Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2021, 11:36 AM
Terry M. Hunt Terry M. Hunt is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Way over yonder
Posts: 908
Default 3.08 rear gear with wide ratio 4 speed

Converted my 66 GTO from auto to 4 speed and still have the 3.08 rear axle in place. Anybody else running this combination and what are the pros and cons?

__________________
Terry Hunt
"He'd need 5 years in the fifth grade just to get an idiot certificate" Smokey Yunick re: Bill France Jr.
  #2  
Old 06-26-2021, 11:41 AM
padgett's Avatar
padgett padgett is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 467
Default

Pro: MPG (but really need a 2.56 with a M20 to get 2000 rpm at 70).
Con: Frequent clutch replacement

Back in the day, there was a Saginaw 4 speed with a 3.31 first gear but kinda marginal on torque.

__________________
Orlando - Where rust must be imported.
Web Site


  #3  
Old 06-26-2021, 01:44 PM
bdk1976 bdk1976 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 713
Default

Have you driven your car? Why don’t you tell us?

  #4  
Old 06-26-2021, 02:21 PM
PontiacJim1959 PontiacJim1959 is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Gastonia, NC
Posts: 492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry M. Hunt View Post
Converted my 66 GTO from auto to 4 speed and still have the 3.08 rear axle in place. Anybody else running this combination and what are the pros and cons?
Bad combo. Factory tires were 26" and often newer tire can be taller, effectively dropping that 3.08 down into upper 2's.

Taking off will require a lot more than normal clutch slipping to get rolling, especially on a stop at a grade or steep hill. So you can expect premature clutch wear and replacement - and maybe some embarassment when you stall the car on a steep hill.

Most wide ratio manual trans cars from the factory will run a 3.23 and up with 26" tires. It is doable, and I have not knowing much about cars in my youth, but I also was replacing clutch discs about every 3 months with the way I drive - and I figured I was just buying NAPA brand discs that were junk. Now I realize it may have been the rear swap from the close ratio M21/3.90's to 3.08's.

  #5  
Old 06-26-2021, 03:57 PM
The Champ's Avatar
The Champ The Champ is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 2,536
Default

I switched from 3.42 gears to 3.08's in the 12 bolt in my '64 GTO with the original M20. Effective 1st gear is nearly 7.88 - very similar to how it left the factory with the original 3.23 gears which had an effective 1st gear of 8.26. I drove the car with 27" tires for 20 years with 3.23, 3.36, 3.42 and 3.08 gears..

Original factory tires for a '66 GTO were actually a little over 27".

https://www.cokertire.com/tires/750-...8-redline.html

It works fine and RPM's at 70 MPH is about 2700.

  #6  
Old 06-26-2021, 06:58 PM
Terry M. Hunt Terry M. Hunt is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Way over yonder
Posts: 908
Default 3.08 rear gear with wide ratio 4 speed

I did the swap years ago and barely drove the car before sticking it in storage so I don’t recall how it drove. I noticed in the Restoration Guide on pages 310 and 311 charts showing all the rear gear/transmission combinations offered in 1966. For cars with standard brakes, a 3.08 ratio was only available with auto trans and A/C. For cars with metallic brakes, a 3.08 ratio was available with a 3 speed, a 4 speed, or an automatic with or without A/C. The chart does not seem to specify whether the 4 speed was a close ratio or a wide ratio. If this combo was so hard on clutches, it seems surprising that it would be offered by the factory. Maybe I’m missing something.

__________________
Terry Hunt
"He'd need 5 years in the fifth grade just to get an idiot certificate" Smokey Yunick re: Bill France Jr.
  #7  
Old 06-26-2021, 07:10 PM
Goatracer1 Goatracer1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NH
Posts: 3,792
Default

A friend of mine ran a 3.08/ 4 speed in a 1972 Ventura 2 which should be close in weight to your car with no problem. Give it a try.

  #8  
Old 06-26-2021, 08:34 PM
bdk1976 bdk1976 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry M. Hunt View Post
I did the swap years ago and barely drove the car before sticking it in storage so I don’t recall how it drove. I noticed in the Restoration Guide on pages 310 and 311 charts showing all the rear gear/transmission combinations offered in 1966. For cars with standard brakes, a 3.08 ratio was only available with auto trans and A/C. For cars with metallic brakes, a 3.08 ratio was available with a 3 speed, a 4 speed, or an automatic with or without A/C. The chart does not seem to specify whether the 4 speed was a close ratio or a wide ratio. If this combo was so hard on clutches, it seems surprising that it would be offered by the factory. Maybe I’m missing something.
The wide ratio Muncie (M20) went with 3.08. I have a '65 GTO that is an original M20/3.08STT. I have NOT driven my car as it is third in line for resto. I expect to have enough torque with my engine to make it a moot point, and being able to wind it out to like 50mph(?) or something crazy in first gear is kind of cool...lol

  #9  
Old 06-27-2021, 09:38 AM
GoGoat GoGoat is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 372
Default

My 66 stock tripower/ 4 speed had high 2's when I got it. Hardly got out of 2 nd gear in town. Had to shift to 1st at corners. Went to 355's. Much better. All depends on driver needs, type of use, terrane. and future uses. Good luck.

