FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Does anyone have direct experience using drag radials verses slicks? I'm thinking about using BFG 345/55R15 (12 width x 29.9 ht.) instead of 12-14 in. width slicks in a 10 second street car. I'm curious as to how much e.t. will be lost.
__________________
There is no such thing as too much cam, just not enough engine. 1966 GTO - 11.31@119 (3478 lbs) in 1979 1967 Firebird - 9.73@138 (2940 lbs) in 1986 400 cu in / 295-298 cfm RAIV / Lunati Cam 278/283 - .704 lift/5.13 gears |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Does anyone have direct experience using drag radials verses slicks? I'm thinking about using BFG 345/55R15 (12 width x 29.9 ht.) instead of 12-14 in. width slicks in a 10 second street car. I'm curious as to how much e.t. will be lost.
__________________
There is no such thing as too much cam, just not enough engine. 1966 GTO - 11.31@119 (3478 lbs) in 1979 1967 Firebird - 9.73@138 (2940 lbs) in 1986 400 cu in / 295-298 cfm RAIV / Lunati Cam 278/283 - .704 lift/5.13 gears |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
You'll have an 11 second car with DR's if no other changes are made.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
It all depends on your combo. If you are set up for a "hard" hit off the line you will/can spin the Drag radials.
Pontiac Dude running a 3500 converter has run 1.4 60 ft's and as quick as 9.44 with 295/65 DR's. (10in wide, 29.9 tall) The 12 wide DR's would even be better, but there are some tips to making them work best. |
Reply |
|
|