Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-23-2016, 08:18 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,579
Default

I know ideally below the tank but my street 78 elective is not and runs high 10s with a stock pickup.
Fitting it so I did not think it would hit the rear pumpkin as it moved up and down and clear exhaust tailpipes and finding a flat spot on the trunk floor to bolt it to. It is on the driver's side with fuel lines running to passenger side-normal for a Chevy and the side a Holley takes anyways.

Tank has a sump and a pre filter to pump then a System 1 halfway under passenger seat on the carb side to regulator.

I heard the Mallorys can be mounted almost horizontal as they have some vent slots if they leak. The new Holley pumps mount sideways.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #62  
Old 12-24-2016, 10:30 AM
grandville455's Avatar
grandville455 grandville455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chippewa Falls,WI 54729
Posts: 10,839
Default

Yea I hear ya, Good thing for me is I have a cell so the pump doesn't have to hang so low like if i had a sump in stock tank etc. I think i remember reading that about mallory's also being ok to mount sideways.

__________________
Darby
74 Grandville 2Dr 455 c.i 4550#
2011 1.60 60 ft,7.33@94.55-11.502@117.74


2017, 74 firebird -3600 lbs (all bests) 1.33 60 ft, 6.314@108.39 9.950@134.32
M/T 275/60 ET SS Drag Radial

2023,(Pontiac 505) 1.27 60 ft, 5.97@112.86, 9.48@139.31.... 275/60 Radial Pro's
  #63  
Old 12-28-2016, 10:53 PM
vidguy's Avatar
vidguy vidguy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 3,822
Default

So I have a question. If the outlet of my sender is 1/4 NPT, does hooking that to an -8an (1/2") or larger line allow the fuel to flow to the ability of the larger line?

At what point does the minimum inside diameter of an orifice or tube matter? When does it restrict flow? At the "END" of the line, but not at the beginning?

Looking at Skips pictures. I have my Tanks Inc tank and sender with a 1/4 NPT fitting on both send and return.

I have started to set this up. On my Send I was going to use a 1/4 NPT to 3/8" barb fitting to 3/8 Twistloc line for the first 2 feet for flexibility, to the -8AN fitting on the rear end of the 1/2" stainless line going forward.

I considered using a 1/4 NPT to 1/2 barb and 1/2 TwistLoc line but I thought that if the fuel was coming out of a 1/4 fitting as long as all of the tubing after that was LARGER than 1/4", (the minimum restriction in the path) fuel would flow to the ability of the LARGEST tubing (the 1/2" inch) so whether the first 2 feet of line was 3/8" or 1/2" line after the initial 1/4" fitting, it would make no difference. Am I wrong?

On my RobbMc Regulator, in bypass mode, the fittings for fuel coming and going to the carburetor are 3/8" NPT. Why run a 1/2" line to it if the 3/8" will restrict flow?

Is the factor you are concerned about the length of the restriction? Where in the Robbmc, or my sender, the very short 3/8" or 1/4" passage has no real effect?

__________________
--
James

Work
'67 GTO Convertible "Koerner Built 413 500 hp with a Victor!.. I'll run a stock intake."
'75 Formula 400 - Daily Driver -
Running with my Home Built 455 and TH400

Details here:
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=588372
  #64  
Old 12-29-2016, 12:49 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vidguy View Post
So I have a question. If the outlet of my sender is 1/4 NPT, does hooking that to an -8an (1/2") or larger line allow the fuel to flow to the ability of the larger line?

At what point does the minimum inside diameter of an orifice or tube matter? When does it restrict flow? At the "END" of the line, but not at the beginning?

Looking at Skips pictures. I have my Tanks Inc tank and sender with a 1/4 NPT fitting on both send and return.

I have started to set this up. On my Send I was going to use a 1/4 NPT to 3/8" barb fitting to 3/8 Twistloc line for the first 2 feet for flexibility, to the -8AN fitting on the rear end of the 1/2" stainless line going forward.

