FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
I would value it at $12500. A lot of the value is in the little pieces that would take forever to round up.
__________________
1989 Automotive Hall of Fame Inductee |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There are some deep pockets on this board as a couple of members have offered substantially more that this. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
se428bandit-i have had a couple of wagons,maybe you have heard of the RANDY WILLIAMS 63 2 DOOR RACER-i owned it after randy died.maybe you saw the flyer this year fot the AMES TRIPOWER NATIONALS.oh yes,i believe there was a picture of MY 61 bonneville wagon-ex nhra record holder doing a big smoker in the burnout box. guess that I would be a REAL PONTIAC person.what is on your list of wagons that YOU have owned?i have also owned 3 other PONTIAC wagons.eagerly waiting for your reply.the wagon that this engine came out of pulled up just a little short,as far as i am concerned.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
I'll trade a RARE 1980 Lemans with LS-5 engine option,
Last edited by se428bandit; 10-01-2008 at 07:37 PM. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
thats what i thought.
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Go back to the 'Judges Only' forum and piss on the threads in there.
__________________
If it ain't broke, fix it 'till it is |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
shroud
this set up the is the same as the 70-2 raiv/HO s, minus the metal elbow
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
I should have said bare minimum $12500
__________________
1989 Automotive Hall of Fame Inductee |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
That is so cool to see that RA IV engine in its "all there" glory!!
Thanks for sharing, and here are some of mine when it got opened up for comparison sake.
__________________
Mike/Illinois |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
those caps look weak
__________________
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
you fellers are hill-arious!
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Kyle,
I have heard two completely different deals about RA4 balancers. Both guys were RA4 experts (they told me so) and they were 100% certain. 1 -RA 4 has physically bigger or thicker balancer. 2 -RA 4 used stock size balancer but had a little x stamped on front. One of them must be wrong. What does yours look like? |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
3. I heard they were heavier, looked like the normal ones.
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Theres is a different part # in Pontiac's catalog listed for RAIV only.
Enjoyed see'n the vlv train. Been 20 yrs since i've seen an original set up. Think i may still have a set of nos rkr studs and prevailing torgue lock nuts somewhere.
__________________
If you cant drive from gas pump to gas pump across the map, its not a street car. http://s207.photobucket.com/albums/b...hop/?start=100 |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
Judge273. Is that an Armasteel or a nodular crank in that RA 4?
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
I can read Arma Steel on the first weight.
__________________
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam 1971 Trans Am 455HO M22; Cameo White / Blue 1971 GTO Convertible 455 M40; Starlight Black / Black |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
RAIV balancer physically appears and is identical to regular Pontiac V8 balancer. Difference was it was balanced to a higher tolerance due to the high RPM that a RAIV engine would see in use |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
For investigative purposes I removed a little patina from this engine tonight. I cleaned the harmonic balancer and compared it to two others and I can see no visual differences. There was alot of paint missing on the outside ring so the surface rust hid any markings that may have been there. From what I see there is no difference from a "regular" balancer.
|
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Judge273, I just noticed in looking at the photos you posted that your entire casting number was ground off and hand stamped. It looks like your block was cast in April of 1969. My block was cast shortly after yours and the first three digits of the casting number is as cast but the last four digits were ground off and restamped. Guess there was little repeatability to this practice.
|
Reply |
|
|