FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1960 2V vs 4V cam the same?
Anyone know offhand if the 1960 hi-compression 2V cam (283 HP) is the same as the 1960 std 4V cam (303 HP)? I was under the impression they were the same.
Thx in advance for any info / feedback. Randy A. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
According to Pete McCarthy's book both engines used a '472' cam.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thx much for the info, Stuart!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Stewart already knows this, but the base Tri-Power engine of 318hp uses the 472 cam too. After 1964 the standard HydraMatic 389 2bbl was the same 290hp for Catalina and StarChief and uses the 066 cam which is exactly the same profile as the 472. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thx for the info U47. The other post about upgrading the 64 Cat got me to wondering if I was wrong all this time. I have all the original parts to upgrade my 60 Ventura to a 4V setup but don't really want to go to a cam change if I ever get around to the swap. Even tho my car is a 4 dr hardtop, it has the 3.08 Safety-Trak which I guess is standard according to your comments.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No problem leaving in the 472 cam and as I said before the 472 cam is used in the 318 hp Tri-Power engine as well ...if you wanted to use that.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
Reply |
|
|