cars. I stopped a lot of those comments when I beat their cars.
I did the exact same mods to my wife's gold '79 400 4 speed car. The car ran 16.1 at 86 mph all stock. Felt WAY faster with the mods but my BIL wrecked the car before I could run it at the dragstrip again

  #31  
Old 07-16-2026, 10:15 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,706
Default

I have the 2801 in a low CR 400 and idles smooth.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected]
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed
  #32  
Old 07-17-2026, 07:42 AM
KSZR KSZR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Iowa
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmark1957 View Post
I did the exact same mods to my wife's gold '79 400 4 speed car. The car ran 16.1 at 86 mph all stock. Felt WAY faster with the mods but my BIL wrecked the car before I could run it at the dragstrip again
Damn brother in law, they can't be trusted. That sucks.

  #33  
Old 07-18-2026, 01:38 AM
mrmark1957 mrmark1957 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 84
Default

He spun out on a damp road and put it backwards through a fence and the rear of the car stopped against a tree. He compressed the back of the car so much that the trunk lid was crumpled up and he had to climb out the window because the doors wouldn't open. Wife took the insurance money and bought a Mitsubishi Eclipse 5 speed. That was a sad day.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017