Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2020, 05:41 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

I will go back first of the week to see what else Mike finds.Tom

  #2  
Old 09-18-2020, 06:02 PM
KEN CROCIE KEN CROCIE is offline
Pontiac Performance Author
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Rancho Cucamonga Ca.
Posts: 1,600
Default

What about my favorite, #4 ?

__________________
GOOD IDEAS ARE OFTEN FOUND ABANDONED IN THE DUST OF PROCRASTINATION
  #3  
Old 09-19-2020, 12:33 AM
wbnapier wbnapier is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 592
Default

The bearings were Clevite Performance, either P or H. My invoice doesn't say which, I can't remember. Both the machinist and Tom are very confident in the diagnosis.

I see damage to the block in one of Tom's photos (attached and circled in red).

Curious what you all think of the block damage and the blocks future prospects.

The spark plug thing is a mystery.

There wasn't a drop of oil leaking. 6.5+ quarts in the engine.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Damage 4.5.jpg
Views:	430
Size:	68.4 KB
ID:	549881  

__________________
1965 Pontiac GTO
455/469 w/ #48 Heads, '65 Tri-Power
9.25:1 CR
Stump Puller Cam
Muncie M22W 1st-2.56 2nd-1.75 3rd-1.37 4th-1.00
3.55 Rear Differential
Front: 225/60R15 Height: 25.6"
Rear: 275/60R15 Height: 28"
  #4  
Old 09-28-2020, 10:30 PM
wbnapier wbnapier is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 592
Default

The Clevite / Mahle are advertised as narrow on one side for large fillet radius:

https://catalog.mahle-aftermarket.co...52599445131138

__________________
1965 Pontiac GTO
455/469 w/ #48 Heads, '65 Tri-Power
9.25:1 CR
Stump Puller Cam
Muncie M22W 1st-2.56 2nd-1.75 3rd-1.37 4th-1.00
3.55 Rear Differential
Front: 225/60R15 Height: 25.6"
Rear: 275/60R15 Height: 28"
  #5  
Old 09-18-2020, 06:10 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Ken,the bearing looks fine,did not take a close look at the F&R thrust side of it,will take a look next week.The only bearing that looked bad was the rear main.Tom

  #6  
Old 09-18-2020, 06:13 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

Thrust bearing
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	B1DD23B2-FA99-404B-8840-5A824A247C51.jpg
Views:	423
Size:	78.9 KB
ID:	549853   Click image for larger version

Name:	0CB56F1B-228D-4459-90B9-916A94E7235A.jpg
Views:	443
Size:	47.2 KB
ID:	549852  

  #7  
Old 09-19-2020, 10:47 AM
MarkS57's Avatar
MarkS57 MarkS57 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 612
Default

Just a thought, were the bearings supplied by Butler with the rotating assembly? If it is a journal radius issue wouldn't some culpability belong to Butler?

For the spark plugs, is it possible the center electrode broke inside the insulators and dropped down to close the gap? Crazier things have happened.

__________________

65 Tempest, 400, TH400
86 Fiero SE 2.8
  #8  
Old 09-19-2020, 11:00 AM
wbnapier wbnapier is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkS57 View Post
Just a thought, were the bearings supplied by Butler with the rotating assembly? If it is a journal radius issue wouldn't some culpability belong to Butler?

For the spark plugs, is it possible the center electrode broke inside the insulators and dropped down to close the gap? Crazier things have happened.
Yes, the bearings were part of the kit I purchased from Butler. I will try to speak with them Monday, but I'm waiting on more info from the machinist. He's going to do some measurements with different bearings, stock crank, etc..

In my opinion, they should sell the kit with a narrow bearing or reduced radius (fillet). The customer should have no need to machine the crank for this. At the least, send a note with the kit that this needs to be checked.

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if this is either a manufacturing defect by Scat or Clevite. I doubt Butler would even check something like this on their own builds,

This cannot be a normal thing, otherwise garage hobbyists are doomed. If a hobbyist needs to go to this level of inspection detail on semi-finished parts, it becomes an unworkable project for most of us.

Moving forward, I would caution anyone against purchasing their own parts and doing this. Let your machinist prepping your block purchase the parts and have responsibility for them.

__________________
1965 Pontiac GTO
455/469 w/ #48 Heads, '65 Tri-Power
9.25:1 CR
Stump Puller Cam
Muncie M22W 1st-2.56 2nd-1.75 3rd-1.37 4th-1.00
3.55 Rear Differential
Front: 225/60R15 Height: 25.6"
Rear: 275/60R15 Height: 28"
  #9  
Old 09-19-2020, 11:49 AM
Ben M.'s Avatar
Ben M. Ben M. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wbnapier View Post
Moving forward, I would caution anyone against purchasing their own parts and doing this. Let your machinist prepping your block purchase the parts and have responsibility for them.
This is the route I've taken on engines\transmissions lately. Most reputable shops have no problem warrantying their work if they supplied the parts, but once you introduce something of yours that they didn't supply, they get very skittish about it. I have had conversations with machinists at their shops on a friendly basis and they have given me the picture that if it's something they bought, they have recourse going after their supplier who they usually have a relationship with. If it's something some rando sold on craigslist or eBay and brought to the shop, they have next to no recourse other than pissing off the customer by telling them it isn't their fault or eating it.

