[Hammertime Mike]

Some more attachments.

[Money Pit]

I like the cat! Nothing like taken care of yourself....LOL

[Hammertime Mike]

Originally Posted by Money Pit

I like the cat! Nothing like taken care of yourself....LOL

Just seeing if anybody is paying attention!!Good eyes that's a blurry photo.

[Money Pit]

Originally Posted by Hammertime Mike

Just seeing if anybody is paying attention!!Good eyes that's a blurry photo.

Mike, I had to look at a couple of times to figure out what the hell it was! lmao...

Jeff

[65madgoat]

Looking to further expand on this comment: "Note: One thing to understand is that the NW flange is centered on the ports making it balanced. The T2 the flange is offset to the rear making the runner appear shorter compared to it's front runners. **The offset to the rear is approximately 1.0625 off center**"

I just noticed this on my NW intake as I was going to try and use it with the 1969 Trans Am Ram Air IV pans. Had a T2 previously and noticed the fitment difference on that intake is offset some versus a stock intake - fit was ok with the ram air pans - but definitely not where a stock intake would put a carb relative to the hood's ram air pan air filter hole.

So wondering if anyone has offset numbers on different intake manifolds like the comparison noted above on the NW vs T2 - like what a stock Pontiac intake flange offset is compared to other commonly used aftermarket 4bbl intake manifolds etc.

Thanks a bunch.