#1  
Old 11-05-2024, 12:14 PM
Hammered's Avatar
Hammered Hammered is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kettering Ohio
Posts: 1,435
Default How did they make it a Wide Track?

I am trying to understand what Pontiac did to make the 69-72 GP have a wider track width in the front. The A-body cars of the same era have 59" front track widths whereas the GP had a 62" track width. They share A-arms, spindles and rotors and from what I've found elsewhere online, the frames are the same width in the front. Finally, the wheels across the different platforms seem to have about the same offset. How did they do it?

Similarly, the '68-72 GTO has a 2" wider track in the front than all of the other A-bodies.

__________________
1967 Firebird Convertible Factory 400/4spd
Now 462/5spd Fuel Injected
http://1967firebird.atwebpages.com/
  #2  
Old 11-05-2024, 01:14 PM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,704
Default

Not sure what source you are referencing in regards to track widths. Can pull the front wheels off a GP & measure wheel mtg surface to wheel mtg surface. I measured three original wheels, a '69 14x7 IF, & both an 14x7 HC & a 14x6 HF for my T-37 Coupe & noted the same back space (4 7/16").

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.

Last edited by 'ol Pinion head; 11-05-2024 at 01:37 PM.
  #3  
Old 11-05-2024, 01:34 PM
Hammered's Avatar
Hammered Hammered is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kettering Ohio
Posts: 1,435
Default

Thanks for the quick response. Track width is the distance from the middle of one tire to the other and if the wheels have zero offset, then that measurement would equal the hub-to-hub distance. As you say, the GP frames don't position the wheels out any further and all else being equal, it seems the difference would be in the wheels. A wider wheel alone would not change the track width unless the offset was different. I have see offsets of 1/4" and 1/2" reported for factory rally wheels, but don't know which direction the offset is in. Even so, I don't see how Pontiac could achieve a 3" wider track with only wheels.

__________________
1967 Firebird Convertible Factory 400/4spd
Now 462/5spd Fuel Injected
http://1967firebird.atwebpages.com/
  #4  
Old 11-05-2024, 01:44 PM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,704
Default

Hammered, I'll measure both bodystyles. I've removed the front stub section from several GrandPrix frames & have a '71 GP partscar w the front clip & engine removed, it should be the easiest to measure if there was any widening in the center area of the front frame "stub". The front of the frame horns are def in the exact same spot.

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.
  #5  
Old 11-05-2024, 01:58 PM
Hammered's Avatar
Hammered Hammered is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kettering Ohio
Posts: 1,435
Default

Here are A-body GTO dimensions, but they are the same as a set I found for a Chevelle.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1970 Tempest GTO Frame Dimensions.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	86.3 KB
ID:	642389  

__________________
1967 Firebird Convertible Factory 400/4spd
Now 462/5spd Fuel Injected
http://1967firebird.atwebpages.com/
  #6  
Old 11-05-2024, 02:42 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 17,168
Default

If the ‘69 -‘72 GP frame was wider in the front or wherever (which it isn’t) the GP spindles wouldn’t interchange with A-body cars.

In order to have the correct Ackerman the steering arm length/angle would have to different from G to A-body to maintain the correct geometry for the wider frame.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
  #7  
Old 11-05-2024, 11:40 PM
Nobuddy Nobuddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 98
Default

I thought "wide track" was only engineering by the marketing department and advertising agency.

  #8  
Old 11-06-2024, 12:30 AM
mrennie's Avatar
mrennie mrennie is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cochrane, ON (we have polar bears)
Posts: 1,502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nobuddy View Post
I thought "wide track" was only engineering by the marketing department and advertising agency.
Me too. I thought it was more about the illustrations that stretched the look but which were not accurate.

__________________
Michael


1970 Oshawa built 1 option Judge. 24 year restoration/upgrade project finally finished!

1979 Trans Am - low-buck drag car project for when I retire
  #9  
Old 11-07-2024, 09:55 PM
Hammered's Avatar
Hammered Hammered is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kettering Ohio
Posts: 1,435
Default

From what (little) I've read, the original Wide Track cars, starting in 1959, had significantly wider track widths to improve handling. However, I am beginning to believe that in later years, it was a marketing slogan ostensibly backed by fudged numbers.

__________________
1967 Firebird Convertible Factory 400/4spd
Now 462/5spd Fuel Injected
http://1967firebird.atwebpages.com/
  #10  
Old 11-07-2024, 10:23 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 17,168
Default

Looking at the track of a 1959 Chevy (or Canadian Pontiac) compared to a 1959 Pontiac it’s easy to see the wider stance of the Wide Track Pontiac.

Surely in later years is was mostly a marketing slogan.

The 14x7” wheels that were standard on the GP for 1969 and not available on the Pontiac A-body which only had 14x6” wheels would qualify as a wide track feature in some sense.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
  #11  
Old 11-07-2024, 11:18 PM
besserspat besserspat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 225
Default

Im the later years it was through the wonderful magic of Marketing.... There was also no really tiger under the hood of a GTO...just sayin.

Peter

The Following User Says Thank You to besserspat For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 11-08-2024, 07:47 AM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 8,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammered View Post
From what (little) I've read, the original Wide Track cars, starting in 1959, had significantly wider track widths to improve handling. However, I am beginning to believe that in later years, it was a marketing slogan ostensibly backed by fudged numbers.
Not to improve handling, but to push the wheels out to match the larger body style (for aesthetics).

Bunkie Knudsen's comment was that, without doing that, the cars "looked like football players wearing ballet slippers".

https://disaffected-musings.com/2021...track-pontiac/

https://club.shannons.com.au/club/fo...track-pontiac/

K

__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.56 @ 139 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
"Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926

Last edited by Keith Seymore; 11-08-2024 at 07:55 AM.
  #13  
Old 11-08-2024, 09:37 AM
WQ59B WQ59B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 94
Default

Yes; starting in '59, the front & rear track were considerably wider than the other Divisions. My '59 Buick is 63/60, a '59 Pontiac is 64/64. Chevy was the narrowest. Wide-Track was a very real feature thruout the '60s. I cannot say without checking how it was in the '70s.

But the '70 sales brochure only lists a 1" difference in the GP & GTO, not 3 :
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-11-08 at 8.35.01 AM.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	48.6 KB
ID:	642528  

  #14  
Old 11-10-2024, 04:43 PM
Joe's Garage Joe's Garage is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Las Vega$, NV
Posts: 705
Default If the 'track' difference is only 1", here's a theory.

Since the 'track' measurement is from 'center of tire to center of tire' it's easily explainable.

The 1969-72 Grand Prix used 7" wide wheels. That's 1" wider than the 6" wheels on the same year GTO.

Most of that extra width is to the outside of the rim, so the tires moved outward.

I haven't gotten out a tape measure, but I'd speculate that the extra wheel width, which would move the tires themselves further apart, is how the track got wider.

The Following User Says Thank You to Joe's Garage For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017