[geeteeohguy]

Originally Posted by Gach

It’s a build for friend, I talked him out of going with LS motor he wanted to make 500 hp. Here’s some information

His heads 114 cc chamber heads.. compression was 8.2 if I calculated it correctly. With E-Heads it’s now closer to 11.1. #96 heads. Didn’t know they made them with 114 cc chamber, I checked them with Borat (sp)

So your talking close to .3 more compression I’m guessing those iron heads flow 190 cfm and E-heads are say 260-270. So 60-70 more cfm. So it actually made 73 more hp he posted number wrong.

That was with his Lunati 1051072 cam. Don’t laugh And 3 tube headers
The latest change went with Comp cam BP6014SP and 4 tube headers 1-7-8”
Cam pick up 16 hp, and 1# torque. Headers pick up whopping 25 hp for total of 491 hp. The intake is a Edelbrock dual plane with the divider cut down, and it’s a Holley 850. With 1” spacer that fits under the hood.

After messing with timing and jetting it it end up making 502 hp at 4900 rpms

I’m blown away, says you can easily make 500 hp with nice stock block and bolt on out box heads. He’s super happy. My cam choice would’ve been Crower 60919 cam

What size engine?

[Gach]

Oops…Believe it works out to 461-462 ci, it’s a .030 over 455.

[Stan Weiss]

The more that got posted the more this looked good. Up to a point. This made 450 Peak HP @ 4900 RPM, Nick made 395.7 Peak HP @ 4900 RPM. A difference of 54.3 HP I can see that happening. Now comes the part which I just don't see. Nick made 509.8 peak lbft @ 3400 RPM. This made 515 peak lbft at an unknown RPM a difference of 5.2 lbft. Could this be the reason the dyno sheet slowbird ask for has not been posted?

Stan

[Gach]

Stan you crack me up, Your puzzles over 5.2 torque incase, you copy this from PZ and drag it over here, for a obvious reason now it’s showing why.

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by Stan Weiss

Gach,
So it made peak HP of 450 @ 4900? At what RPM was the 515 peak torque?

Stan

Originally Posted by Gach

Stan you crack me up, Your puzzles over 5.2 torque incase, you copy this from PZ and drag it over here, for a obvious reason now it’s showing why.

Gach,
Why didn't you answer my question? It could have made a difference in what I have posted.

The 54.3 HP difference @ 4900 RPM is a difference of 58.2 lbft increase torque. Yet peak torque just about increased.

Stan

[Gach]

You and Slowbird are tripping all over yourselfs to create as much doubt as possible. Oh my god 5.2 more lbs torque. It can’t be True.. you both make it pretty obvious. What you gonna do is get a good thread locked. Let the readers decide for themselves it’s a no Brainer. I was just wondering how long it was gonna take you two.

[Gach]

I don’t answer your questions for obvious reasons.

[slowbird]

Originally Posted by Gach

You and Slowbird are tripping all over yourselfs to create as much doubt as possible. Oh my god 5.2 more lbs torque. It can’t be True.. you both make it pretty obvious. What you gonna do is get a good thread locked. Let the readers decide for themselves it’s a no Brainer. I was just wondering how long it was gonna take you two.

My 1 post in this whole thread asking for a pic really got to you? Lol

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by Gach

I don’t answer your questions for obvious reasons.

Gach,
What is that? There is no dyno sheet? Just post a real dyno sheet!!!!!!!

Stan

[Gach]

I’m glad you think so, truth is I’ve been into your head for long Time. That’s been obvious, how’s that BBF motor doing you know the one that dyno at 120 degrees water that supposedly made close to 900 hp. That’s pretty good only one I know that goes down track at 120 degrees amazing.

[Gach]

For you Stan you.

…….……………./¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’…../
……….”…\………. _.·
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\…

[Gach]

Slowturd sitting there thinking of a come back.

…….……………./¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’…../
……….”…\………. _.·´
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\…

[slowbird]

Hard to believe me asking for a pic causes such a reaction from you.

[Gach]

Oh you mean Stan make reference to you asking, you two on phone with each other, if that’s all you guys have it’s not working. I know that hurts.

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by Gach

Oh you mean Stan make reference to you asking, you two on phone with each other, if that’s all you guys have it’s not working. I know that hurts.

What hurts is you not have a dyno sheet and do not know all of that math stuff works. I will not post it because next thing I know you post it somewhere else as yours.

518.3 lbft @ xxxxx RPM
449.86 HP @ 4900

If you answer questions with real answer who knows where this thread could have gone.

Not this time but I do have a few dozen Super Flow Dyno Files from Brian / slowbirb

Stan

[Gach]

Stan. Who cares.

[slowbird]

Jay S called you out for this thing looking like the engine Nick did on YouTube, and yet you go after me for just asking about a pic. Talk about being in someone's heads, lol!

[Gach]

Any fool would know if you incase compression by .2-.3 point and head flow 60-70 cfm and make cam change it’s going to make more hp. You’ve been nit picking away at the combo playing with your little formulas. You copy this from PZ it’s obvious why. I don’t have the dyno sheets, he’s perfectly happy with the results, so get over it

[Gach]

Originally Posted by slowbird

Jay S called you out for this thing looking like the engine Nick did on YouTube, and yet you go after me for just asking about a pic. Talk about being in someone's heads, lol!

No in your head he call me out, basically saying it’s a similar to Nicks. Who cares !

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by Gach

For you Stan you.

…….……………./¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’…../
……….”…\………. _.·
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\…

Did you forget where you are at?

Stan