I can't physically do the work on these big engines anymore so if I am doing something it needs to be done right the first time and if I'm pulling an engine, it better not be because I screwed up. Machining\manufacturing defects are not unheard of, even with quality vendors and suppliers. If we need a near clean-room environment to assemble an engine, that's going to put a hardship on a lot of people who don't have access to that kind of resource.

  #10  
Old 09-19-2020, 12:32 PM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 22,515
Default

Quote:
None at all,the block was line honed after they and the ARP bolts were put in.Pretty sure its something to do with the radius on the aftermarket crank and the bearing.Tom
Check the main cap dimensions especially where that little 'sliver' of the cap is.
I had a block honed, looked great, fitted mains, dropped in crank.
Tightened each cap and checked the rotation torque. Excellent. Until I got to the last (rear) cap.
It would not budge!
I checked the clearances again, perfect. Except I never checked that little piece on back of the cap.


When honed, the operator did not run the hone all the way through the cap/block. Did the wide part, thought the bearing didn't go all the way to the end of the cap. (thought they were seal grooves?)



__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!

W.E.C moment


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
  #11  
Old 09-19-2020, 05:43 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Myers, Fl.
Posts: 9,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben M. View Post
This is the route I've taken on engines\transmissions lately. Most reputable shops have no problem warrantying their work if they supplied the parts, but once you introduce something of yours that they didn't supply, they get very skittish about it. I have had conversations with machinists at their shops on a friendly basis and they have given me the picture that if it's something they bought, they have recourse going after their supplier who they usually have a relationship with. If it's something some rando sold on craigslist or eBay and brought to the shop, they have next to no recourse other than pissing off the customer by telling them it isn't their fault or eating it.

I can't physically do the work on these big engines anymore so if I am doing something it needs to be done right the first time and if I'm pulling an engine, it better not be because I screwed up. Machining\manufacturing defects are not unheard of, even with quality vendors and suppliers. If we need a near clean-room environment to assemble an engine, that's going to put a hardship on a lot of people who don't have access to that kind of resource.

While I completely understand this message. I think most of us buy these parts as time and money permits because of the cost.



Is it better to to save the money, don't buy the parts and plop it down to a builder?

  #12  
Old 09-19-2020, 12:58 PM
pastry_chef's Avatar
pastry_chef pastry_chef is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wbnapier View Post
This cannot be a normal thing, otherwise garage hobbyists are doomed. If a hobbyist needs to go to this level of inspection detail on semi-finished parts, it becomes an unworkable project for most of us.
And most "engine builders" as well.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CEzMqmjnCEc/

  #13  
Old 09-19-2020, 08:18 PM
mchell's Avatar
mchell mchell is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Port, FL
Posts: 2,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wbnapier View Post
Yes, the bearings were part of the kit I purchased from Butler. I will try to speak with them Monday, but I'm waiting on more info from the machinist. He's going to do some measurements with different bearings, stock crank, etc..

In my opinion, they should sell the kit with a narrow bearing or reduced radius (fillet). The customer should have no need to machine the crank for this. At the least, send a note with the kit that this needs to be checked.

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if this is either a manufacturing defect by Scat or Clevite. I doubt Butler would even check something like this on their own builds,

This cannot be a normal thing, otherwise garage hobbyists are doomed. If a hobbyist needs to go to this level of inspection detail on semi-finished parts, it becomes an unworkable project for most of us.

Moving forward, I would caution anyone against purchasing their own parts and doing this. Let your machinist prepping your block purchase the parts and have responsibility for them.
Unfortunately, there are No guarantees no matter how you play it....

Just because a builder supplies the parts, builds it and you blow it up a day later later doesn’t guarantee squat. Too many variables.

I like to run em on the Dyno before install. Much easer to repair a problem found on the dyno. At least I have a chance at knowing it Might hold together AFTER I install it.

How long it will run after install is still a crap shoot on even a moderately built Pontiac. I drive em hard....

__________________
71 GTO, 463, KRE 295 cfm heads ported by SD Performance, RPM intake, Qjet, Dougs Headers, Comp cams HR 246/252 ...11 to 1 , 3.55 cogs, 3985lbs.....day three- 11.04 at 120mph ....1.53 60', 6.98 1/8 mile
  #14  
Old 09-29-2020, 02:43 PM
STEELCITYFIREBIRD's Avatar
STEELCITYFIREBIRD STEELCITYFIREBIRD is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: "STEELER COUNTRY"
Posts: 2,965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wbnapier View Post
Yes, the bearings were part of the kit I purchased from Butler. I will try to speak with them Monday, but I'm waiting on more info from the machinist. He's going to do some measurements with different bearings, stock crank, etc..

