Non Pontiac Motors in Pontiacs includes factory 403,305,350 Chevy, Buick V6,
Also Pontiac Motors in non-Pontiacs!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2010, 07:57 AM
RR67GTO's Avatar
RR67GTO RR67GTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Clackamas, OR. USA
Posts: 1,884
Default WRX engine in a Firebird?

So, I was thinking of pulling the 68 350 and installing a low mile WRX engine in it's place. I have heard, that mounts can be made for the swap. Anyone know who is making them? Thanks.

Mike

__________________
Build it fast, build it right, hold On TIGHT !!!
  #2  
Old 01-26-2010, 08:46 AM
FLYNLOW's Avatar
FLYNLOW FLYNLOW is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Livermore, CA, USA
Posts: 319
Default

What the? Why??? Not like the little 4 banger is all that great. I highly doubt anyone makes mounts, and those will be the very very least of your issues.

__________________
'73 Formula 400
Cammed LS1/T56/3.73's
12.92@106.04 2.03 60 ft. <~~ Bone stock LS1 with 4L60E/3.08's
Went 12's in pure daily driver trim! A/C, leather power seats, power
steering, full stereo, sound deadening, power windows, full suspension,
true street tires, power 4 wheel discs, and 25MPG!
  #3  
Old 01-26-2010, 05:49 PM
Stuart's Avatar
Stuart Stuart is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,938
Default

A Subaru WRX? They are wide and flat, with the widest dimension at the same level as the crankshaft, so I doubt you could make one fit in a Firebird.

  #4  
Old 01-26-2010, 08:23 PM
goatless's Avatar
goatless goatless is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newtown,CT
Posts: 4,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
A Subaru WRX? They are wide and flat, with the widest dimension at the same level as the crankshaft, so I doubt you could make one fit in a Firebird.
Like Stuart said, even if you can get the past the obvious "why?" question, the WRX motor is a flat 4 "boxer" motor. It is low and wide, even if it would fit between the frame rails, you'd need to remove the cross member to get it low enough.

__________________
1966 GTO
1969 Lemans Convertible- F.A.S.T. legal family cruiser. 12.59 on G70-14 Polyglas tires. 1.78 60'
1969 Bonneville Safari- cross country family cruiser. .
1979 Trans Am 400, 4-speed, 4 wheel disc.

View from the drivers seat racing down Atco Raceway- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhYDMdOEC7A

Ride along in the other lane-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIzgpLtF_uw
  #5  
Old 01-27-2010, 05:37 PM
BVR421's Avatar
BVR421 BVR421 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rusty Iron Ranch
Posts: 6,218
Default

go for it, do it
what could possibly go wrong?

  #6  
Old 01-27-2010, 07:07 PM
Silver Judge's Avatar
Silver Judge Silver Judge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,417
Default

Ya know, the subaru boxer engine fits..............
under the hood of my subaru

I like subarus very much, I do a lot of winter driving in the mountains and they're great cars. I 've never driven a WRX but I know that they go like stink.

Even cooler than putting a WRX motor in a Firebird would be to put a stout pontiac motor in a WRX or some other kind of Subaru

__________________
Knock Knock Knockin' on 11's Door
'70 Judge, Palladium Silver w/Red Interior
Powered by SD Performance, Ported 6X Heads
501 HP, 554 ft lbs TQ
12.14 ET @ 114 MPH , Supercase Muncie M22, 3:55
Suspension: HO Racing, BMR< Sykorat, and Bilsteins
Narrowed 12 bolt , 16x8 VintageWheel Works,
Comp T/As on street, MT Drag Radials @ Strip

http://www.sdperformance.com/custome...1.php?carID=42
  #7  
Old 01-27-2010, 10:15 PM
poison heart's Avatar
poison heart poison heart is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 2,287
Send a message via AIM to poison heart
Default

WHY!? A turbo boxer engine might be "quick" in a little ass WRX but I'd be willing to bet that a mild 400 Firebird would blow the doors off a WRX. WRXs only ran like 13.8s with all wheel drive. In a much heavier firebird and only using rear wheel drive it wouldn't be very fast at all. Save some time and money and do a 400 swap.

