FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
hehe...this thread is kinda freaking me out.
i had a BOP seal in the old 462 with the Speed Pro rings and no leaks. there's a BOP seal in the the new 474 with the Total Seal file-to-fit rings. i've got an evac kit and relatively low compression (11.5 or 11.7:1), so hopefully it won't be a problem. edit- i bought my seal from the Dude, so if it leaks i'm blaming Danee. 97 Trans Am 383 stroker and some bolt-ons 11.94 @ 119 74 Formula 3800 lbs., d-ports, 9" slicks 11.84 @ 116 |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Ken you are right. This thing leaked oil so bad that you really couldn't tell where it came from. I have used several of the BOP seals and also the felpro seal and never have had a problem other than last spring, and we tried everything we could think of and Schottler said to me ( Inever liked those damn total seals anyway so lets re ring it) and we did and never had another problem. The Chevy guys are still giving me static about it.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
My crank is a '67 428 Arma-steel unit, .10 /.10, polished, etc... In a 69 +.065 428 w/ Program billet center caps & factory front/rear caps.
Line bore/hone & entire recip. assy. balanced. Milodon RR pan, Spott's scraper, Canton tray, & Dyna gear pump. Nothing else has even the slight inclination of a leak. SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Just a thought, Larry, but how far back does your pan scraper go?
Does it extend near the rear main seal area? If you get the scraper to where it is pulling the oil off the crank nicely and do not have a open area for it to dump the oil to, it will run right down the scraper and flood the seal area. Check that out. May not be that but you never know. Tom V.
__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
That's a plausible circumstance Tom.
I'll be checking it out upon disassembly this time. But seems to me that the seal should still be designed w/ enough tension to hold back the oil flow, no? SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
No,the slinger ring should keep the majority of the oil from the seal. (slinger ring holes open?)
If the tray extends back enough to dump the oil behind the ring it could be too much for the seal to handle under pressure. But if it leaked while not running like when tilting the engine back, I would say it's not conforming to the crank. johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>there's a BOP seal in the the new 474 with the Total Seal file-to-fit rings. i've got an evac kit and relatively low compression (11.5 or 11.7:1), so hopefully it won't be a problem.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
"rumair"....i have the same combination(w/total seal rings) with no evac kit and 11.5:1 comp., using the BOP seal. I'm hampered with oil leaks past the valley pan and out the dip stick tube but NO LEAKS past the BOP seal or oil pan gaskets. Working on re-installation of the KRE valley pan now and figuring out a way to keep the dipstick in the tube. The crankcase pressure is vented to atmosphere via K&N type breather in each valve cover. I'll try enlarging the hole in each breather to see if that helps. I also run a Spotts scraper but no windage tray. Wasn't it posted at one time that if using the Canton windage tray, that a scraper was not necessary? 1973 SD455 T/A 1979 SE474 T/A http://community.webshots.com/album/16587603rOyvmFCiHs
__________________
Home of WFO Hyperformance Shaker induction. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
larry- i don't recall reading about not needing the scraper with the windage tray.
i chose to run the scraper without the windage tray to minimize possible sealing issues on the bottom end. i will also be using the spotts aluminum valley pan. i've got my dipstick tube hole plugged, so no worries there. like i said, hopefully the evac. kit (moroso kit...5/8" heater hose from breathers to collectors) will help me avoid this problem. 97 Trans Am 383 stroker and some bolt-ons 11.94 @ 119 74 Formula 3800 lbs., d-ports, 9" slicks 11.84 @ 116 |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I'll be putting one of the BOP seals in my 73 455 soon due to it leaking (have a rope seal now). I also used the cadillac seal, but it leaked too. If my crank has been ground and polished 010 will this cause a problem? According to the shop sheet it looks like the rod and main journals have been ground.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Wade Congdon:
Larry, When you say its at the parting line, do you mean at the crank or along the cap to block surface? There is obviously something not right here. When you get it apart contact us and we can go over some measurements. Wade<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Wade, you've got mail. I've got it all tore down, cleaned, & awaiting y'alls reply to start checking dimensions. SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Really:
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
See:
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
No ****:
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
True:
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Got flow?
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Hello....???? Wade, Mark.... whassup???
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Thats the slow side of the garage why dont you show them whats up in the fast side of the garage?
T-Shirts For Sale "Dude Free In 2003" OLD COMBO 8.90 @157 mph 3424 LBS. 77 Trans Am All Steel, on 10" tires New COMBO 8.79 @ 161 mph 1.42 60 ft 3,455lbs
__________________
77 Trans Am All Steel, on 10" tires 8.30 @ 165 mph 3,380 LBS Mat it! Spray it! Chute it! Just another 8 Second Pass! |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
larry- looks like a bunch of low budget parts there.
97 Trans Am 383 stroker and some bolt-ons 11.94 @ 119 74 Formula 3800 lbs., d-ports, 9" slicks 11.84 @ 116 |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah.....and for cryin' out loud, trim those intake gaskets so they match!
1973 SD455 T/A 1979 SE474 T/A http://community.webshots.com/album/16587603rOyvmFCiHs
__________________
Home of WFO Hyperformance Shaker induction. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Ray Cox:
Thats the slow side of the garage why dont you show them whats up in the fast side of the garage? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> You mean this junk: SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY!
__________________
SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOMELAND SECURITY! |
Reply |
|
|