Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-13-2023, 10:13 AM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Vineland,N.J.
Posts: 1,521
Default Picking a carb?

I just got done building a very mild 400 for the street car, Headers and rpm intake,, 2801 cam, 8.8 comp and OD trans. It's just a cruiser.. Plan to taking it on road trips so milage is a concern. Right now I have a 750 holley vac secondary on it and runs really good. Just wondering If a smaller carb would be better, Thinking of a 600 holley or I have a 77 quadrajet laying around that needs rebuilding.
Do you think a 600 holley would be to small? Is a 77 quadrajet any good?

  #2  
Old 05-13-2023, 10:46 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,752
Default

Nothing wrong with a 600 as they can support close to 400 Hp so it would not be. Restriction for your motor and it’s a bolt on with that intake.

If you want the best drivability under 4500 rpm I would try and sell the RPM and pick up a used Performer and then rebuild your Q-jet to use on it.

I ran a set up like that with my 79 TA for years and a with a Isky 270 mega cam it ran great and if I was to redo a car like that for everyday use I would do the exact same thing all over again.

You did not mention what body type this was in, but if it is in a TA I can tell you that opening up the rear of the hood scope is worth 5 Hp and nice added music to your ears at full throttle.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #3  
Old 05-13-2023, 01:14 PM
i82much's Avatar
i82much i82much is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,793
Default

i dunno man. a 3310 ought to be just fine. i think you are gonna need a decade to save the cost of another carb in fuel expenses ... just dial in your 750 and enjoy.

  #4  
Old 05-13-2023, 06:50 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,796
Default

use what you have.Tom

  #5  
Old 05-13-2023, 07:15 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 16,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
use what you have.Tom
Agree 100%. Use the 1977 Quadrajet you already have.

The 1977 Quadrajet is one of the best ones, the casting quality is superior to earlier versions and it’s easier to tune as well as being an 800 cfm capable unit. I’d run that for a fuel economy road trip engine any day over a Holley.

With that said a 600 Holley is more than adequate, but I’d rebuild the Quadrajet with jetting advice from one of the forum Quadrajet gurus like Cliff R or Jeff (shaker455).

A Quadrajet is a fuel economy and performance carb all rolled into one, a Holley is just a performance carb in my opinion. Since you already have the carb you’re just a carb kit, an afternoon and a few jets and metering rods away from nirvana.

Just make sure the huge secondary throttle blades are not contacting the edges of the secondary openings on your RPM intake, a common issue.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
  #6  
Old 05-13-2023, 07:53 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Street Car, hard to beat a 1977 Q-Jet if dialed in properly.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Vaught For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 05-13-2023, 08:03 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,796
Default

I was speaking of the 3310 that on the car!Tom

  #8  
Old 05-13-2023, 08:51 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 16,460
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
I was speaking of the 3310 that on the car!Tom
I knew that.

See what I did?

That’s what you get for posting just one short sentence.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
  #9  
Old 05-13-2023, 09:20 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 5,904
Default

Count me firmly in the Q-jet category.

HOWEVER, the common mistake I see folks making with Holleys--because they read the magazines, or see the time-limited dyno tuning video on youtube--is that they change the JETS to make the fuel curve right at WFO.

This works on the dyno. It's stupid for a street-driven car in real life .

The JETS are intended to be the part-throttle, high-vacuum "cruise" fuel metering. They should not be overly rich, maybe even a little lean. When the gas pedal is on the carpet, the POWER VALVE CHANNEL RESTRICTIONS should be adding the extra fuel, not the jets.

As a result of poor tuning of the Holley, the main jets are too big, and the PVCR aren't big enough. Cruise fuel economy suffers, tailpipe emission suffers...but it runs good for the 1% of the time the throttle is WFO, or when it's run on the dyno by folks who don't have time to drill the PVCR so they "cheat" on the jetting.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Schurkey For This Useful Post:
  #10  
Old 05-13-2023, 11:12 PM
i82much's Avatar
i82much i82much is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,793
Default

the avs2 edelbrock annular carbs get great reviews. i might try the 800 avs2 in place of my 850 double pumper one day just for the helluvit.

  #11  
Old 05-14-2023, 12:09 AM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,595
Default

It won't take much to try that 600 Holley. BUT I'd want that 77 Quadrajet on my engine!!! I look at sw a pmeets for 77 and 78 Quadrajunks, every chance I get. I usually get them cheap, because of the front inlet tells the world its not for a Chevy!!!

Cliff has parts that most don't sell, and some of those parts come in his deluxe kit.

All Quadrajets need the primary throttle shaft bores bushed. Cliff sells kit for that. A 77 Quadrajet has a hot air choke. Cliff sells a kit to convert that to electric, and you will need that with a Performer intake.

Cliff has custom primary metering rods made that help with fine tuning. No one else has these?

Cliff can sell you ALL the parts you need for an initial installed flawless tune. If you buy his parts, you get any needed tech help needed, after the sale.

My thought on the Performer intake is to leave it on. The smaller runners provide possibly better port velocity than the RPM and likely the good stock iron units.

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
The Following User Says Thank You to 77 TRASHCAN For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 05-14-2023, 01:27 AM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 16,460
Default

Mike already has the RPM intake installed that he wants to use, however I agree that the regular Performer would be a better choice for a moderate 400 build aiming for a balance between performance and fuel efficiency on road trips.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
The Following User Says Thank You to b-man For This Useful Post:
  #13  
Old 05-14-2023, 02:32 AM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,335
Default

I good Q Jet is going to the best thing for this engine.
That said a 3310 is not a bad choice either.As efficient ? No, but they are easily tunable.

  #14  
Old 05-14-2023, 04:29 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,000
Default

Since mileage is a concern the 1977 Pontiac Q-jet is about as good as it gets. They convert easily to e-choke, plenty of cfm (850), APT for full control of the part throttle A/F ratio, and dead solid reliable in long term service with the right parts in it I used a 17057274 on my last 5 engines and it was flawless for decades. Instant starts in any weather, fast idle for warm-up, and perfect fit as well. Over the years I tested everything out there against that carb and nothing would outrun it on the dyno or at the track and it used a lot less fuel for "normal" driving.

It will need a little help being emission calibrated. I sell custom rebuild kits with tuning parts to set them up exactly for the application so it will be plug & play right off the bench.......

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cliff R For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old 05-14-2023, 09:05 AM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Vineland,N.J.
Posts: 1,521
Default

Thanks for all the info. I will probably try the quadrajet and see how it performs. Does anyone know if it has the attachment point for a 2004r TV cable?

The only reason I am using the RPM and Holley, is that's what I had on the 455 that was in the car. The old set up actually ran 11.70 at 3900lbs. But since I already have a race car wanted to build a nice cruiser.

  #16  
Old 05-14-2023, 02:19 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,476
Default

Slap the 600 Holley on while you build the 77 Q-JET and mate to a 68-70 iron manifold.

I tink you will enjoy the difference in carb/intake combos, in the most convincing way.

Knockoff 90123 intake gaskets on ebay, maybe amazon, so maybe 9098s too.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017