__________________
Robert Lewis

1959 Star Chief 4 Dr HT dual quad 389 4 speed
1962 Pontiac Plain Jane Catalina

http://pontiac-59.com/
  #8  
Old 02-27-2010, 10:28 AM
gto65lvr's Avatar
gto65lvr gto65lvr is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 279
Default

I thought I was going to be the first one to do this. I got a custom fat man subframe made to make it work and modified the trans tunner and floor with the turbo setup it is tuned and the engine dyno/d at 513HP!!!

Good lluck with your project you will have lots to do

~~~ hahahahha

__________________
Eric

CURRENT CARS
68 Firbird 400ci convertible
  #9  
Old 03-01-2010, 07:54 AM
RR67GTO's Avatar
RR67GTO RR67GTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Clackamas, OR. USA
Posts: 1,884
Default

Well, it's almost in, and I didn't have to buy the Fat Man anything at all. And, it's because of your build I've fallowed with the same engine. I, decided to go for it anyway. Let me know what your time slip says on the first outing. Thanks friend... Mike. Oh, I do need to get a good tune for it yet. Maybe this next month...

__________________
Build it fast, build it right, hold On TIGHT !!!
  #10  
Old 04-01-2010, 12:52 AM
turbo69bird's Avatar
turbo69bird turbo69bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,437
Default

Ill race your turbo WRX firebird with my turbo 455 pontiac anytime you want!LOL

Well see who makes the better engine turbo to turbo.


I have nothing against your build its cool to be different, but you cant beat cubes and turbo with no cubes and turbo! especially in a 67 thru 69 firebird. Christ, I even sell headers for pontiac with a turbo in that body style. It was a no brainer.

__________________
Happiness is just a turbocharger away!
960 HP @ 11 psi, 9.70 at 146.
Iron heads, iron stock 2 bolt block , stock crank, 9 years haven't even changed a spark plug!
selling turbos and turbo related parts since 2005!
  #11  
Old 04-01-2010, 09:00 AM
gearbanger's Avatar
gearbanger gearbanger is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,403
Default

Yeah 513 hp at 40,000 rpm and 200 ft/lbs!

  #12  
Old 04-01-2010, 01:52 PM
gto65lvr's Avatar
gto65lvr gto65lvr is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 279
Default

Yeah what he said 513 HP and 200 torque.
Well I was kidding about putting the suby in my too.

But ya messing up an old pontiac with one of those over ratted All aluminum LS engines that way lighter than a cast iron pontiac motor, more efficient and better gas mileage with a great EFI system and programmable factory computer causing closer to 50/50 weight distribution in my old 65 Lemans convert I am just about done with setting in place. I agree why do something silly like that?? I will have over 440HP with just a cam. headers and tune. For under 3200 bucks on a motor with 36k miles on it.

Yup what a waste

PS I still like the conventional pontiac power hell I have even built an IA2 for one of my cars. If I was to do it all over again I would buy a mast engine built LS3 for less and have more. Or a GM crate cadillac supercharged engine with a factory rated 550+HP with minor adjustments would be 600hp or more and idle stock and drive smooth unlike a radical conventional pontiac built to get that kind of power.

Just dollars and sense
And what ya want

No one is right and no one is wrong...
Peace

__________________
Eric

CURRENT CARS
68 Firbird 400ci convertible
  #13  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:58 PM
turbo69bird's Avatar
turbo69bird turbo69bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gto65lvr View Post
Yeah what he said 513 HP and 200 torque.
Well I was kidding about putting the suby in my too.

But ya messing up an old pontiac with one of those over ratted All aluminum LS engines that way lighter than a cast iron pontiac motor, more efficient and better gas mileage with a great EFI system and programmable factory computer causing closer to 50/50 weight distribution in my old 65 Lemans convert I am just about done with setting in place. I agree why do something silly like that?? I will have over 440HP with just a cam. headers and tune. For under 3200 bucks on a motor with 36k miles on it.

Yup what a waste

PS I still like the conventional pontiac power hell I have even built an IA2 for one of my cars. If I was to do it all over again I would buy a mast engine built LS3 for less and have more. Or a GM crate cadillac supercharged engine with a factory rated 550+HP with minor adjustments would be 600hp or more and idle stock and drive smooth unlike a radical conventional pontiac built to get that kind of power.