  #10  
Old 06-28-2021, 10:47 AM
The Champ's Avatar
The Champ The Champ is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 2,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry M. Hunt View Post
If this combo was so hard on clutches, it seems surprising that it would be offered by the factory. Maybe I’m missing something.
You're not missing anything.

With the wide ratio M20, a 3.08 rear gear is perfectly fine for regular driving. It may not be the preferred rear end for doing burnouts or the drag strip, but I don't think that's your objective.

  #11  
Old 07-03-2021, 03:31 PM
geeteeohguy's Avatar
geeteeohguy geeteeohguy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 5,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Champ View Post
You're not missing anything.

With the wide ratio M20, a 3.08 rear gear is perfectly fine for regular driving. It may not be the preferred rear end for doing burnouts or the drag strip, but I don't think that's your objective.
Agree. This was a factory option and wasn't an issue back then and isn't now. These cars have plenty of low end torque to make it easy to start out with an M20 and the 3.08. Not even an issue. BTDT.

__________________
Jeff
  #12  
Old 08-23-2021, 05:29 PM
JLuger's Avatar
JLuger JLuger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ma
Posts: 74
Default 2.73's

I'm running a M20 2.73's with a trutrac stock 455, 235/60/15's in my 66 Goat
From everything I read thought for sure I'd have chatter, Nope.. you can roll the clutch right out I drive the car all the time and everywhere its not a burn out machine but is a great all around driver.

  #13  
Old 08-24-2021, 01:10 PM
geeteeohguy's Avatar
geeteeohguy geeteeohguy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 5,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLuger View Post
I'm running a M20 2.73's with a trutrac stock 455, 235/60/15's in my 66 Goat
From everything I read thought for sure I'd have chatter, Nope.. you can roll the clutch right out I drive the car all the time and everywhere its not a burn out machine but is a great all around driver.
Not a burn out machine, but I'll be you enjoy cruising 80 mph, sipping fuel, and running cool. Instead of buzzing along with a hot engine at 60 mph in the slow lane getting passed by garbage trucks, but being cool because you have a 4.11 rear end!

__________________
Jeff
  #14  
Old 08-24-2021, 03:29 PM
JLuger's Avatar
JLuger JLuger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ma
Posts: 74
Default

You know I never thought about that contributing to the low temps the car runs 180 on a 90° day might see 200° If I drive it hard that’s with stock factory cooling setup and factory exhaust with resonators if you can believe it.

  #15  
Old 08-24-2021, 07:09 PM
gtorich gtorich is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: oshkosh, Wi
Posts: 1,790
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geeteeohguy View Post
Not a burn out machine, but I'll be you enjoy cruising 80 mph, sipping fuel, and running cool. Instead of buzzing along with a hot engine at 60 mph in the slow lane getting passed by garbage trucks, but being cool because you have a 4.11 rear end!
That was funny............i ran a 455 with a M-20 ...3.08 for about 10 yrs, no issues, switched to a 3.42 rear, ran good, but not really all that much difference for the money spent.

Rich

  #16  
Old 08-24-2021, 07:52 PM
JLuger's Avatar
JLuger JLuger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ma
Posts: 74
Default

I was going to find a set of 308 gears for it and I had another 10 bolt with 3.55’s I had ran in another Gto this car came with a 8.5 10 bolt and the 2.73 gears where like new so I gave them a try.

  #17  
Old 08-24-2021, 07:52 PM
bhill86's Avatar
bhill86 bhill86 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 529
Default

I converted my 77 T/A from auto to a ST10 with a 2.41 rear. That was less than ideal. Realistically I should’ve looked into a Richmond 4+1 but instead I swapped to a 3.08. Way more practical than the 2.41/4 speed setup. Still highway friendly but not a dog either. I also don’t feel like it’s overly hard on the clutch to get rolling. The 2.41 though did feel that way.

  #18  
Old 08-24-2021, 08:22 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,792
Default

I have run the ST-10 3.42 first gear trans in a few diff cars.Now in a 62 GP with 421HO and 2.68s in the back.Great combo for driving,would not try to beat on it with big sticky tires.Tom

  #19  
Old 08-25-2021, 07:35 AM
Andre's Avatar
Andre Andre is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hobe Sound (Tiger Land), Fl
Posts: 4,731
Default

The beauty of the Pontiac V8 is that it has more than enough low end torque so that gears like 2.56:1 will still burn the tires. Case in point being my old 1964 conv clone with stock never taken apart 389 and 2 speed auto with 2.56 rear and 14" tires. It would smoke these tires with no effort, yet ran cool as a cucumber (just at 180) at 2000 rpm at 60mph. I think the new owner loves it more than I did.

  #20  
Old 08-25-2021, 10:34 AM
scott06 scott06 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry M. Hunt View Post
Converted my 66 GTO from auto to 4 speed and still have the 3.08 rear axle in place. Anybody else running this combination and what are the pros and cons?
I just swapped 4.33's for 3.08s in my 65 gto with a 4 spd.

The answer depends on what you want to do with the car.

I just want a cruiser so it works great and keeps highway rpm down. if you want something snappier try a 3.55 or 3.73. I've had other cars with a 1:1 4th gear and 3.55 they are pretty good at highway speed

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017