| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by 76TA:
By the way...your all poindexters!!! you're all poindexters! You tell 'em I'm comin' and Hell's comin' with me, ya hear? Hell's comin' with me! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks culick!
Street ´69 Firebird. 3800 lbs with driver. 455 with D-ports. 275x50 drag radials. Stock suspension. [email protected] (motor only)[email protected] (+150hpNOS)
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
that was supposed to be accelerate the fuel (second to last sentence)
__________________
GOOD IDEAS ARE OFTEN FOUND ABANDONED IN THE DUST OF PROCRASTINATION |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
culick. I got into a heated debate with a couple of other guys on another board in this issue. I was advocating exactly what you were saying but they refused to believe me. Two of them were board moderators too.
The argument that they relied on was something like this " The weight of the gasoline (thus the size of the fuel line my comment) is completely irrelevant due to the fact that the fuel system is a closed system. The acceleration affects the fuel system as whole." How do I convince these guys (I believe they are engineers) that they are wrong? Street ´69 Firebird. 3800 lbs with driver. 455 with D-ports. 275x50 drag radials. Stock suspension. [email protected] (motor only)[email protected] (+150hpNOS)
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater |
| Reply |
|
|