I considered using a 1/4 NPT to 1/2 barb and 1/2 TwistLoc line but I thought that if the fuel was coming out of a 1/4 fitting as long as all of the tubing after that was LARGER than 1/4", (the minimum restriction in the path) fuel would flow to the ability of the LARGEST tubing (the 1/2" inch) so whether the first 2 feet of line was 3/8" or 1/2" line after the initial 1/4" fitting, it would make no difference. Am I wrong?

On my RobbMc Regulator, in bypass mode, the fittings for fuel coming and going to the carburetor are 3/8" NPT. Why run a 1/2" line to it if the 3/8" will restrict flow?

Is the factor you are concerned about the length of the restriction? Where in the Robbmc, or my sender, the very short 3/8" or 1/4" passage has no real effect?
I will try to give my opinion on some of your questions:

1) the 1/4" NPT to 3/8" barb fitting connected to your 1/2" fuel line would be the 'RESTRICTION' to the system if the system was designed like a factory system with a forward mounted fuel pump "sucking" (creating a negative pressure) on the fuel system.

2) In would case you have a Tanks, inc fuel system with a fuel pump inside the tank that can PRESSURIZE the fuel passing thru the 1/4" NPT to 3/8" barb fitting to 42+ psi of fuel pressure thru the 1/4" NPT to 3/8" barb fitting before it gets to the 1/2" fuel line.

3) The 1/2" fuel line, being filled full of fuel now sees 42 psi on one end of the line and tries to pass fuel being pushed at 42 psi thru the length of the line (minus wall friction from the hose of metal lines). The volume coming out of the pump would remain the same as the 'RESTRICTION' to the system is still the initial 1/4" NPT to 3/8" barb fitting as well as the outlet diameter nipple of the pump itself. The 1/4" NPT to 3/8" barb fitting would be the actual 'RESTRICTION' to the system' if you were running a dual fuel pump deal where the pump capability was higher than the 1/4" NPT to 3/8" barb fitting could flow.

4) So the 1/2" line does little for you move the fuel at a given rate thru the larger conduit.
It you are pushing 1 quart of fuel thru the line at one end (or marbles) if 50 marbles pass thru one end of the hose in a minute, then 50 marbles come out the other end of the hose in a minute. BUT if a dual pump could push 100 marbles thru the hose and the hose becomes the restriction then the hose needs to be larger. A 1/2" hose can pass a lot of 'marbles' when two pumps are pushing at 40+ psi of fuel pressure.

5) Then the engine consumes a given amount of fuel.

6) If the consumption rate is low then a lot of fuel has to pass back to the tank or the pressure is too high to the carb or fuel injectors. As the pressure will be lower in the system, you need a given diameter line that will return enough fuel so that you can maintain the fuel pressure at the carb or fuel rail system. 6 psi at the carb or 39-42 psi at the fuel rail. If it takes a even larger fuel return line to pass the fuel back to the tank then that is what you need.

7) Last point, If the fuel return line is 1/2" and the fitting going back to the tank is a 1/4" NPT to 3/8" barb fitting, but the return system pressure is lower then how can the return filling not be a restriction in the line? So you may be able to use small fitting and a high pressure pump to push fuel but a large fitting to get the fuel back in the tank or your big return line does nothing at low speeds. At high speeds the engine is using the fuel so there is very little return fuel going back to the tank thru the fitting.

So you need to optimize the return line/fittings for IDLE conditions and the feed lines and fittings/fuel pumps for WOT conditions.

Tom V.

ps if you are pumping fuel from the tank to a Robmac surge tank deal then you basically are using the stock tank system to keep the surge tank system filled with fuel (that is not already recirculated by the surge tank system).

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #65  
Old 12-30-2016, 12:13 AM
vidguy's Avatar
vidguy vidguy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 3,822
Default

Thanks for the clear explanation. Especially regarding the suction or pushing effect Tom. Much Appreciated.

__________________
--
James

Work
'67 GTO Convertible "Koerner Built 413 500 hp with a Victor!.. I'll run a stock intake."
'75 Formula 400 - Daily Driver -
Running with my Home Built 455 and TH400

Details here:
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=588372
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017