#1  
Old 04-11-2022, 08:59 PM
RayW RayW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wyomissing, PA USA
Posts: 27
Default Parallel flow condensers any better than what Ames sells?

1971 LEMans. Are the parallel flow condensers that Original Air sells much better than stock? It’s about a $60 difference in the cost. The original condenser looks like a parallel flow— what’s the difference between a OA “parallel” flow and stock. Thanks.

  #2  
Old 04-12-2022, 12:56 PM
tjs72lemans tjs72lemans is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Winona, MN
Posts: 1,157
Default

I wasn't aware they made parallel flow condensers back in the early 70's. I thought this was a newer design. Not sure what they called the old ones. I do have Old Air's new style now though.

  #3  
Old 04-12-2022, 04:23 PM
hgerhardt's Avatar
hgerhardt hgerhardt is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 654
Default

PF (parallel flow) condensers are a fairly new thing, like in the last 25 years or so.

The original condensers are round-tube serpentine flow; so, yes, the tubes are parallel to each other, but that's not how the flowpath works.

PF condensers route refrigerant through multiple flat tubes at once, hence the PF name. But the main benefit of PF is the hugely bigger surface area of the flat tubes with microchannels allowing much more heat transfer than round tube units. This is more important for R-134a than R-12, which liberates heat better than 134a.

So, if you're going to use R-12 in your car, then the original round-tube unit will work fine, but the PF will still work better. If going with R-134a, then get a PF for sure.

Also remember that if using either/both R-134a and PF condensers, you need significantly less refrigerant than the OEM amount of R-12.

The Following User Says Thank You to hgerhardt For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 04-12-2022, 06:38 PM
FrankieT/A's Avatar
FrankieT/A FrankieT/A is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 2,556
Default

As H said, the parallel condensers didn't come out until 134A was implemented.

You can tell a parallel condenser by the common tube running up the side. All cross tubes intersect with this tube.

A series condenser is one continuous tube from end to end. In my 71 T/A I have run 123A since 2002, first with the original condenser and then with a parallel. The parallel has more fins per inch by a big margin and I saw absolutely no appreciable difference in performance between the two. Both were ice cold.

__________________
1978 Black & Gold T/A [complete 70 Ram Air III (carb to pan) PQ and 12 bolt], fully loaded, deluxe, WS6, T-Top car - 1972 Formula 455HO Ram Air numbers matching Julep Green - 1971 T/A 455, 320 CFM Eheads, RP cam, Doug's headers, Fuel injection, TKX 5 Spd. 12 Bolt 3.73, 4 wheel disc. All A/C cars
  #5  
Old 04-12-2022, 08:24 PM
RayW RayW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wyomissing, PA USA
Posts: 27
Default

Thanks everyone, great information!

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017