Just dollars and sense
And what ya want

No one is right and no one is wrong...
Peace
The LS is a great power plant but its still a bastard if you put a chevy in it. "To each his own, I dont throw stone's" is what I always say but I personally like to stick with pontiac power in a pontiac. unless it could have been ordered with chevy power. then its fair game.

You cant make LS power any cheaper than pontiac power if you use your brains.

My engine is a 2 bolt 455 with iron heads and hardly any tricks in the motor. Just good rods and good machine work, Then I bolted on a turbo and make close to 900 HP

sure theres faster LS cars but theres faster pontiac powered cars too.

I think its fine if you LS your car because its your car and you should be happy with it.

same for a WRX firebird. If thats what floats your boat you should do it.

__________________
Happiness is just a turbocharger away!
960 HP @ 11 psi, 9.70 at 146.
Iron heads, iron stock 2 bolt block , stock crank, 9 years haven't even changed a spark plug!
selling turbos and turbo related parts since 2005!
  #14  
Old 04-01-2010, 11:59 PM
turbo69bird's Avatar
turbo69bird turbo69bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gearbanger View Post
Yeah 513 hp at 40,000 rpm and 200 ft/lbs!
ITS FUNNY CAUSE ITS TRUE!LOLOLOLOL

__________________
Happiness is just a turbocharger away!
960 HP @ 11 psi, 9.70 at 146.
Iron heads, iron stock 2 bolt block , stock crank, 9 years haven't even changed a spark plug!
selling turbos and turbo related parts since 2005!
  #15  
Old 04-02-2010, 11:24 AM
mudbird's Avatar
mudbird mudbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 213
Default

The one question I have is, how aggressive is the driver going to be with the car when done?


I ask because, around here, there is some fast wrx's but I have never been beat by one yet. They are just crazy, going on the shoulder at 100 plus in traffic ect...
Not just one guy either every kid around here with one seems to think they have the fastest car in town!
There are some very fast cars here in MN and torque is what you want in a street car.

What rear gear?

Anybody else notice this in their towns scene? The wrx guys are really aggressive here and for what-to get beat by an old car?

__________________
MudBird
  #16  
Old 04-02-2010, 08:01 PM
pontorquer's Avatar
pontorquer pontorquer is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Elie Manitoba Canada
Posts: 781
Default

Why not put a Pontiac 455 in the WRX ? LOL !

  #17  
Old 04-02-2010, 08:11 PM
poison heart's Avatar
poison heart poison heart is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 2,287
Send a message via AIM to poison heart
Default

Because a 455 would break that WRX in half

__________________
Robert Lewis

1959 Star Chief 4 Dr HT dual quad 389 4 speed
1962 Pontiac Plain Jane Catalina

http://pontiac-59.com/
  #18  
Old 04-12-2010, 10:34 PM
turbo69bird's Avatar
turbo69bird turbo69bird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,437
Default

We have had alot of WRX guys getting themselves in trouble. However I cant talk I rolled my 69 firebird convertible when I was in highschool. I guess what changes also stays the same,LOL

__________________
Happiness is just a turbocharger away!
960 HP @ 11 psi, 9.70 at 146.
Iron heads, iron stock 2 bolt block , stock crank, 9 years haven't even changed a spark plug!
selling turbos and turbo related parts since 2005!
  #19  
Old 04-13-2010, 12:33 PM
disc0monkey's Avatar
disc0monkey disc0monkey is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 782
Default

dont people usually want to replace wrx engines with LS1s? not like the firebird could handle well enough to really benefit from the lower center of gravity of that motor.

the only real reason those motors are good because they are pair up with a cardboard light ass car with a close ratio trans. those motors DONT get out of their own way until about 4200 rpm, the lag is terrible, put than motor in anything heavier like a firebird and any tuned junk yard 455 will have no problem walking you.

+1 stoker crank and a 6spd will get you at least mid 20s in mpgs


Last edited by disc0monkey; 04-13-2010 at 12:44 PM.
  #20  
Old 02-22-2011, 03:14 PM
gto65lvr's Avatar
gto65lvr gto65lvr is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 279
Default

have not seen an update Did you ever get the swap done on your firebird?? ~~~~~~~~

__________________
Eric

CURRENT CARS
68 Firbird 400ci convertible
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017