#1  
Old 06-26-2021, 12:38 PM
punkin punkin is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 295
Default New Rear & Suspension

Hello all,

I'm in a state of analysis paralysis. I'm putting a new motor and trans into my 68 firebird and the old 10 bolt won't live long with the new combo and the leaf springs are tired and need to go.

Motor is putting out 700+ lb/ft torque and 4L80e behind it. Car weighs in right at 3600 lbs with sub-frame connectors. The chassis is otherwise stock and I would like to avoid cutting things up.

I've heard the pros for keeping or updating the leaf spring suspension but I'm bent on putting in a modern set up. I'll be putting in a 9" rear but I'm torn between a torque arm setup or a triangulated 4-link. (Ridetech 4-link vs Chassis Works G-Link Torque Arm).

The car will be mostly street driven but will go to the dragstip from time to time and I do intend to put slicks on it. Knowing the dual purpose plan, which suspension type would you recommend?

I thank you for considering my questions.

__________________
1968 Firebird
IAIIa 522
340 E-heads
Northwind with XFlow TBI
4L80E
3.50:1 Rear
  #2  
Old 06-26-2021, 12:47 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

Of those two systems, I choose the G link for two reasons.

1. The motion ratio is much better
2. The ridetech system uses a single shear mount for the coilover. Single shear is fine for shock loads. I don’t trust it to hold the weight of the vehicle.

All that said, a quality set of leafs would be my pick for your use case. No need to reengineer the wheel on this one. I would have a custom set of leafs built for your need. They’ll be expensive at around 800-1000 for the set but you’re still ahead on cost for the bolt in coil over systems.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
  #3  
Old 06-26-2021, 12:59 PM
punkin punkin is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 295
Default

I thank you. I too have been leaning more towards a torque arm.

Since you did mention the leaf springs, which manufacturer would you be inclinde to go with. One of the reason I'm steering away from the leafs is the lack of adjustability and don't want to hassle with the what if the springs are to tall or low, too stiff, too soft. I like the idea of having some adjustability with a coil over solution.

__________________
1968 Firebird
IAIIa 522
340 E-heads
Northwind with XFlow TBI
4L80E
3.50:1 Rear
  #4  
Old 06-26-2021, 01:34 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

I would talk to global west about your needs. You may also consider talking to Guldstrand Motorsports. I’m not certain if they do leafs anymore but they used to do race spec custom stuff. You can also lean on the local circle track guys in your area if they are around. The street stocks will be using leafs for the most part and there’s probably a decent place locally to you.

Having adjustability is nice and people market coil overs for that but honestly 99% of people once they get the car set where they want will never touch it again. For a leaf setup you can use a stock or just slightly de-arched spring then tube ride height with blocks. It’s a little bit more work initially, but the likelihood of you changing that at any regular rate is pretty low. I’d you’re doing street and a bit of drag, just having an adjustable shock would get you most of the way there.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
The Following User Says Thank You to JLMounce For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 07-01-2021, 01:23 AM
blueghoast's Avatar
blueghoast blueghoast is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by punkin View Post
I thank you. I too have been leaning more towards a torque arm.

Since you did mention the leaf springs, which manufacturer would you be inclinde to go with. One of the reason I'm steering away from the leafs is the lack of adjustability and don't want to hassle with the what if the springs are to tall or low, too stiff, too soft. I like the idea of having some adjustability with a coil over solution.
Go with cal-tracks or slapper-bars, They will work fine and it's cheap.

GT

  #6  
Old 07-01-2021, 07:29 AM
AG's Avatar
AG AG is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueghoast View Post
Go with cal-tracks or slapper-bars, They will work fine and it's cheap.

GT
X2, they work great and don't require any modification or welding.

__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
  #7  
Old 07-01-2021, 10:22 AM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,178
Default

If you are just worried about the rear surviving and launch I would echo what others are saying about sticking with leafs.

If you want a more modern ride however, you are probably on the right track. I have all new components in the back of mine with an 8.5 corporate unit. The rear of the car still rides like a log truck over bumps compared to a new car. The front isnt bad, but the rear sucks over potholes.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
  #8  
Old 07-02-2021, 01:26 AM
yahooskidoo's Avatar
yahooskidoo yahooskidoo is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 340
Default

I have a stout 455 with a 4l80e and I put Global West cat5 leaf springs in it along with their subframe connectors.

  #9  
Old 08-06-2021, 01:34 AM
65madgoat's Avatar
65madgoat 65madgoat is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 385
Default

Speedtech's suspension is really nice that could work in many scenarios.



https://speedtechperformance.com/pro...7-1969-camaro/

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017