In my opinion, they should sell the kit with a narrow bearing or reduced radius (fillet). The customer should have no need to machine the crank for this. At the least, send a note with the kit that this needs to be checked.

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if this is either a manufacturing defect by Scat or Clevite. I doubt Butler would even check something like this on their own builds,

This cannot be a normal thing, otherwise garage hobbyists are doomed. If a hobbyist needs to go to this level of inspection detail on semi-finished parts, it becomes an unworkable project for most of us.

Moving forward, I would caution anyone against purchasing their own parts and doing this. Let your machinist prepping your block purchase the parts and have responsibility for them.
Excellent advice, I often told customers “Would you bring your own steaks to a restaurant then complain if they don’t taste good., make you sick or kill you”

IF we took the job , it was made clear, in writing...no warranty.
I would offer to match their “Summit Racing” pricing.

  #15  
Old 09-18-2020, 07:47 PM
mchell's Avatar
mchell mchell is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Port, FL
Posts: 2,567
Default

Those dowel pins have anything to do with the failure?

__________________
71 GTO, 463, KRE 295 cfm heads ported by SD Performance, RPM intake, Qjet, Dougs Headers, Comp cams HR 246/252 ...11 to 1 , 3.55 cogs, 3985lbs.....day three- 11.04 at 120mph ....1.53 60', 6.98 1/8 mile
  #16  
Old 09-18-2020, 07:53 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

None at all,the block was line honed after they and the ARP bolts were put in.Pretty sure its something to do with the radius on the aftermarket crank and the bearing.Tom

  #17  
Old 09-18-2020, 08:07 PM
mchell's Avatar
mchell mchell is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Port, FL
Posts: 2,567
Default

Weird.... So you’re thinking it’s a manufacturing flaw? Those scat rotating assemblies are usually darn nice.

__________________
71 GTO, 463, KRE 295 cfm heads ported by SD Performance, RPM intake, Qjet, Dougs Headers, Comp cams HR 246/252 ...11 to 1 , 3.55 cogs, 3985lbs.....day three- 11.04 at 120mph ....1.53 60', 6.98 1/8 mile
  #18  
Old 09-18-2020, 08:33 PM
Mike Davis's Avatar
Mike Davis Mike Davis is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,055
Default

What was the mfg of the bearings? I had a two sets of Clevite bearings here last year and one set was almost .018 wider than the other. I started checking all of them I install now and also radius the sides of all the bearings with a hand debur tool.

__________________
65 GTO, Tiger Gold, Nostalgia Super Stock 421, 2-Carter AFB carbs, Stock Suspension, 3550lbs Full Exhaust-- 9.70's@135

66 GTO (Retired race car)
421 CID
Multiple NSCA/NMCA World Champion

66 GTO 389 3x2, 4 speed, 3.90 gear, Montero Red 33K original Miles
67 GTO 2dr Post, 428, Tri Power, 3.55 Gears
80 Trans Am Black SE Y84 W72 WS6

Last edited by Mike Davis; 09-18-2020 at 09:05 PM.
  #19  
Old 09-19-2020, 01:57 AM
wbnapier wbnapier is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Davis View Post
What was the mfg of the bearings? I had a two sets of Clevite bearings here last year and one set was almost .018 wider than the other. I started checking all of them I install now and also radius the sides of all the bearings with a hand debur tool.
Clevite also. You are more observant than me. Smart move.

__________________
1965 Pontiac GTO
455/469 w/ #48 Heads, '65 Tri-Power
9.25:1 CR
Stump Puller Cam
Muncie M22W 1st-2.56 2nd-1.75 3rd-1.37 4th-1.00
3.55 Rear Differential
Front: 225/60R15 Height: 25.6"
Rear: 275/60R15 Height: 28"
  #20  
Old 09-18-2020, 09:15 PM
Formulas's Avatar
Formulas Formulas is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wrecking Havoc In The Matrix
Posts: 3,333
Default

Was the rear seal already taken out before the pic?
Or a camera shadow thing?

The heat also seems to be quite a bit forward of the slinger radius enough to turn blue in the oil groove. Seems if it was as simple as bearing riding slinger radius it would clearance itself quickly on break in then cool and would also affect end play on assy

I once burned a rear main bearing I suspected it was from a -8 oil line ( to small ) to cooler / filter on a long high speed run went to -10
15 years before interweb

.

__________________
........... The More You Follow The Herd The Less You Can Be In The Lead ..........

Last edited by Formulas; 09-18-2020 at 09:26 PM.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017